News Update

Israel-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?I-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCIsrael finally moving ahead with Rafah OperationsGST - Registration cancelled retrospectively on ground that physical verification revealed that the firm was non-existent - Petitioner had informed that they shifted business and had sought cancellation of registration - Order cancelling registration modified: HCNorway oil major boss says Europeans are not hard-working as compared to AmericansGST - Since registration was cancelled, petitioner could not access portal and view the SCNs and file replies - Order set aside and matter remitted: HCJio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficGST - Reply filed is a detailed one and if the proper officer was of the view that the same was unsatisfactory, he should have specifically sought further details - Matter is remitted: HCGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his healthGST - SCN does not put petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively - Order set aside and registration restored: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Non-application of mind - Proper officer has merely observed that the reply filed is unclear and unsatisfactory and, therefore, the demand is confirmed - Matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesCommercial Tax - Judgment of High Court is in jeopardy once appeal is entertained by Supreme Court - Appeals shall remain pending before the Appellate Board, Bench at Indore, till the issue is decided by Apex Court: HCUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranST - As the job-work undertaken by appellant amounts to manufacture, service tax cannot be levied on them under both Heads 'Business Auxiliary Service' and 'Business Support Service': CESTATRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyCX - Existence of corroborative evidence is essential in order to establish clandestine removal of goods and same cannot be merely based on assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT
 
Refund of mandatory pre-deposit made from CENVAT credit account

JANUARY 31, 2015

By S B Parikh

AS per the new provisions for filing of appeals, mandatory pre-deposit @7.5% / 10% is required to be made under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended w.e.f. 06.08.2014 vide the Finance (No.2) Act, 2014. Further, interest on refund of such pre-deposits (made on or after 06.08.2014) is required to be paid by Department for the period from the date of pre-deposit till the date of refund under Section 35FF. These provisions have also been made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended). As per Para 5.2 of CBEC & Circular No. 984/08/2014-CX dated 16.09.2014, in all cases where the appellate authority has decided the matter in favour of the appellant, refund with interest should be paid within 15 days of the receipt of the letter of appellant seeking refund.

As per the Circular F.No. 15/CESTAT/General/2013-14 dated 28.08.2014 issued by Registrar of CESTAT, New Delhi, mandatory deposit of duty can be made from CENVAT Credit account and the appellant has to produce evidence thereof while filing appeal.

Suppose an assessee has made pre-deposit from CENVATcredit account. After few years, appellate authority passes order in favour of the assessee/appellant. Naturally, Department will not give cash refund, but allow re-credit in CENVAT credit account. In the following situations, at the time of getting refund in CENVAT credit account, the assessee may not be able to utilize it:

++ Closure of business

++ Final product becomes exempted

++ Assessee avails SSI exemption

++ Assessee stops manufacturing of dutiable goods

++ Assessee has accumulated CENVAT credit

In above situations, assessee may claim cash refund of pre-deposit. No clarification is available as to whether refund of pre-deposit made from CENVAT credit account can be given in cash or not.

It is also not clarified whether interest on refund of such pre-deposit (made from CENVAT credit account) has to be given in cash or in CENVAT credit account. On going through the statutory provisions of Section 35F and 35FF, it appears that in all cases of refund of pre-deposit made on or after 06.08.2014, interest has to be paid in cash. There is no provision for payment of interest by Department in CENVAT credit account. So, it is felt that interest is payable in cash even though pre-deposit was made from CENVAT credit account.

In order to avoid litigation, clarification about mode of payment of such refund of pre-deposit and interest may be issued by the CBEC.  

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Refund of mandatory pre-deposit made from CENVAT credit account

do we expect board to be prompt enough in clarifying that the interest shall be paid in cash;that too only when the output liability was discharged by compelled lesser utilisation of cenvat due to pre deposit.
since in case of no utilisation from cenvat account, amount shall be allowed to the fullest extent in cenvat credit account after the order in favor.

Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.