News Update

Israel shuts down Al Jazeera; seizes broadcast equipmentIndia to wait for Canadian Police inputs on arrest of men accused of killing Sikh separatist: JaishankarLabour Party candidate Sadiq Khan wins record third term as London MayorArmy convoy ambushed in Poonch sectorDeadly floods evict 70K Brazilians out of homes; 57 killed so farGovt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha Elections7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implication
 
CENVAT - Inputs written off as obsolete - Rule 3(5B) of CCR, 2004 does not have retrospective effect - Reversal of credit not called for - Revenue's appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, NOV 12, 2014: ON scrutiny of the respondent's trial balance sheet for the year 2003-04, it was found that as on 31.3.2004, there were certain obsolete inputs, WIP worth Rs.1,22,20,110/- against which provision of Rs.73,33,865/- was made in the accounts by reducing the value.

The jurisdictional R/S, in November, 2007 enquired with the assessee the status of the said goods. Pursuant thereto, the assessee reversed CENVAT credit of Rs.23.90 lakhs. Not convinced with this reversal on the ground that the assessee had not submitted one-to-one co-relation of the inputs, a SCN was issued demanding duty of Rs.19.94 lakhs by invoking the extended period of limitation.

Whereas the adjudicating authority confirmed the demand, the Commissioner (A) set aside the same on the ground of limitation.

So, the Revenue is before the CESTAT.

The main ground in the appeal is that in terms of Rule 3(5B) of the CCR, 2004 introduced by Notification No. 26/2007-CE(NT) dated 11.5.2007, the respondent is required to pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit taken on the said inputs. Support is also taken of Board Circular No. 645/36/2002-CX dated 16.7.2002. In the matter of limitation, it is submitted that since the respondent had not informed the department till date the whereabouts of inputs, inputs in WIP which have been written off as obsolete in the books of account in the year 2003-04, the extended period is rightly invoked.

The respondent assessee submitted that none of the items have been taken away or clandestinely removed by the respondent; it is only for the accounting purposes that they have reduced the value of the goods and this is in accordance with the requirement of accounting practices as also the income-tax law.; many a times the goods on which reduced value is taken are put to use in the subsequent period and the finished products so produced are cleared on payment of duty; that Rule 3(5B) has been introduced only w.e.f. 11.5.2007 and that also only in respect of the goods where the value is fully written off; rule was further amended vide Notification No. 3/2011-CE(NT) dated 1.3.2011 so as to include the cases which are partially written off; their case is covered by the amendment of 2011; the period involved is prior to 2003-04 and, therefore, the amended rule cannot be applied. It is also submitted that in 2007 when the issue was brought up and the rule was amended, though for fully written off cases, they decided to reverse the credit as on 1.4.2007; that these figures would include even the figures of trial balance sheet of 2003-04 on which the demand has been raised; that practically it is not possible for one-to-one correlation of each item and what has happened to the said item. Following case laws were inter alia cited in support viz. Hindalco Industries Ltd. 2011-TIOL-970-HC-MUM-CX, Ingersoll Rand (India) Ltd. 2012-TIOL-1107-HC-AHM-CX, Philips Electronics India Ltd. - 2010-TIOL-994-CESTAT-MUM, Sakata Inx (India) Ltd. - 2008-TIOL-2422-CESTAT-DEL, ADC India Communications Ltd. - 2012-TIOL-1291-CESTAT-BANG. In the matter of limitation since there was no removal or suppression of facts, extended period cannot be invoked.

The Bench extracted the findings of the Commissioner (A) and observed that the issue on merits is already settled in favour of the respondent inasmuch as the High Courts have taken the view that the said provisions are applicable only from the date of introduction.

Noting that the issue on merits is already settled in favour of the respondents in the case of Hindalco Industries Ltd. & Ingersoll Rand and the High Courts have taken the view that the provisions of Rule 3(5B) of CCR, 2004 are applicable only from the date of introduction& the demand in the case on hand is for the period prior to the date of introduction and also that the Revenue has not been able to elaborate what is the misrepresentation or misstatement done by the respondent so as to allege suppression of facts with intention to evade duty, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.

(See 2014-TIOL-2244-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.