News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
Flying Ash -Mere Mention in Tariff is not enough to levy Excise Duty - Madras High Court quashes demand at SCN Stage

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2670
25 08 2015
Tuesday

THE Excisability/dutiabilty of Fly Ash is a matter of debate/dispute for some years now.

History: Fly ash falling under chapter sub heading 26219000 was exempted till 28.02.2011, when a 1% duty was imposed by Notification No. 01/2011-CE dated 01.03.2011. The duty was increased from 1% to 2% vide notification No.16/2012 CE with effect from 17.03.2012 - without CENVAT Credit. There was also a duty of 5% and 6% with CENVAT Credit.

There was one school of thought that fly ash was not excisable at all and there was no need to exempt it. The 2011 Budget exercise of imposing 1% excise duty is therefore illegal.

Writing in our Guest Column on 05.05.2011 - Excisability and exemption, Advocate V. Ravindran observed,

The fundamental doubt that now arises in the minds of people concerned is whether the Government is trying to re-introduce and fasten duty liability on fly ash, which were declared to be not excisable.

Considering the fact the Ministry of Forest & Environment is taking so much of an effort in the area of pollution control in general and in particular in devising ways and means to dispose of fly-ash by thermal power stations across the country, the Finance Ministry would do well in consolidating the effort and not create conflict of interests through the attempted levy of excise duty.

Earlier the Board clarifies the matter, better would be results. Otherwise this would lead to a collision course between legislature and judiciary, besides igniting spate of litigations .

We carried an article by Advocate Joseph Prabakar on 09 05 2011 - Fly Ash generated in Thermal Power Plant - Applicability of Excise Duty. He observed,

‘Fly Ash' is generated in the course of manufacture or production of ‘Electrical energy' and apparently, it may seem that Fly Ash may be liable to Excise Duty.

However, it is important to note that vide Central Excise Notification No 89/95 dated May 18, 1995, the Government had exempted waste and scrap arising out of manufacture of exempted products from payment of Excise Duty.

‘Fly Ash' arising in the course of generation of electricity in a Thermal Power Plant would continue to be exempt from payment of Excise Duty under Notification No 89/95 dated May 18, 1995, notwithstanding the fact that the Government had notified ‘Fly Ash' under Notification No's. 1 and 2 of 2011 dated March 1, 2011.

We carried an article by Anu Nair on 13.05.2011 - The Coal Ash and Fly Ash Debate, where she took the stand:

But naturally, ‘Fly Ash' becomes chargeable to duty on account of withdrawal of exemption notification and as mentioned, it attracts 5% rate of duty in terms of notification no. 2/2011-CE, Sr. no. 14 of the same .

CA Sunil Kejriwal in his article on Fly Ash Excisability - 23.06.2014 noted,

However, excise duty still may not be leviable on fly ash for the reason that the same is not an outcome of any manufacturing process as held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. (supra) and the issuance of Notification No. 1/2011 and Notification No. 2/2011 may not be of any help to the department for fetching additional revenue.

With the issuance of the above notifications, the CBEC is once again required to clarify the position of law with respect to exigibility of fly ash which was settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court after a long litigation. The same would also facilitate non-cumbersome removal of polluting fly ash which the Ministry of Environment and Forests has been continuously striving for.

In 2014-TIOL-1088-CESTAT-MUM, the Mumbai Bench of the CESTAT observed, The issue is whether fly ash is a manufactured item or not. Merely because fly ash is marketed, it cannot be concluded that fly ash is “manufactured goods”. Inasmuch as the item was held to be non-excisable by the lower appellate authority relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of UOI Vs. Ahmedabad Electricity Co. - 2003-TIOL-17-SC-CX, the Revenue has not made out a case for grant of stay of the order. Accordingly, stay petition filed by the Revenue is dismissed.

But Revenue does not relent : Recently, this issue came up before the Madras High Court from a Show Cause Notice, praying for quashing of the Show Cause Notice.

What is Fly Ash? Fly Ash' is a fine powder recovered from the gases of burning coal during the production of electricity. Fly ash, also known as flue-ash, is one of the residues generated in combustion, and comprises the fine particles that rise with the flue gases. Ash which does not rise is termed bottom ash. In an industrial context, fly ash usually refers to ash produced during combustion of coal. Fly ash is generally captured by electrostatic precipitators or other particle filtration equipment before the flue gases reach the chimneys of coal-fired power plants, and together with bottom ash removed from the bottom of the furnace is in this case jointly known as coal ash. Depending upon the source and makeup of the coal being burned, the components of fly ash vary considerably, but all fly ash includes substantial amounts of silicon dioxide (SiO2) (both amorphous and crystalline) and calcium oxide (CaO), both being endemic ingredients in many coal-bearing rock strata.

