News Update

Private equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate imagesEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; JaishankarAstronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Cus - As appeal has been restored after amendment of Sec 129E in August 2014, appellant directed to pay 7.5% of penalty in compliance to provisions of sec 129E: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 22, 2015: THE Commissioner of Customs (E.P), Mumbai passed an order deciding the product classification and also holding that the goods were liable for confiscation but since the goods were not available a fine of Rs.10 lakhs was imposed. A penalty of Rs.1 lakh is also imposed on the appellant. This order was passed on 29.08.2007.

The appeal filed against this order was dismissed by the Tribunal vide Order no. A/840/14/CSTB/C-I dt. 29/4/2014 on account of delay in filing the appeal.

The appellant filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court the same was allowed vide an order dated 23.03.2015.

We reported this order 2015-TIOL-1089-HC-MUM-CUS thus -

Cus - Order allegedly served by speed post - since Registered post and not Speed-Post is mentioned u/s 37-C of the CEA , 1944/s. 153 of Customs Act, 1962, service of notice by Speed-Post is not valid in law - even according to the Respondent Revenue, the order was sought to be served by Speed-Post and since there is not even an acknowledgement in token of service by the Speed-Post, there was no valid service in law - since the service of the o-in-o was not in accordance with law, the Tribunal was not justified in dismissing the application for condonation of delay - recourse to clause (b) of Section 153 would be permissible only in the event it is not possible to serve the order by the mode prescribed in clause (a) of the said Section - Order of Tribunal quashed and set aside - application for COD before Tribunal stands allowed: High Court [ para 9, 10, 11]

And thus the appeal was restored before the Tribunal.

The matter was heard recently and the Bench observed -

"2. As far as the fine is concerned, we find that the same cannot be imposed when the goods are not available for the confiscation. As regards the penalty, we find from the records that the appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal vide Order no. A/840/14/CSTB/C-I dt. 29/4/2014 on account of delay in filing the appeal. However, the same was restored by the Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai vide its order dt. 23.03.2015. As the appeal has been restored after the amendment of Section 129E in August 2014, we direct the appellants to pay 7.5% of the penalty i.e of Rs.7,500/- within two weeks from the date of this order in compliance to the provisions of section 129E of the Customs Act. On compliance being reported the remaining amount of penalty is waived and its recovery stayed till disposal of the appeal. Compliance to be reported on 10.08.2015."

Taking the clock back: s.129E - Provided further that the provisions of this section shall not apply to the stay applications and appeals pending before any appellate authority prior to the commencement of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014.

(See 2015-TIOL-1765-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.