News Update

IndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsFiling of Form 10A & 10AB: CBDT extends due date to June 30RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesCPGRAMS recognized as best practice in Commonwealth Secretaries of public serviceIsrael-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?KABIL, CSIR ink MoU for Advancing Geophysical InvestigationsI-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsRight to Sleep - A Legal lullaby
 
Taxation of Software, the impasse goes on...

NOVEMBER 22, 2014

By Lukose Joseph, CA & Anil P Nair, CA

THE principle of Value Added Tax (VAT) is that cascading taxes should be eliminated. A lot has been written about multiple taxation of Software Industry. The golden goose, unless the Government acts, may end up on the plates!

Recently a writ appeal (WA No 1125 of 2013 of High Court of Kerala) against Kerala High Court single bench decision in Kerala Classified Hotels and Restaurants Association - 2013-TIOL-533-HC-KERALA-ST was dismissed by Division bench and it was confirmed that service tax cannot be charged on food at Hotels as the same is purely a sale of goods.

Can the analogy be made applicable to the Software Industry?

Excise Duty

Central Excise Duty has to be charged on manufacture of information technology software. (Entry 8523 80 20 TARIFF - 12%)

Chapter Note of Chapter 85 of Central Excise Tariff says:

"For the purpose of heading 8523, ‘Information Technology Software’ means any representation of instructions, data, sound or image, including source code and object code, recorded in a machine readable form, and capable of being manipulated or providing interactivity to a user, by means of an automatic data processing machine."

Thus Central Excise Duty will have to be paid on transfer of Software.

Goods that are subject to VAT

In 2005, however, the Supreme Court had held that the transfer of branded software constitutes a sale and is subject to sales tax levied by state governments under Entry 54, Schedule VII of the Constitution of India (Tata Consultancy Services v State of AP - 2004-TIOL-87-SC-CT-LB)

"The test to determine whether a property is goods for the purpose of sales tax is not whether the property is tangible or incorporeal. The test is whether the concerned item is capable of abstraction, consumption, and use, and whether it can be transmitted, transferred, delivered, possessed etc. If the software, whether customized or banded, satisfies all these attributes, it would be goods".

The same was the view in Infosys Technology Ltd v CCT - 2008-TIOL-509-HC-MAD-CT where Madras High Court held that both customized and non-customized software are goods subject to sales tax.

Also a Service!

Section 66E Clause (d) of the Finance Act, 1994 specifies software service as a declared service. It reads:

"Development, design, programming, customization, adaptation, up-gradation, enhancement, implementation of information technology software"

The term Information technology software is defined in Section 65B (28) as follows:

"information technology software" means any representation of instructions, data, sound or image, including source code and object code, recorded in a machine readable form, and capable of being manipulated or providing interactivity to a user, by means of a computer or an automatic data processing machine or any other device or equipment;"

Read the above with CBEC education guideline Para 6.4.4 and we are clear that Service tax is applicable on software.

The consolation is that Excise Duty and Service tax being under Central Government, only either will be applied. However VAT, at least till we welcome Goods and Services Tax (GST) is a subject matter for States as per the Constitution and hence the tug of war.

If Software is service, then how is VAT applicable on the same?

In the case of Infotech Software Dealers Association v. Union of India - 2010-TIOL-620-HC-MAD-ST, it was held that the software is ‘goods’ and whether the transaction would amount to a sale or a service would depend upon the individual transaction and for the reason of that challenge, the amended provision cannot be held to be unconstitutional so long as the Parliament has the legislative competency to enact law in respect of tax on service in exercise of its powers under Entry 97 of List of I of Schedule VII.

The terms and conditions of End User License Agreement (EULA) are material as far as finding an element of sale in a transaction of software sales. Though it was observed that when software is sold through medium of internet in downloadable format with password and not CD, the requirement of being goods is not satisfied, the law is not static and technological advancement can be considered in interpretations and hence they are necessarily ‘sale of goods’.

Hence by virtue of the above decision, VAT is also applicable.

The current trade/industry practice is to pay both Service Tax and VAT to avoid litigation with the departments on an issue on which a final decision is awaited.

In the case of Imagic Creative (P) Ltd v CCT & Ors - 2008-TIOL-04-SC-VAT, the Supreme Court held that a transaction (here, service for evolution of prototype conceptual design) can either amount to a ‘sale of goods’ or ‘service’ for the purpose of taxation. Thus, charging both 100% is against the judicial principles of mutual exclusiveness.

In the case of Works Contract, both Service Tax and VAT are applicable, but Service Tax law allows deduction for value of goods and VAT law allows deduction for service. Clause (c) of explanation to Valuation Rule 2A provides that where VAT has been paid on the actual value of transfer of property in goods involved under the state law, the said value adopted for the purpose of payment of value added tax shall be taken as value of transfer of property in goods.

Why the software industry is not considered similarly? What is the logic in concluding that software is 100% goods and 100% service? The judicial principles of mutual exclusiveness as pronounced in the case of Imagic Creative (P) Ltd should be followed.

Adding salt to wound, under section 194 J of the Income Tax Act, tax deducted at source (TDS) is @ 10% being a notified profession.

Software industry is burdened with taxes. Isn’t it time the Government considered more scientific methods to collect taxes from this goose now laying golden eggs? Should we kill it?

(DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the sites)

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Double taxation

The learned authors have raised a very valid point.

Another issue the state governments should consider is the cascading effect of taxes.
State Governments have worded the definition of Turnover and Sale Price very broadly in the respective state vat acts.
Thus, there are conflicting views that service tax would also form part of the sale price and would be exigible to VAT.


Posted by Unnikrishnan Mohan
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.