News Update

Indian Coast Guard on prowl; seizes 173 kg drugs from Indian fishing boat; 2 arrestedCus - High Courts are barred from hearing appeals involving issues of valuation of imported goods; appeals dismissed as not maintainable: HCIBC - When one party owes debt to another and creditor is claiming under written agreement providing for rendering 'service', debt is operational debt if claim of debt has some connection with service : SC (See 'TIOLCorplaws')SC stays HC order directing CBI to probe against WB officials’ role in teachers’ recruitment scamICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 crore9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to FranceConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killed
 
CX - Goods procured under Notification No 22/2003 and 52/2003-Cus by EOUs and cleared in DTA - Whether benefit of exemption under Notification No 6/2006 is admissible - Matter referred to Larger Bench in view of conflicting decisions: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

 

AHMEDABAD, SEPT 26, 2014: THE appellant being an EOU, had imported and procured locally inputs for manufacturing of goods for export, by availing benefit of Notification No. 22/2003-CE and 52/2003-Cus. There is a proviso in the said notifications, which requires an assessee to discharge or return back the amounts of customs duty forgone by the department if the goods are cleared in DTA, without payment of duty. In the cases in hand, the appellant has availed benefit of exemption Notification No. 06/2006-CE.

The appellant has placed reliance on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. Synergies-Dooray Automative Limited & Ors 2008-TIOL-682-CESTAT-BANG, wherein the very same notifications were interpreted and it was held that no duty can be demanded on the imported inputs, if there is DTA clearance claiming exemption. Revenue relied on another judgment in the case of Indira Printers - 2010-TIOL-1908-CESTAT-DEL, wherein diagonally opposite view has been taken by the Tribunal.

On going through both the judgements, the Tribunal opined that on the same issue, two different views are expressed by the benches of the Tribunal, therefore the matter needs to be referred to the President to consider whether a Larger Bench needs to be constituted to resolve the issue.

Since the issue needs to be resolved by a Larger Bench, the Tribunal granted complete waiver of pre deposit.

(See 2014-TIOL-1850-CESTAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.