News Update

Jio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficIndia takes part in 'Institutionalization of SMART Government for Improving Service Delivery' in LondonGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his health'Sunflowers were the first ones to know' - film by FTII student selected at CannesSARFAESI Act - Award of interest on auction money at rate applicable to fixed deposits is not a correct view and rate of interest deserves to be enhanced: SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')ST - Chit Funds - Tax was not paid under mistake of law but upon demand by tax authorities - Refund not having been filed within time was rightly rejected: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Without considering reply on merits, proper officer has held that reply is unsatisfactory and, therefore, he is left with no alternative but to create demand - Order set aside: HCGST - Cancellation of registration retrospectively - Show Cause Notice and the impugned order are bereft of any details, accordingly the same cannot be sustained: HCGST - Registration could not have been cancelled retrospectively for the period for which returns were filed and taxpayer was compliant: HCGST - Notfn 11/2017-CTR amended by 03/2022 - Work contracts executed before 18 July 2022 - Petitioners should file refund claims before respondent agitating grievance and same be examined and orders passed within 4 months: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesGST - Entire tax liability has been realised by appropriating the amount from the petitioner's bank account, therefore, Revenue interest stands fully secured - Since tax proposal was confirmed without participation of petitioner, order set aside and matter remanded: HCCaste Census is my mission, says RahulRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case
 
Section 76 discourages right to litigate

MARCH 01, 2015

By Monarch Bhatt

THE Finance Minister has proposed to substitute section 76 wherein, a mandatory penalty of 10% has been proposed in different scenarios. The important point is to be noted here is that the penalty under section 76 will be attracted in a cases, where there is no fraud or collusion or willful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of any of the provision of the Act or rules has not been made with the intent to evade payment of Service Tax.

The penalty under section 76 will not be levied, if the person who has been served with the show cause notice under section 73(1), discharges the service tax alongwith interest within 30 days from the serving of show cause notice.

In case the order has been passed by the central excise officer, the penalty under section 76 shall be 25% of the penalty imposed in the order, if service tax alongwith interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of passing of the order.

Similarly, in case service tax amount is reduced by the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) or of the Appellate Tribunal or of the Court, the penalty payable under section 76 will be 25% of the penalty amount, if service tax alongwith interest and reduced penalty is paid within 30 days of passing of such order.

Therefore, as per the proposed amendment to section 76, if assessee does not challenge the show cause notice itself and discharges the service tax alongwith interest within 30 days, then only penalty will not be leviable. If assessee challenges the same and does not succeed, assessee has to pay mandatory amount of penalty under section 76.

The proposed section 76 overrides all the decided cases of Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein in a number of cases including the case of Pushpam Pharmaceuticals - 2002-TIOL-235-SC-CX , Cosmic Dye Chemical - 2002-TIOL-236-SC-CX-LB, Hindustan Steels Ltd. - 2002-TIOL-148-SC-CT-LB held that to impose the penalty there must be mala-fide intention with intent to evade payment of taxes. As per the proposed section 76, the penalty is leviable even though there is no mala-fide intension for evasion taxes.

In my view, it is threat to the assessee, to forgo the right of litigation and choose the option of making payment as per the show cause notice and get immunity from the penalty under section 76. Assessee can definitely challenge the same as it is legal right of the assessee and no law can be formed to discourage the assessee from claiming their rights.

( DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Section 76 discourages right to litigate

like other fms mr. jetly also could not realise his core duty to ensure that simultaneously he has to bring provisions to make law clear, to have pressure on the officers to not to raise fake, baseless scns which are 80% in nos.

section 80 delete kar dee hai so no body can stablish bona fide belief.

billing par hi paisa bhar do ye bhi kanoon hai. bad debts written off and approved by auditors bhi aapko manya nahi hai....aur middle class ka budget bata rahe hain.

penalty jindagi bhar aaram aur haram ki kamai khane wale aur fir chain se pension ka sukh bhogne wale afsaron par kyon nahi hai...

tribunal me agar deptt. haarta hai to scn issue karne wale officer par ek saal ki salary ke barabar penalty lagaiye na.

1 se lekar 10% tak ki penalty me kis rate se lagani hai ye bhi officer ki marji aur mercy par rahega.....


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.