News Update

Apple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedGST - Tax liability was imposed because petitioner replied without annexing documents - It is just and appropriate that an opportunity be provided to contest tax demand on merits, albeit by putting petitioner on terms: HCMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsGST - Petitioner has failed to avail opportunities granted repeatedly - Court cannot entertain request for remand as there has been no procedural impropriety and infraction of any provision by assessing authority: HCNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!GST - Classification - Matter which had stood examined by Principal Commissioner is being treated differently by Additional Commissioner - Prima facie , approach appears to be perverse: HCI-T- Denial of deduction u/s 80IC can create perception of genuine hardship, where claimant paid tax in excess of what was due; order denying deduction merits re-consideration: HCIsrael launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 pollsGermany disfavours Brazil’s proposal to tax super-richI-T- If material found during search are not incriminating in nature AO can not made any addition u/s 153A in respect of unabated assessment: ITATGovt appoints Dinesh Tripathi as New Navy ChiefAFMS, IIT Kanpur to develop tech to address health problems of soldiersFBI sirens against Chinese hackers eyeing US infrastructureKenya’s top military commanders perish in copter crashCBIC notifies Customs exchange rates w.e.f. April 19, 2024Meta shares ‘Most Intelligent’ AI assistant built on Llama modelDengue cases soaring in US - Close to ‘Emergency situation’: UN Agency
 
Cus - Multifunction machines are different and distinct from photocopying machines and,therefore, during period prior to amendment of FTP w.e.f 5.6.2012, import of these goods did not require any import licence: CESTAT by Majority

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, MAR 31, 2015: THIS is a Revenue appeal. The issue is as to whether Digital Multifunction Printing and copying Machines (Old and used), imported prior to 05.06.2012 are hit by Para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy, which placed the same under the restricted category with effect from 05.06.2012. It is seen that prior to the said date, only photocopier were listed under the said Para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy for the purposes of requirement of licence.

After the matter was heard, there was a difference in opinion between the Members of the Division Bench and, therefore, the matter came to be referred to the third Member for a majority view.

The following is the difference of opinion:-

Whether the Digital Multifunction printing and photocopying machines imported prior to 6.6.2012 do not require a license for importation of the same as held by Member (Judicial) or the same require a license for importation as held by Member (Technical)?

We reported this as 2014-TIOL-649-CESTAT-DEL.

The third Member (T) on reference has passed an order recently.

It is inter alia observed –

+ During the period prior to 5.6.2012, in terms of para 2.17 of the Exim Policy, while import of the second hand capital goods was allowed freely, second hand personal computer, photocopier machines, air conditioner and DG sets shall be allowed only against an import licence;

+ During the period prior to 5.6.2012, para 2.17 did not cover the "Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines" and this item was made a restricted item for import only w.e.f. 05.06.2012;

+ As is clear from the minutes of 24th meeting of Technical Review Committee held on 16.11.2011, the Committee recommended to the DGFT for the necessary amendment to restrict the import of second hand Digital Multifunction Print and Copier Machines;

+ In view of the recommendation of the Technical Review Committee, para 2.17 of the Exim Policy was amended w.e.f. 05.06.2012 to specifically include the second hand Digital Multifunction Print and Copier Machines.

+ In view of this, during the period prior to 5.6.2012, the old & used / second hand multifunction machines could be freely imported and no import licence was required. [Shivam International - 2011-TIOL-851-CESTAT-BANG relied upon]

+ If the word 'photocopier machines' also covered the "Digital Multifunction Print and copying machines", there would have been no necessity for the DGFT to specifically include the second hand multifunction machines in para 2.17 of the Exim Policy.

In fine, the third Member on reference agreed with the decision of Member (Judicial).

So, by a Majority order, all the appeals filed by the Revenue were rejected.

(See 2015-TIOL-585-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.