News Update

Italy imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesCaste Census is my mission, says RahulRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranI-T- Income surrendered before approaching Settlement Commission not covered u/s 115BBE, where this provision did not exist during relevant AYs: HCChinese companies decry anti-subsidy probe by EUI-T- Entire interest expenditure is allowable as deduction if loan funds is not diverted for non-income earning activities/personal purposes : ITATUK’s key water supplier, Thames Water, slips into financial quagmireI-T- Sale consideration cannot be considered as unexplained cash credit if sale takes place in online platform and sale consideration is received through stock broker in banking channels : ITATUK to send military aid package worth USD 619 mn to UkraineI-T- Section 69C includes expenditures reflected in account books, as well as those discovered during Search & Seizure for which no valid explanation is forthcoming from assessee: ITATUS regulator bans non-compete agreements by employeesI-T- Penalty imposed u/s 273B upheld where assessee unable to provide just cause for failure to file audit report within prescribed due date as per Section 44AB: ITATPalestinian PM unveils new reform packageI-T- Assessee cannot contest validity of penalty notice on grounds of irrelevant provision not being struck off, by highlighting such defect for the first time before ITAT itself: ITATAir India, Nippon Airways join hands for travel between India and JapanGovt receives 7 bids for giga-scale Advanced Chemistry Cell under PLI10 killed as two Malaysian Military copters crashI-T- Lower authorities erred in disallowing long term capital loss : ITATSC grills Baba Ramdev & Balkrishna in misleading ad case1351 candidates to contest in phase 3 of LS ElectionsI-T- Revisionary order u/s 263 invalidated where passed in ignorance of repeated factual submissions to prove that original assessment order is not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue's interests: ITATIndian Coast Guard, Oman Coast Guard to jointly combat transnational illegal activities at seaST - Department cannot retain any amount which is otherwise not payable by the Assessee; nothing acts as embargo on assessee's right to demand refund of tax paid under misaken notion: CESTATAFMS, ICMR join hands to undertake biomedical research for Armed ForcesCus - If noticee seeks Cross Examination of such persons, same should be granted, appellant will produce all documentary evidence before Adjudicating Authority in support of their claim that seized gold is part of their normally procured gold in course of their commercial transactions: CESTAT
 
Recovery of credit taken wrongly but not utilized is possible now - First accrued is first utilized - new Rule 14 of CCR, 2004

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, FEB 28, 2015: TAKE a look at the new rule 14 brought by notification 6/2015-CE(NT) dated 01.03.2015.

It reads -

14. Recovery of CENVAT credit wrongly taken or erroneously refunded. -

(1) (i) Where the CENVAT credit has been taken wrongly but not utilised, the same shall be recovered from the manufacturer or the provider of output service, as the case may be, and the provisions of section 11A of the Excise Act or section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), as the case may be, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries;

(ii) Where the CENVAT credit has been taken and utilised wrongly or has been erroneously refunded, the same shall be recovered along with interest from the manufacturer or the provider of output service, as the case may be, and the provisions of sections 11A and 11AA of the Excise Act or sections 73 and 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, as the case may be, shall apply mutatis mutandis for effecting such recoveries.

(2) For the purposes of sub-rule (1), all credits taken during a month shall be deemed to have been taken on the last day of the month and the utilisation thereof shall be deemed to have occurred in the following manner, namely: -

(i)  the opening balance of the month has been utilised first;

(ii)  credit admissible in terms of these rules taken during the month has been utilised next;

(iii)  credit inadmissible in terms of these rules taken during the month has been utilised thereafter.

The first thing that hits one is the usage of the words “taken wrongly but not utilized” and “taken and utilized” in two separate clauses in sub-rule (1).

And the reason for this -the earlier rule envisaged recovery of CENVAT credit ONLY IF IT WAS TAKEN & UTILIZED WRONGLY.

This, the TRU letter humbly states as - CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 are also being amended to Provide for recovery of CENVAT Credit taken but NOT utilized.

Thankfully,the new rule 14 continues to mention that one need not pay any interest if the CENVAT credit wrongly taken is NOT utilized.

And if it is utilized, the credit is deemed to have been taken on the last day of the month &computation of interest in terms of section 11AA of the CEA, 1944 on the utilized amount will be done thus -

+ the opening balance of the month has been utilised first;

+ credit admissible in terms of these rules taken during the month has been utilised next;

+ credit inadmissible in terms of these rules taken during the month has been utilised thereafter.

All these deeming clauses because section 11AA (2) warranting payment of interest on delayed payment of duty mentions -

"…such interest shall be calculated from the date on which such duty becomes due up to the date of actual payment of the amount due."

Whether this is a measure of simplification, only time will tell!


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.