News Update

CLAT 2024 exams to be held on Dec 1NCGG commences Programme for officials of TanzaniaGST - Appellate Authority has not noticed the provisions of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 which mandates that the day on which the judgment complained of was pronounced, is also to be excluded: HCDefence Secretary commends BRO for playing major role in country's securityGST - If the Proper Officer was of the view that the reply filed was insufficient, he could have sought more clarification - Without providing any such opportunity, impugned order could not have been passed - Matter remanded: HCSC holds influencers, celebrities equally accountable for misleading adsGST - Notice requiring petitioner to furnish additional information/clarification does not mention that petitioner had to appear for personal hearing - Since no opportunity of personal hearing was given, order is unsustainable: HCIndian Naval ships arrive at Singapore; to head towards South China SeaGST - For the purposes of DNB and FNB courses, petitioner clearly falls within the scope of an educational institution imparting education to students enrolled with it as a part of a curriculum - Services exempted: HCIndia's MEDTECH industry holds immense potential: Dr Arunish ChawlaKejriwal’s judicial custody extended till May 20GST - Candidates appearing for the screening tests are not students of the petitioner - Petitioner's claim of exemption on such examination fees is unmerited: HCBrisk voting reported from all 96 LS seats; PM casts vote in AhmedabadGST - NEET examinations are in the nature of an entrance examination - Petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of an exemption by virtue of Serial No.66(aa) of the 2017 Notification, which came into effect on 25.01.2018: HCIndia calls back half of troops stationed at MaldivesIndia-Australia DTAA: Economic Statecraft through TaxRBI alerts against misuse of banking channels for facilitating illegal forex tradingTime Limit to file Appeal in GST Appellate TribunalEC censures Jagan Reddy & Chandrababu Naidu for MCC violationsFrance tells Xi Jinping EU needs protection from China’s cheap importsI-T- Addition cannot be made merely for reason that assessee got property transferred through registered sale without making payment to vendor: ITATI-T- Addition which is not based on the reasons for reopening is un-sustainable sans notice u/s 148 of the ACT: ITATOxygen valve malfunction delays launch of Boeing’s first crewed spacecraftFM administers Oath to Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra as first President of GST TribunalGhana agrees to activate UPI links in 6 monthsED seizes about 20 kg gold from locker of a cyber scammer in Haryana
 
ST - Delay in granting refund by Commissioner - Tribunal does not appreciate filing of ROM by Revenue but to meet ends of justice application listed for hearing on top of Board: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 08, 2014: IN the case of Vodafone (I) Ltd., the CESTAT had on 30.10.2014 [2014-TIOL-2263-CESTAT-MUM] observed -

ST - Commissioner is gaining time by citing one reason or the other and not sanctioning the refund- authorities to take expeditious steps to sanction the refund keeping in mind that interest is to be paid from the kitty of the general public - Order marked to Finance Minister for consideration: CESTAT

Fifteen days' time was granted to the Commissioner of Service Tax-III, Mumbai to dispose of the refund claim.

When the matter was posted on 17th November, 2014 to report compliance, the Special Counsel appointed by the Revenue informed the Bench that the Revenue had preferred miscellaneous application (filed on 11.11.2014) for rectification of mistake in the final order no. A/1381-1385/CSTB/C-I dt. 21.8.2014 [2014-TIOL-1794-CESTAT-MUM] passed by the Tribunal on the ground mainly that question of unjust enrichment has not been looked into by the Bench and the same needs to be gone into.

Evidently peeved by this submission, the Bench observed -

"4. This Tribunal does not appreciate the filing of ROM application at this stage, for meet the ends of justice, we direct the Registry that the ROM application filed on or before 11.11.2014 by the Revenue be listed on top of the Board before the appropriate Bench on 21.11.2014. Further, we direct the concerned Commissioner to file an undertaking before this Tribunal to the effect that in case the Revenue does not succeed in the ROM application, the refund shall be disposed within three working days from the date of disposal of the ROM. Such undertaking should be filed by Thursday on 20.11.2014. This order is being passed in the presence of Counsel for both the parties who have noted the contents of this order. Put up on 21.11.2014. No notice. No adjournment shall be allowed under any circumstances. Order be given Dasti."

In passing: What happened on 20.11.2014…we will let you know soon!

(See 2014-TIOL-2469-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.