News Update

Jio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficIndia takes part in 'Institutionalization of SMART Government for Improving Service Delivery' in LondonGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his health'Sunflowers were the first ones to know' - film by FTII student selected at CannesSARFAESI Act - Award of interest on auction money at rate applicable to fixed deposits is not a correct view and rate of interest deserves to be enhanced: SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')ST - Chit Funds - Tax was not paid under mistake of law but upon demand by tax authorities - Refund not having been filed within time was rightly rejected: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Without considering reply on merits, proper officer has held that reply is unsatisfactory and, therefore, he is left with no alternative but to create demand - Order set aside: HCGST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details, accordingly the same cannot be sustained: HCGST - Registration could not have been cancelled retrospectively for the period for which returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HCGST - Notfn 11/2017-CTR amended by 03/2022 - Work contracts executed before 18 July 2022 - Petitioners should file refund claims before respondent agitating grievance and same be examined and orders passed within 4 months: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesGST - Entire tax liability has been realised by appropriating the amount from the petitioner's bank account, therefore, Revenue interest stands fully secured - Since tax proposal was confirmed without participation of petitioner, order set aside and matter remanded: HCCaste Census is my mission, says RahulRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case
 
Information Technology Agreement-II - Does India need it?

SEPTEMBER 05, 2015

By Manoj Gupta

IN less than a period of two years, the WTO is all set to witness finalization of another major agreement within the Member countries. After the Trade Facilitation Agreement which was inked in December 2013 and adopted on 21-11-2014, the expansion of Information Technology Agreement (ITA) is in sight. The ITA-II, as it is popularly known,would include about 200 more products on which the participant countries would gradually eliminate import duties. 54 Member countries which are presently participating in the new Agreement have on 24-7-2015 confirmed the tentative accord reached between them earlier. The Agreement is expected to be signed most probably in the December 2015 Ministerial meeting of the WTO Members in Nairobi.

India, though part of the original ITA which was concluded way back in 1997 and has eliminated import duties on number of products since then,has been hesitant to become Member of the expansion club. It has always voiced its concerns against such expansion, right from 1998 when the idea of expansion was originally mooted. Let us analyze some pros and cons in this regard.

Here, it may be noted that the latest expansion would also include next generation semi-conductors, medical devices covering equipments like MRI machines and CT scanners, GPS technology devices, printed matter/cards to download software and games, printer ink cartridges, software media such as solid state drives, video game consoles and certain consumer electronic goods.

Impact on "Make in India"

A cursory look at the proposed expansion list tells us that India is a major consumer of these goods.So, reduction in import duties of such items would reduce the cost of these items to a great extent (of course, this will happen if India decides to be part of ITA-II). Import of parts and components will become cheaper. This would lower our production cost and may boost our exports also by making our products more competitive in the international markets. Here, it may be noted that major exporters, the world over, are also major importers, taking benefit of value chains spread across the world, and any reduction in the cost of components will definitely have its effect on the final cost of the product.

So, will there be a paradigm shift in the manufacturing sector in India if it joins the new group? The answer is NO. Majority of these items are final products consumable as such and hence if tariffs are cut, India will see surge in imports which may dent the nascent domestic industry in this sector. For 'Make in India' to succeed, India needs critical parts and technology. Import of fully deliverable consumer goods should not be the priority here. Since the idea is to promote production in India, there is a strong case for encouragement of domestic procurement also, which will also reduce our trade deficit.

Reduction or elimination of import duties is not the only measure to encourage MNCs to come to India and set up their manufacturing units in India, There are other ways to ease the working atmosphere here and promote exports from India.For example,efforts should be made to eliminate various non-tariff barriers, unending declarations, forms and guarantees.

Further, India already allows duty free import of input sand capital goods under various Export Promotion Schemes as promulgated under the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20. Exporters can take advantage from the ever reliable Advance authorization scheme, EPCG scheme or even the recently announced MEIS, in addition to other benefits.

Besides, even if there is a requirement of reduction or elimination of import duties, India can always do that by way of a simple Customs notification. It need not bind itself before the WTO and subject its tariff to scrutiny by other Member countries?

No case for tariff reduction anyway

Loss of revenue, as far as import duties are concerned, is another major factor which weighs against any tariff reduction, particularly on consumer items. So, unless substantial amount of foreign exchange is expected from export of goods manufactured out of these products, there is no case for elimination of import duties.

Here it may be noted that since the tariff reduction, as agreed between this new group of countries, will be implemented by them on MFN basis, India can reap the benefit of reduced tariff control in respect of export of these products, if any, from India. Hence there is no question of only reciprocal tariff reduction, as is omnipresent in all Free Trade Agreements.

Further, we see that there are countries like Brazil, Argentina and Mexico which are not part of the original ITA but are nevertheless substantial players in both import and export of information technology products. On the other hand, tariff elimination has not helped India on the expected lines. Though part of India's success story in the software sector can be attributed to the cut in import duties on computers,the hardware industry has not grown to that extent.

Finally, India still needs to protect its domestic industry from the aggressive or competitive pricing of its neighbors and other Asian exporters of IT products. This Information Technology Agreement and its expansion, as we understand is basically to help exporters of these products to gain foothold in the markets of the consuming countries. Here, it is not out of context to mention sub-title of the news item as carried in WTO's official website which precisely conveys the message. It reads "WTO members representing major exporters of information technology products agreed today (24 July) to eliminate tariffs on more than 200 such products." So it is the major "exporters" who have agreed to cut import tariffs. Were stakes of the importers taken into consideration?

[The author is associated with Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan, New Delhi and the views expressed are personal]

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.