News Update

India, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonI-T - Income so surrendered on account of investment in excess stock during course of survey cannot be brought to tax under deeming provisions of section 69B: ITATMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilI-T-Power of revision need not be exercised where facts do not reveal any lack of enquiry by AO into relevant issue & when twin requirements of order being erroneous as well as prejudicial to Revenue's interests, are not satisfied: ITATThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageI-T -Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed where an assessee claims deduction u/s 80P while being ineligible therefor, but being under the bona fide impression of being eligible for such benefit : ITATYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingCus - Enhancement of declared value of imported goods is not tenable, where Department adduces no material to show how the enhanced value was computed & where no cogent rationale is made out for rejecting declared value: CESTATMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionST - When the facts are in the knowledge of department subsequent SCN alleging suppression cannot be issued and entire demand was found beyond normal period of limitation: CESTATFM Nirmala Sitharaman declines to contest LS elections as she has no fundsST - Tripura State Rifles not required to pay Service Tax under heading of Security Services, as it is is not engaged in business of providing security services: CESTATJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of LokpalCX - Clandestine removal alleged based on consumption of raw inputs and heightened electricity usage - Tax demands based on third party statements but without permitting cross examination of deponents; case remanded to allow this exercise: CESTAT
 
Resolve all issues resulting from disbanding of Planning Commission

JANUARY 19, 2015

By TIOL Edit Team

THE NDA Government's decision to replace Planning Commission with National Institution for Transforming India (NITI Aayog) requires guarded welcome. Guarded because it has left a lot of issues unanswered.

The positive element of the decision is that it reflects the Government's urge to meet the public's growing aspirations through a directional shift in policies. The Cabinet resolution on formation of NITI has also aptly focused on formulation of policies that should be pursued within the framework of cooperative federalism.

The public can now look forward to knowing the "Bharatiya approach to development" which NITI as the policy think tank would roll out.

It would also be interesting to watch how this nascent institution performs its mandate to serve as "a platform for resolution of inter-sectoral and inter-departmental issues in order to accelerate the implementation of the development agenda."

The crucial issue is whether the Union Cabinet and the States would accept NITI's recommendations on issues on which ministries and sector's stakeholders take conflicting and non-compromising stand.

It is moot point whether Planning Commission should have been reformed or disbanded. No one can, however, deny that Planning Commission required to be cut to size. It encroached into other ministries turf by creating administrative structures under its fold. A case in point is National Rainfed Area Authority (NRAA), which should have under the domain of Agriculture Ministry. NRAA ended up doing the same job that is performed by the Ministry and its different entities.

Another case in point is Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) which was formed to introduce and govern Aadhar for all residents of the country. This is a 12-digit individual identification number that serves as a proof of identity and address, anywhere in India.

Through UIDAI, Planning Commission encroached into turf of Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), which had mooted multipurpose National Identity Cards (MNICs) for citizens in the nineties.

MNICs were later renamed as Resident Identity (Smart) Cards (RICs) under the slow-moving National Population Register (NPR) managed by Office of Registrar General India (ORGI), a statutory authority under MHA.

A lot has been said and written about duplication of efforts by ORGI and UIDAI towards giving an identity to persons residing in the country. It is for the Government to order probe into waste of expenditure on duplication of such efforts in the Government. The least it can do is ask the Expenditure Management Commission (EMC) to take these UIDAI and NRAA as case studies of profligacy of tax payers' money by unaccountable powers that be.

The comprehensive Cabinet resolution on NITI is silent on UIDAI and NRAA. Would they be transferred respectively to MHA and Agriculture Ministry? Would these two authorities be retained under the Ministry of Planning, which is the other side of the same coin (Planning Commission)? Has the Planning Ministry been abolished or is it still in existence?

Official Information on all these issues is unavailable in the public domain. Even the updated Allocation of Business Rules (ABR) that defines the precise domain and mandate of different ministries is unavailable. The website of Cabinet Secretariat that host ABR flashes the message "under process" if the ABR link is clicked.

This is not smart governance. The failure to update and upload the latest information on the distribution of workload among different ministries shows lack of holistic approach.

In its keenness to demolish Planning Commission, the perceived symbol of the Centre's domineering attitude towards the States, Modi Government has not done its home work on issues that cannot be wished away.

One such subject is the concept of five-year plans and annual plans, which facilitate integrated development of the country. Associated with this is the concept of Centre giving additional financial assistance (plan and non-plan funds) to the States outside the domain of Finance Commission.

In the absence of clarity on these issues, we can presume that the domain of annual and five year planning would be retained at present through the two planning divisions of the Ministry of Finance - with one of them dealing with State plans and the other dealing with central projects that are channeled through Public Investment Board and Expenditure Finance Committee.

The Finance Ministry and Planning Commission often differed on the size of plans, resources mobilization and allocation of funds for different schemes and projects.

Keeping in view this fact, would it not be better to subsume the planning functions of the erstwhile Planning Commission into Finance Ministry.

It makes a sense to rename the Finance Ministry as Ministry of Finance and Planning by empowering it with the functions of Planning Commission and Planning Ministry (which presumably would cease to exist under the hoped-for amended ABR).

Yet another issue that requires clarification is whether NITI would serve as secretariat for National Development Council (NDC), a task that Planning Commission performed poorly. Or would moribund NDC become redundant as NITI would have all Chief Ministers as members of its governing council.

There are a few more issues that need to be sorted out. We hope Cabinet Secretariat is aware of all uncertainties resulting from replacement of Planning Commission.

We expect a comprehensive resolution of all such issues to ensure that planning and development process becomes more efficient under the new governance structure.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Good Governanace-less man power

It is under this 'Good Governance' phenomenon, a lot has to be done by the NDA government. The disbanding of Planning Commission is an initial step. Almost all the government departments are over-sized. A bold decision is to be taken either to revamp the departments depending upon their working conditions or out-source the activities for effective governance. The output from each department to be weighed with reference to the man-power requirement and in the process, the rotten eggs are to be eliminated to preserve the object of 'good governance'.

Posted by Venkata Ramana nageswara dutt
 

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023