News Update

Musk defers India’s trip citing heavy Tesla obligationsIndia needs to design legislative pills to euthanise tax-induced expatriation!I-T- Exercise of jurisdiction u/s 263 is invalid if AO has taken particular view, which though, may not be only view, but certainly can be possible view : ITATTorrential rains cause havoc in Pakistan; 87 killedI-T- Additions framed on account of unexplained money upheld as assessee was unable to prove source of cash deposited in assessee's bank account : ITATUS imposes sanctions on 3 Chinese firms and one from Belarus for transfering missile tech to PakistanCX - Appellant has regularly filed statutory returns on monthly basis and the fact of clearance of goods and availment of credit was duly reflected in returns but same has not been examined by authorities below, impugned order is not sustainable: CESTATDubai terribly water-logged as it has no storm drainsST - When services are received from separate source & accounted separately in separate ledgers, there cannot be any question of clubbing them under one category: CESTATEU online content rules tightened against adult content firmsCus - The continuous suspension of license of Customs Broker without either conducting an inquiry or issuing a notice for revocation of license or imposition of penalty is bad in law and needs to be set aside: CESTATEV market cools off in US; Ford, GM eyeing gas-powered trucksApple China tosses out WhatsApp & Threads from App store after being orderedChina announces launch of new military cyber corpsRailways operates record number of additional Trains in Summer Season 2024GST - Assessing officer took into account the evidence placed on record and drew conclusions - Bench is, therefore, of the view that petitioner should present a statutory appeal: HC1st phase polling - Close to 60% voter turnout recordedMinistry of Law to organise Conference on Criminal Justice System tomorrowGST - To effectively contest the demand and provide an opportunity to petitioner to place all relevant documents, matter remanded but by protecting revenue interest: HCGovt appoints New Directors for 6 IITsNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Israel launches missile attack on IranEC holds Video-Conference with over 250 Observers of Phase 2 polls
 
Permission for Prosecution of govt servants - Single Window System is in place: Minister

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI , DEC 18, 2014: SANCTION for Prosecution is accorded under Section 197 Cr.P.C. or Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, 1988, against public servants who can be of various ranks and from different service cadres i.e., State Services, Central Services, All India Services including officers of All India Services posted in the State cadres. Each service cadre has different competent authority in various State Governments and Central Departments/ Ministries for the said sanction depending on rank & service cadre of the official concerned and information on these matters is maintained by them.

The Department of Personnel & Training only handles such prosecution sanction cases under the PC Act, 1988, which are for Indian Administrative Service, Central Secretariat Service (Under Secretary & above level) & CBI (Group ‘A') officers, being the cadre controlling department of the above services.

The Central Vigilance Commission has provided a list of cases which are pending for accord of sanction under PC Act in the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions (as on 30.09.2014). There were five cases in which 14 requests for sanction of prosecution pending in the Department of Personnel & Training from the year 2012 onwards. All these requests are at various stages of submission.

The delay which occurs in the sanctioning of prosecution is mostly on account of detailed scrutiny and analysis of voluminous case records and evidence, consultation with Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), State Governments and other agencies, and sometimes on account of non-availability of relevant documentary evidence. Considering the delay, the Department of Personnel & Training vide its OM No.372/19/2012-AVD-III, dated 03.5.2012 has circulated certain recommendations, wherein the competent authority has been instructed to mandatorily take a decision within a period of three months from the receipt of request and pass a speaking order.

In pursuance of the above OM, pending cases are mentioned in the Committee headed by Secretary (Personnel). Prior to the issue of the aforesaid OM, the Department of Personnel & Training had issued guidelines vide its OM No.399/33/2006-AVD.III, dated 6th November, 2006 providing for definite time frame at each state for handling of requests from CBI for prosecution of public servants under the PC Act.

Department of Personnel & Training has also switched over to ‘Single Window System' with effect from 01.08.2014 for receiving prosecution sanction proposals in the Department as per the revised check-list in order to avoid delays due to protracted correspondence for want of requisite documents.

This was stated by the Minister of State for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Dr. Jitendra Singh in a written reply to Mr S.Rajendran and Shrimati Rama Devi in the Lok Sabha yesterday.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.