News Update

Former Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveysST - Since Department itself admits that service carried out by appellant is that of 'Mining Services' w.e.f. 01.06.2007, thus demand for earlier period has been made only to fasten excess Service Tax demand on appellant which cannot sustain: CESTATICG rescues fisherman with head injury onboard IFB St. Francis off the Gujarat coastCX - When physical stock verification carried out by Officers was not fool proof and there were anomalies, benefit of doubt should be extended to assessee, duty demand confirmed on alleged clandestine removal is not sustainable: CESTAT
 
Cus - Decorated female figure with two hands and legs missing cannot be permitted to leave India as statue has historical value - Once a specialized committee has come to conclusion, Commissioner(A)'s view is not final - Stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 03, 2015: THE Department is before the CESTAT seeking a Stay of the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in respect of decorated female figure (idol) with two hands and legs missing (52.5x25x26cm) which has been held as non-antiquity.

The lower appellate authority passed this order on the basis of the minutes of the meeting held by ASI, New Delhi which came to conclusion that the product which is stated to be antiquity is not antiquity.

Incidentally, there is more to the idol story-

++ An expert committee had given its report that the idol was antiquity on the basis of treatment of ornaments, eyes, nose, rounded face and drapery and that this female image in red sandstone is assigned to 10th-11th century. In respect of other two statues, on the basis of scientific examination, it was concluded that the patination/colouration is easily removed and is not patination of age& that stylistically the objects are a non-antiquity.

++ Against this order of the expert committee holding the idol as an antique, an appeal was filed before the Director General, ASI, by the respondent (art dealing organization) who (DG, ASI) concurred with the finding of committee. So, the respondent approached the High Court and the Court directed the Director General, Archaeological Survey of India to re-examine the articles in question himself or to get it examined by a competent officer nominated by him.

++ Thereafter, a special team was reconstituted. The committee after detailed analysis allowed one of the statutes as non-antiquity. However, regarding decorated female figure with two hands and legs missing, they maintained that it is antiquity on the basis of treatment of ornaments, eyes, nose, rounded face and drapery &this female image in red sandstone is assigned to 10th-11th century. The Minutes of the Meeting on re-examination of the objects held on 30 - 31.07.2012 reads:

Sl.No.

Object

Material

Measurement

Decision taken

1.

Decorated Head

Stone

17.5x24x26cm

Non Antiquity, Scientific examination has concluded that patination/colouration is easily removed and is not patination of age. Stylistically the object is a non-antiquity.

2.

Decorated female figure with two hands and legs missing

Stone

52.5x25x18.5cm

Antiquity. On the basis of the treatment of ornaments, eyes, nose, rounded face and drapery this image in red sandstone is assigned to 10th - 11th century

After taking note of all these developments on record, the Bench held-

"9. Prima facie, I find that the argument made by Ld. Counsel is debatable in nature. Once a specialized committee have re-examined the matter and came to the conclusion, Commissioner (Appeals)'s view does not have finality in the matter. Considering the nature of the product has historical value, the product cannot be permitted to leave India till finalization of decision in the case. Accordingly, it is a fit case for grant of stay on the operation of Commissioner (Appeals)'s order."

The stay application filed by the department was allowed and the appeal was directed to be listed on priority basis.

(See 2015-TIOL-24-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.