News Update

Gold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
Mandatory pre-deposit of fixed percentage of duty & penalty - Amended provisions of Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 do not apply for appeals filed and pending as on date of amendment: High Court

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, JUNE 16, 2015: RECENTLY, we carried an order by the Mumbai Tribunal [2015-TIOL-1093-CESTAT-MUM] holding that the amended provisions of pre-deposit would apply to all the appeals filed on or after the amendment, though the dispute pertains to the period prior to the amendment of the provisions. But what about the cases pending before the Tribunal as on the date of amendment?

In this case, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit Rs 25 lakhs against a demand of Rs 2.49 crores. The assessee contested that as per the amended provisions of Section 35F, the amount of pre-deposit is only 7.5% of the duty demand.

The Appellant relied on the judgment of Rajasthan High Court in the Case of Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India and Others, Appeal No. 1 of 2015 decided on 12.2.2015 wherein a Division Bench has opined that in view of the amended Section 35F, the benefit of deposit of 7.5% only must be extended to the appellant in appeal which had been filed prior to the enforcement of the amended Section 35F i.e. 6th August, 2014. Any other direction will be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

However, the High Court did not agree with the preposition as laid down in the said judgment of the Rajasthan High Court in the case of Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Limited.

The High Court held that from a simple reading of Section 35F, which is not under challenge, it cannot be disputed that the provision of Section 35F as amended vide Finance Act 2 of 2014 w.e.f 6th August, 2014 will have no application on the appeals which were filed and were pending before the Tribunal prior to the said date.

It is settled law that if the language of the statute is simple and admits of only one meaning than no rule of interpretation is to be applied and the simple meaning has to be given effect to.

Accordingly, the High Court declined to interfere with the order of pre-deposit by the Tribunal.

In passing:  Also see Arjun Industries 2015-TIOL-1364-HC-RAJ-CUS.

(See 2015-TIOL-1449-HC-ALL-CX)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.