News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Central Excise - Classification - Holograms supplied to State Excise and Prohibition Department, Govt of Tamil Nadu - Classifiable under CETH 4901 - Not under 3919 - Demand set aside: CESTAT

 

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, OCT 19, 2015: THE appellants are manufacturers of holograms and clearing the same to the State Excise and Prohibition Department, Govt of Tamil Nadu classifying the product under 4901 of the Central Excise Tariff and clearing the same without payment of duty. The department issued SCN classifying the goods under chapter 3919 of CET and chargeable to appropriate rate of duty and demanded duty of Rs.22,01,01,514/- under proviso to Section 11A(1) and also proposed for penalty under Section 11AC. Adjudicating authority in his impugned order by relying Tribunals order in the appellants own case i.e. Holostick India Ltd. Vs CCE Meerut-II - 2004 (167) ELT 301 (Tri.-Del.) classified the goods under 3919 of CET along with interest and confirmed the demand and also imposed equal penalty.

The appellant contended inter alia that against the Tribunals order of Noida unit relied on by the Adjudicating Authority, they preferred appeal before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court in their order 2015-TIOL-60-SC-CX set aside the Tribunal's order. The Supreme Court has settled the issue finally and also set aside the Boards circular dt. 21.6.96. The Supreme Court categorically held that the primary use of the product (hologram) is security and not the quality of being adhesive and classified under 4901.

After hearing both sides, the Tribunal held:

++  The Hon'ble Apex Court clearly held that as per HSN Note (2) of Chapter 49 the security holograms the product in question where the primary use is of security and self-adhesive is only incidental and therefore rightly falls under chapter 49 as a product of 'printing industry'. By respectfully following both the Hon'ble Apex Court decisions, (later decision is of appellant's own case) it is held that appellant's "Polyester Hologram Excise Label" produced out of stamping foil (transfer foil) is rightly classifiable under chapter 49 of CETA and find that hologram produced by the appellants are not covered under any of the excluded items i.e. Ch.39.18, 48.14 or 48.21 of HSN of Chapter 49.

++  Excise duty demand confirmed on the Hologram classified under 39199090 is liable to be set aside. Consequently penalties imposed on the main appellant as well as on the other appellants are also liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and all the appeals are allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2015-TIOL-2236-CESTAT-MAD)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.