News Update

Elected Women of PRIs to Participate in CPD57 in New YorkIndia, New Zealand to have deeper collaboration in Pharma, Agriculture and Food ProcessingIndia’s manufacturing PMI marginally slides to 58.8 in April monthDefence Secretary & Secretary General of MoD, Indonesia to co-chair 7th Joint Committee meetingAbove 7000 Yoga enthusiasts practised Common Yoga Protocol in SuratManeka Gandhi declares assets worth Rs 97 Cr and files nomination papers from SultanpurGlobal Debt & Fiscal Silhouette rising! Do Elections contribute to fiscal slippages?ISRO study reveals possibility of water ice in polar cratersGST - Statutory requirement to carry the necessary documents should not be made redundant - Mistake committed by appellant is not extending e-way bill after the expiry, despite such liberty being granted under the Rules attracts penalty: HCBiden says migration has been good for US economyGST - Tax paid under wrong head of IGST instead of CGST/SGST - 'Relevant Date' for refund would be the date when tax is paid under the correct head: HCUS says NO to Rafah operation unless humanitarian plan is in place + Colombia snaps off ties with IsraelGST - Petitioner was given no opportunity to object to retrospective cancellation of registration - Order is also bereft of any details: HCMay Day protests in Paris & Istanbul; hundreds arrestedGST - Proper officer should have at least considered the reply on merits before forming an opinion - Ex facie, proper officer has not applied his mind: HCSaudi fitness instructor jailed for social media post - Amnesty International seeks releaseGST - A Rs.17.90 crores demand confirmed on Kendriya Bhandar by observing that reply is insufficient - Non-application of mind is clearly written all over the order: HCDelhi HC orders DGCA to deregister GO First’s aircraftGST - Neither the SCN nor the order spell the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, they are set aside: HCIndia successfully tests SMART anti-submarine missile-assisted torpedo systemKiller heatwave kills hundreds of thousands of fish in Southern VietnamHong Kong struck by close to 1000 lightningColumbia Univ campus turns into ‘American Gaza’ - Pro-Palestinian students & counter-protesters clashMissile-Assisted Release of Torpedo system successfully flight-tested by DRDO
 
CX - Finished goods destroyed in fire - Remission of duty - expression 'unavoidable accident' requires to be given liberal meaning lest provisions are rendered altogether otiose - fire on account of short circuit has to be held as covered by expression - appellant is eligible: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 12, 2015: THE appellants are engaged in the manufacturing of bulk drugs. A fire broke out in the factory of the appellants on 17.05.06. In the fire, raw material, finished goods, and some machinery were destroyed. On 22.05.2006 appellant intimated the jurisdictional Central Excise Officers, who verified the stock.

In the investigation conducted by the Police department and the fire department it was revealed that the fire broke out due to short circuit near reaction vessel.

At the instance of the department, the appellant debited Rs. 25,63,919/- on 18.08.2006, Under Protest, being the Cenvat Credit involved in the inputs contained in the finished goods as well as the raw material itself which got destroyed in the fire.

Later, on 14.05.2007 the Appellants filed remission application before the Commissioner of Central Excise seeking remission of duty on the finished goods amounting to Rs. 19,43,890/-.

The CCE, Thane-II rejected the claim on the ground that conditions of Rule 21 of CER, 2002 were not fulfilled inasmuch it was observed that the fire could have been avoided or in the event of fire, damage to the goods could have been minimized, had the assessee taken adequate steps to prevent the fire and had the assessee installed electrical equipment to prevent the electrical short circuits. The adjudicating authority also observed that though the employees of the Appellant's company made laudable efforts in saving the lives of the workers and in preventing any casualty, no significant efforts were made simultaneously to extinguish the fire or prevent the loss caused to the excisable goods on which remission is claimed.

As against these bombastic findings, the appellant is before the CESTAT and relies on the decision of Rajasthan High Court in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. - 2008-TIOL-636-HC-RAJ-CX, where it was held that the expression "unavoidable accidents" requires to be given a reasonable and liberal meaning lest the provisions of Rule 21 are rendered altogether otiose, as it can always be contended, that the accident could be avoided, by taking recourse to one or more measures and that a bit liberal rather more practical approach is required to be taken in that matter. The appellant also relies on the decision in Lord Chloro Alkali Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-2420-CESTAT-DEL where it was observed that it is well settled that nobody intentionally invites such accidents and they happen on account of various natural causes. The decision in the case of M. Kumar Udyog Private Ltd. - 2014-TIOL-1491-CESTAT-DEL wherein involving almost identical facts, the Tribunal had held that when the fire admittedly broke out on account of short circuits it has to be held as covered by the expression "unavoidable accident" was also relied upon. In the matter of the praise heaped on the employees of the appellants company but nonetheless rejection of the remission claim, the appellant submitted that the same was not a sustainable ground as in the event of any such accident, the top priority would be given to save human life rather than saving/protecting the goods.

The AR submitted that the CCE, Thane-II was correct in rejecting the remission claim.

The Bench held that the case is squarely covered by the judgment of High Court of Rajasthan in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. and the Tribunal's decision in the case of M. Kumar Udyog (P) Ltd. and, therefore, the appellant is eligible for claim of remission of duty.

The order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

(See 2015-TIOL-1110-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.