News Update

20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTATBlinken says China trying to interfere US Presidential pollsWorld Energy Congress 2024: IREDA CMD highlights need for Innovative Financing Solutions
 
Non-refund of Pre-deposit made in Revision case consequent to favourable order by HC - Whether Court has become functus officio in Tax case originally disposed? - HC directs Respondent to refund amount along with interest

By TIOL News Service

CHENNAI, MAY 12, 2015: PETITIONER made deposit of Rs 1.50 Crores pursuant to direction in interim order dated 03.08.2010 of the High Court, passed in Tax Revision case. Petitioner succeeded in the revision on 21.03.2014 and thereafter filed an application to the Department on 29.05.2014 seeking refund of the amount deposited. Department did not respond despite reminder and the Petitioner filed writ petition in the High Court. Writ Petition was dismissed by the High Court on the ground that the Petitioner should approach the Tax Court.

Thereafter, petitioner pursued the matter by way of Writ appeal and the Division Bench on 23.01.2015 directed the Petitioner to file a miscellaneous application in the tax case revision.

In consequence to the order of the Division Bench in the writ appeal, Petitioner filed Miscellaneous Petition in Tax case Revision. The High Court entertained a doubt as to whether such a Miscellaneous Petition could be filed before this Court after the Tax Case (Revisions) was disposed of finally on 21.03.2014, since the Court would become functus officio.

The High Court observed that the respondent- department did not file any appeal against the order of the High Court. Further, the Court observed that the Respondent did not comply with the Order of the High Court in Tax Case revision causing grave injustice to the petitioner by not refunding the amount deposited by the Petitioner.

The moot question before the High Court was whether after disposal of the Tax Case Revision, High Court could entertain further Miscellaneous Petition, even if such petition did not touch upon the merits of the matter that has already been decided. The Court observed that under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to secure the ends of justice or prevent abuse of process of Court, the Court can, in exercise of its inherent powers, ensure that the orders passed by the Court are complied with.

The High Court, relying on the decisions of the Supreme Court on the inherent powers of the Court under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, allowed the Miscellaneous Petition and directed the department to refund the amount along with interest.

(See 2015-TIOL-1229-HC-MAD-VAT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.