News Update

Unveil One Nation; One Debt Code; One Compliance Rule for Centre & StatesChina moves WTO against US tax subsidies for EVs & renewable energyMore on non-doms - The UK Spring Budget 2024 (See TII Edit)Notorious history-sheeter Mukhtar Ansari succumbs to cardiac arrest in UP jailTraining Program for Cambodian civil servants commences at MussoorieNY imposes USD 15 congestion taxCBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silver45 killed as bus races into ravine in South AfricaCBIC directs all Customs offices to remain open on Saturday & SundayBankman-Fried jailed for 25 yrs in FTX scamI-T- Once the citizen deposits the tax upon coming to know of his liability, it cannot be said that he has deliberately or willfully evaded the depositing of tax and interest in terms of Section 234A can be waived: HCHouthis attack continues in Red Sea; US military shoots down 4 dronesI-T- Secured creditor has priority charge over secured asset, over claims of I-T Department & other Departments; any excess amount recovered by Secured Creditor from auction of secured asset, over & above the dues payable to it, are to be remitted to the Departments: HCFederal Govt hands out USD 60 mn to rebuild collapsed bridge in BaltimoreI-T - Receipts of sale of scrap being part & parcel of activity and being proximate thereto would also be within ambit of gains derived from industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-IB: HCCanadian School Boards sue social media titans for 4 bn Canadian dollar in damagesI-T - Once assssee on year of reversal has paid taxes on excess provision and similar feature appeared in earlier years and assesee had payments for liquidated damages on delay of deliverables, no adverse inference can be drawn: HCFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerST - Software development service & IT-enabled service provided by assessee was exempt from tax during relevant period, by virtue of CBEC's Notification & Circular; demands raised for such period not sustainable: CESTATUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayCus - Order rejecting exporter's request for conversion of Shipping Bills on grounds that the same has been made by exporter beyond period of three months from date of Let Export Order in terms of CBEC Circular No. 36/2010-Cus : CESTATIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEACus - No Cess is payable when Basic Customs Duty is found to be Nil: CESTATThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCX - As per settled law, a right acquired as result of a statutory provision, cannot be taken away retrospectively unless said statutory provision so provides or by necessary implication has such effect: CESTAT
 
Service Tax - providing of 'gear boys' and 'deck foremen' by association of stevedores to its members - Prima facie covered by High Court decisions - Stay petition allowed unconditionally

By TIOL News Service

BANGALORE, MAY 22, 2015 : THE appellant is an association of stevedores registered under the Societies Registration Act as a non-profitable association with an aim to solve the day-to-day problems of its members as regards providing of "gear boys" and "deck foremen". Revenue by entertaining a view that such activity of the appellant amounts to providing services falling under the category of 'Manpower Recruitment and Supply', raised the demand for the period April 2005 to March 2010, by invoking the longer period of limitation. The said demand stands confirmed to the tune of Rs.2,13,99,842/- (Rupees Two Crores Thirteen Lakhs Ninety Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and Forty Two only). There is a small demand of around Rs. 8,000/- (Rupees Eight Thousand approximately) under the category of Club or Association service.

The contention of the advocate appearing in support of the stay petition is that:

1. the appellant is not a commercial concern as envisaged under the 'Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency' definition. They are an association of various stevedore members for the purpose of supply of various persons on the basis of intends raised by the members.

2. As such the entire activity is based upon the mutuality of interest between the assessees and its members and cannot be held to be an activity liable to service tax.

3. apart from supplying the gear boys and deck foremen to its members, they are not supplying any such persons to any other person who is not a member of the association.

4. As such by relying upon the Jharkhand High Court's decision in the case of Ranchi Club Ltd. Vs. Chief Commr. of C. EX. & S.T, Ranchi Zone - 2012-TIOL-1031-HC-JHARKHAND-ST as also by relying upon the Gujarat High Court's decision in the case of Sports Club of Gujarat Ltd. Vs. Union of India - 2013-TIOL-528-HC-AHM-ST, there is a mutuality of interest between the society's association and its members and services are being provided to the members only, the activity cannot be held exigible to service tax.

5. The latest decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry Vs. CST, Delhi - 2014-TIOL-701-CESTAT-DEL., wherein by taking note of the above 2 decisions of the Hon'ble High Courts, the Tribunal has held that where the services provided are in the nature of charitable services to its members, the consideration received from the members cannot be held liable to service tax.

6. even if they would have paid the service tax, the same was available as credit to the various stevedore members who could have utilized the same for payment of service tax by them. As such the entire situation is revenue neutral.

The advocate also assails the impugned order on the point of limitation. By submitting that the association was incorporated in 1959 and has been working since then by adopting the same methodology. Inasmuch as the issue was debatable, it cannot be said that the service tax was not paid by them with a malafide intention. He clarified that no service tax stands collected by the association from its individual members to whom service has been provided.

The Tribunal found that the issue is prima facie covered by the Gujarat High Court and Jharkhand High Court decisions as also by the Tribunal decision in the case of Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry. Apart from that Tribunal also prima facie found favour in the appellant's contention that demand is barred by limitation. On this ground Tribunal was of the view that appellant has a good prima facie case in its favour so as to allow the stay petition unconditionally. Ordered accordingly.

(See 2015-TIOL-921-CESTAT-BANG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023