News Update

Air India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and Japan10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashGST - s.107(11) - There is no fetter on the powers of the appellate authority to modify the order passed u/s 130(2) by the adjudicating authority: HCSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad caseCBDT amends jurisdiction of Pr CCITs in many citiesGST - Statutory mandate of sub-section (4) of Section 75 is that a personal hearing should be provided either, if requested for, or if an order adverse to the taxpayer is proposed to be issued: HCCCI invites proposal for launching Market Study on AI and CompetitionGST - Documents with regard to service of notice could not be located; that impugned orders came be to be passed without an opportunity being granted to Petitioner to submit documents and being heard - Matter remanded: HCIndia initiates anti-dumping duty probe against import of Telescopic Channel drawer slider from ChinaAFMS, Delhi IIT ink MoU for collaborative research & trainingCX - The activity of waste water treatment is part of manufacturing activity and any activity which is directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture would be eligible for credit: CESTATDoP&T notifies fixation of Himachal IPS cadre strength and amendment in pay rulesIndia, Cambodia ink MoU for HRD in Civil ServiceBengaluru Airport Customs seizes 10 yellow anacondas from check-in baggageST - Appellant has collected some service tax from service recipient, which has been deposited with Department, same shall not be refunded to appellant: CESTATDelhi daily air traffic goes beyond 4.7 lakh paxGovt organizing National Colloquium on Grassroots Governance2 Telangana students killed in road accident in USI-T- Addl. Commr. or above ranking officer to probe how I-T portal reflected demand being raised against assessee, despite Revenue not having issued any notice or passed any order against assessee: HCAnother tremor of 6.3 magnitude visits Taiwan; shakes tall buildingsI-T- Donations given out of accumulated funds u/s 11(2) are not allowable as application of income for charitable or religious purposes and the same shall be deemed to be income of assessee : ITATYou are arrogant Mr Musk, says Australian PM over Sydney stabbing video banUnited Health reports theft of huge Americans’ dataI-T - Travelling conveyance expenses should be disallowed to extent of bills which were not verifiable and have no nexus with business of assessee: ITATEarth Day: Biden announces USD 7 bn grant for rooftop solar panelsOECD to release annual report on Tax Inspectors without Borders on April 29EU introduces easy Schengen Visa rules for IndiansI-T- Leasehold rights in land are not within purview of section 50C of Act : ITAT
 
CX - Multilayered plastic collapsible tubes being fragile need to be protected during transport - Assessee clearing goods in special boxes over and above primary packing as per agreement with buyer - cost of secondary packing given specially at request of the customer not includible in AV: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 12, 2015: DURING the period 1.4.99 to 30.6.2000, the assessee cleared multilayered plastic collapsible tubes to M/s Sunshine Cosmetics Limited, Hyderabad , in special boxes over and above the primary packing per the agreement with the said party.

After receiving the material, M/s Sunshine Cosmetics would sell the special packing in the market and remit the sale proceeds to the appellant. The appellant had received Rs. 5,96,475/- as such sale proceeds. The appellant have paid excise duty amounting to Rs. 1,13,070/- on the said amount received from the buyer.

A demand notice was issued to the appellant seeking to include, in terms of clause (d) of subsection (4) of Section 4 of CEA, 1944, the value of the boxes in the assessable value. The total value of the boxes was ascertained as Rs.13,51,542/- and a duty of Rs. 3,06,886/- was demanded on the same.

The duty was confirmed by adjudicating as well as the appellate authority.

Before the CESTAT, the appellant argued that the special packing, in the nature of secondary packing, was for the purpose of transport of multilayered plastics collapsible tubes, which are fragile in nature, and hence had to be protected during the transport. It is further submitted that the cost of secondary packing was not includable in the assessable value in view of the apex court decision in National Leather Cloth Manufacturing Co. Ltd. - 2010-TIOL-53-SC-CX.

The AR reiterated the findings of the lower authorities.

The Bench observed that the issue of secondary packing has been dealt by the Apex Court in the case of Bombay Tyre International Ltd. - 2002-TIOL-374-SC-CX.

After extracting paragraphs 51 and 52 of the said decision, the CESTAT concluded -

"5. Since cost of secondary packing not ordinarily used and given specially at the request of customer, is not includible in the assessable value, the benefit of exclusion of the cost of special packing as a secondary packing has to be allowed to the appellant in terms of Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The appeal filed by the appellants is consequential allowed."

(See 2015-TIOL-2173-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.