News Update

Israel shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
I-T - Whether when assessee did not develop entire infrastructure project and carried out only a part of work, it can still claim Sec 80IA(4) benefits - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 06, 2015: THE issue before the Bench is - when the assessee did not develop an infrastructure project and carried out only a part of the work, it can still claim Sec 80IA(4) benefits. YES is the answer.

Facts of the case

Assessee
is engaged in development of infrastructure facilities. A JV agreement was entered with 'NS'. Assessee was awarded contracts one by Hyderabad Metropolitan Water supply & Sewerage Board for augmentation of drinking water supply to Hyderabad City & other by Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation for Godavari Water supply Project. AO rejected the claim of assessee u/s 80IA(4) stating that the contract awarded to the assessee, it contributed only part of the whole Krishna water supply project and therefore the work of the assessee was not regarding entire water supply project. Installation and commissioning of pipe lines alone does not constitute whole water supply project. Thus, it was held that assessee is only a contractor who was awarded a contract to set up only a part of the whole Krishna drinking water supply project and the assessee did not have either control or domain over facility being developed and no risk was borne by the assessee as far as the work executed by them is concerned.

After hearing both the parties, the ITAT held that,

++ in the preceding assessment years, it was held by ITAT that for claiming deduction under section 80 IA(4), it is not necessary for the assessee to develop the entire project in order to qualify for a deduction under section 80 IA(4). If the provisions are so construed then it will be a condition impossible of compliance because of the magnitude of the entire project. For qualifying deduction u/s 80 IA(4) what would be necessary will be that the work carried on by the assessee must be an integral part of the project and if it is so, then it cannot be said that assessee is not eligible for deduction u/s 80 IA(4) for the reason that the assessee on its own did not develop an infrastructure project. Therefore, observations of the AO that assessee did not develop an infrastructure project and only part of the work was carried out cannot disentitle the assessee to claim the deduction;

++ after section 80IA was amended by Finance Act, 2001, the section applies to an enterprise carrying on the business of (i) developing; or (ii) operating and maintaining; or (iii) developing, operating and maintaining any infrastructure facility which fulfills certain conditions. The amendment made by Parliament to section 80-IA(4) of the Act set the matter beyond any controversy by stipulating that the three conditions for development, operation and maintenance were not intended to be cumulative in nature". Therefore, only development of infrastructure project is sufficient to make entitle an enterprise to be eligible for deduction under section 80 IA(4). Thus assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 80IA(4).

(See 2015-TIOL-136-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.