News Update

Delhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashViksit Bharat @2047: Taxes form the BedrockGST - April month collections go past Rs 2 lakh crore threshold - peak to Rs 2.1 lakh croreCX - Alleged clandestine removal - Not replying to SCN on the ground that letter is not furnished by department is only a ruse as reliance is not placed on the same by the respondent authority for adjudicating the SCNs: SCGST - Proper officer observes that the reply filed is not satisfactory and since the assessee has nothing more to say, demand is confirmed - Officer has not applied his mind - Matter remitted: HCGST - Petitioner had no opportunity to even object to the retrospective cancellation of registration - Petitioner does not seek to continue his business and has sought cancellation of registration - Order modified accordingly: HCGST - Seizing the outward movement of funds from petitioner's bank account - Life of an order of provisional attachment u/s 83(2) is only one year - HDFC Bank, henceforth, cannot restrain operation of bank account: HCTax - on Death and ContemplationDelhi, Noida schools receive bomb threats; Children sent back homeI-T- Writ court is not required to interfere with assessment order, where assessee also has available option of statutory appeal: HCED seizes Rs 90 Cr stored in crypto in Gaming App scamI-T-Transfer of assessment is sustained, where assessee does not reply to any notice issued in this regard & where valid reasons exist for transferring assessment: HCHM appeals Naxalism will be erased in 2 yrs if Modi voted back to powerAmerica softens offence related to use of marijuanaI-T - Rule 11UA does not mentions pre-condition of approval of balance sheet by Annual General Meeting: ITATAfter US & UK India comes third in terms of 79 mn cyber attacks in 2023: StudyCBIC revises tariff value of gold, silver & edible oils
 
CX - s.4 - Valuation - Every amount collected by manufacturer from buyer is not includible - Revenue has not been able to establish that amounts collected in respect of 'diaries and calendars' were in connection with sale of excisable goods: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 13, 2015: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The respondents are manufacturers of steel products and selling the same through various dealers. They were also getting “diaries and calendars” printed for the purpose of advertisement. The dealers were purchasing these diaries and calendars from the appellant and some amounts were being collected by the appellants from the dealers who purchased the goods.

Revenue is of the view that the amounts collected from the dealers is includable in Transaction value as the same are advertising costs.

The Commissioner(A) set aside the duty demand and, therefore, Revenue is before the CESTAT.

The AR submitted that the decision in Amco Batteries has been wrongly relied upon by the lower appellate authority inasmuch as in that case there was a dispute between dealers and manufacturers about advertisement expenses and there was a written contract between parties. However, in the instant case there was no such dispute and there was no such agreement between parties. Reliance is placed on the circular MF (DR) F. No. 354/81/2000-TRU dated 30.6.2000 which clarified that all amounts charged in relation to sale of goods will form part of assessable value.

The respondent assessee averred that the value of diaries and calendars can be added only if the purchase of such material is mandatory and not if it is voluntary; that only very few dealers bought the diaries and calendars.

The Bench adverted to the case law relied by the Commissioner(A) and inter alia observed -

"6. It is clear that what has been held is that unless purchase and distribution of such material by dealers is mandatory, the value of the same can not be added. Further more the transaction value will only contain the amounts collected in connection with sale of excisable goods. Every amount collected by the manufacturer from the buyer is not includible. Revenue has not been able to establish from fact that the amounts collected were in connection with sale of excisable goods. The respondents have clearly stated that the diaries and calendars are made and supplied at the request of dealers and it is not mandatory since only few dealers are buying these things. In view of above the revenue appeal is dismissed…."

(See 2015-TIOL-2183-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.