News Update

Unveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesI-T- Secured creditor has priority charge over secured asset, over claims of I-T Department & other Departments; any excess amount recovered by Secured Creditor from auction of secured asset, over & above the dues payable to it, are to be remitted to the Departments: HCFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesI-T - Once assssee on year of reversal has paid taxes on excess provision and similar feature appeared in earlier years and assesee had payments for liquidated damages on delay of deliverables, no adverse inference can be drawn: HCFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerST - Software development service & IT-enabled service provided by assessee was exempt from tax during relevant period, by virtue of CBEC's Notification & Circular; demands raised for such period not sustainable: CESTATUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayCus - Order rejecting exporter's request for conversion of Shipping Bills on grounds that the same has been made by exporter beyond period of three months from date of Let Export Order in terms of CBEC Circular No. 36/2010-Cus : CESTATIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEACus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTATThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCX - As per settled law, a right acquired as result of a statutory provision, cannot be taken away retrospectively unless said statutory provision so provides or by necessary implication has such effect: CESTAT
 
Income tax - Whether assessee can claim deduction u/s 10A by making suo motu disallowance of reimbursement of expenses made by it - NO: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 02, 2015: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether the assessee can claim deduction u/s 10A by making suo-motu disallowance of reimbursement of expenses made by it. NO is the answer.

Facts of the case

The assessee is engaged in the business of software development and provides information technology services. The assessee had debited expenses reimbursed to its AE relating to onsite managers' salary and expenses. However, while computing the total income, the assessee disallowed the amount and was not claimed as deduction. During assessment, the TPO also did not examine this claim, since the assessee had informed him that it has suo-motu disallowed the payment made by it to its AE in relation to reimbursement of onsite managers' salary and expenses. The AO had further noticed that the assessee had claimed deduction u/s 10A an had disallowed identical claim made in the immediately preceding year also suo motu and the AO, in that year, had taken the view that the amount so disallowed cannot be considered as part of the income exempt u/s 10A. Therefore, held that the assessee was not entitled for deduction under section 10A in respect of the suo-motu disallowance of reimbursement of expenses made by the assessee.

The AO also noticed that the assessee had received a dividend income and claimed the same as exempt u/s 10(34). However, the assessee did not make any disallowance u/s 14A on the ground that it did not incur any expenditure for earning the dividend income. The AO did not accept the contentions of the assessee and accordingly disallowed 5% of the dividend income u/s 14A. On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the rejection of claim u/s 10A in respect of expenditure disallowed by the assessee suo motu, however, set aside the matter relating to the disallowance to be made u/s 14A.

The Tribunal held that,

+ we notice that the assessee had disallowed identical claim made in AY 2006- 07 and the same was also held to be not eligible for deduction u/s 10A by the assessing officer on the reasoning that the income pertaining to suo motu disallowance made by the assessee does not bear the character of income having nexus with the software development activity carried on by the assessee. The Tribunal has further noticed that the finding of the CIT(A) that the income arising out of the adjustment is not derived by the undertaking from the Export has not been controverted by the assessee. The Tribunal has further noticed that the assessee has not complied with the provisions of sec. 10A in respect of the suo-motu disallowance made by the assessee. In fact, it is the stand of the assessee that the reimbursements made by it was at ALP as evidenced by the report filed in Form 3CEB and it has also claimed the same as deduction by debiting the reimbursements as an item of expenditure in the Profit and loss account. Hence the suo-motu disallowance made by the assessee actually contradicts its stand taken by it in the financial statements as well as in the report furnished in Form 3CEB;

+ the assessee has determined the reimbursements at ALP in form no. 3CEB, whereas in M/s Agilisys IT services India Pvt Ltd, the ALP of sale receipts was determined at higher figure than that reported and hence due adjustments were made. In respect of the adjustments made due to the TP study was held to be not eligible for deduction u/s 10B by the Tribunal for the reasons stated therein. In effect, the sale price adjustment has not resulted in receipt of foreign exchange;

+ in the instant case also, the assessee has not generated any foreign exchange out of the suo-motu disallowance made by it. In fact, the assessee has actually spent money on reimbursements and hence there is no question of generating any income out of suo-motu disallowance of the expenditure incurred. Hence, in the absence of any income, it would not be possible to say that the suo-motu disallowance of any expenditure (which has already resulted in out go of money) would give rise to receipt of any money, which can be called as income generated out of software development activity. Thus, in our view, the ratio of the decision rendered in the case of Agilisys IT services India Pvt Ltd can be applied in the facts of the present case also. Even otherwise it is not a case of disallowance that is required to be made under the statutory provisions due to legal fiction. We notice that the Tribunal, while disposing of the identical issue in AY 2006-07, has taken into account the decision rendered by the Bangalore bench of Tribunal in the case of I Gate Global Solutions. Hence, for the additional reasons discussed and also by following the decision rendered by the Tribunal in AY 2006-07 on identical issue, we are of the view that the CIT(A) was justified in confirming the order of the AO in rejecting the claim for deduction u/s 10A of the Act in respect of suo-motu disallowance made by the assessee;

+ the next issue relates to the disallowance made u/s 14A of the Act. We notice that the CIT(A) had only set aside the issue to the file of the AO for fresh consideration in the light of decision rendered in the case of Godrej & Boyce mfg. Co. Ltd 2010-TIOL-564-HC-MUM-IT by the Bombay High Court. Hence, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of CIT(A) on this issue.

(See 2015-TIOL-1372-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023