The issue before this Court is, whether the 'fly ash' and 'fly ash bricks' included as items in the entries to the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, per se make the same exigible to excise duty?

The Revenue made a plea that electricity is not excisable, even though it finds a place in the tariff.

Why I mentioned above the articles we carried is because the High Court considered these very issues.

The High Court made some important observations:

It is clear that to be subjected to levy of excise duty "excisable goods" must be produced or manufactured in India. For being produced and manufactured in India, the raw material should have gone through the process of transformation into a new product by skillful manipulation. Excise duty is an incidence of manufacture and, therefore, it is essential that the product sought to be subjected to excise duty should have gone through the process of manufacture.

Simply because goods find mention in one of the entries of the First Schedule, does not mean that they become liable for payment of excise duty. It is essential that the goods have to satisfy the test of being produced or manufactured in India. Excise duty is a duty leviable only on the manufactured goods.

Fly ash has not gone under the process of manufacture and it cannot be said to be a manufactured product .

The High Court held that "fly ash" does not involve any manufacturing activity and it does not fall under the purview of excisable good so as to attract levy of excise duty.

The Show Cause Notice was set aside in so far as it concerned to the imposition of excise duty, interest and penalty in respect of 'fly ash' .

At least now the Department should stop this ash flying.

For more details of the case, please see Breaking News.

Simplification of procedure for Bonds to be submitted to Customs

IN a recent Trade Facilitation meeting in the JN Customs, an importer raised this issue:

There is facility to give yearly Bonds to Customs, however, practically not getting implemented. We give different bonds:

End use bonds for Advance licence (Exports).

For advance licence with EODC, for 1 licence if 20 imports take place, we give 20

bonds for post imports, whereas, for new licence registration for prior import, we give only one-time bond for all imports.

Our request to give One Time Bond licence wise for post import also.

The Department replied:

In this connection, it is to inform that for import under Advance Authorization, wherein, EODC has been issued by DGFT, the requirement of executing End use bond for each import at the time of importation has been prescribed under Exemption Notification itself.  As in case of clearance under Advance Authorization as per Notification 18/2015 Cus dated 01.04.2015, it is prescribed as under -

"that in respect of imports made after the discharge of export obligation in full, if facility under rule 18 (rebate of duty paid on materials used in the manufacture of resultant product) or “sub-rule (2) of rule 19 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 or of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has been availed, then the Importer shall, at the time of clearance of the imported materials furnish a bond to the Deputy Commissioner of Customs or Assistant Commissioner of Customs, as the case may be, binding himself, to sue (sic use) the imported materials in his factory or in the factory of his supporting manufacturer for the manufacture of dutiable goods and to submit a certificate, from the jurisdictional Central Excise officer or from a specified chartered accountant within six months from the date of clearance of the said materials, that the imported materials have been so used:

Provided that if the importer pays additional duty of customs leviable on the imported materials but for the exemption contained herein, then the imported materials may be cleared without furnishing a bond specified in this condition and the additional duty of customs so paid shall be eligible for availing CENVAT Credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004."

However, regarding execution of single continuity End Use Bond, as advised by the trade, its modalities with respect to ICES System and further monitoring thereof are being examined by the group.  Once such a system is finalized, it will be properly enforced & communicated by way of suitable Public Notice/Facility Notice.

The Law - When Officers get transferred

IN another Trade Facilitation meeting in the JN Customs, an importer submitted that while discharging their duties, Customs is also monitoring other allied acts and every time there is mass transfer of operational officers the trade faces difficulties with the new officers. He desired to know whether there is any standing mechanism for training, sensitizing the new officers.

The Department replied:

All the standing orders, public notices are uploaded on the JNCH website. Further, the department undertakes regular training of all the newly posted officers.

The fact is the Law is what the officer says it is and this view changes with the officer and as far as Customs is concerned, the officer is a few places above the Supreme Court. What you need is not the Law but the ability to convince the officer.

FTP - Onions - Minimum Export Price hiked sharply

DGFT has increased the Minimum Export Price of onions from USD 425 to USD 700 F.O.B. per Metric Ton.

Bangladesh newspapers prominently reported that Onion prices jumped in Bangladesh after India raised minimum export prices to USD 700 (Tk 54,460) per ton from USD 425 (Tk 33,065).

DGFT Notification No. 18/2015-2020, Dated: August 24, 2015

Get Ready for GST - FM to CBEC Officers

Legal Corner Icon

FINANCE Minister Arun Jaitley addressing the Chief Commissioners' conference of CBEC yesterday in New Delhi. He told the officers that they should be in readiness to implement the GST by having model draft laws and Information Technology preparedness.

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a nice day.

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@tiol.in


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023