News Update

IndiGo orders 30 Airbus A350s for long haulsFiling of Form 10A & 10AB: CBDT extends due date to June 30RBI to issue fresh guidelines for banks to freeze suspected bank accounts being used for cyber crimesCPGRAMS recognized as best practice in Commonwealth Secretaries of public serviceIsrael-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?KABIL, CSIR ink MoU for Advancing Geophysical InvestigationsI-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsRight to Sleep - A Legal lullaby
 
ST - Bench had asked Revenue to verify as to whether surety bond has been executed as per Apex Court order - in response, CCE, Pune III submitted letter wherein confirmation sought is not forthcoming but many other useless information is reproduced - Matter adjourned: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 20, 2014: THE service in question is ‘Renting of Immovable Property Service'.

Against the appellant, a Service Tax demand of Rs.4.37 lakhs was confirmed by the adjudicating authority and the amount of Rs.2.42 lakhs paid was appropriated along with interest of Rs.144/-. As the Commissioner (A) upheld the order, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that the tenant of the appellant is a party challenging the service tax levy of ‘Renting of Immovable Property' in Retailer Association of India and in terms of the Supreme Court order - 2011-TIOL-104-SC-ST, the tenant has executed surety bond for the 50% of the service tax demand confirmed and, therefore, stay be granted. A copy of the said surety bond was also placed on record by the appellant.

The Bench observed -

"During the previous proceeding on 22.07.2014, the revenue was asked to verify whether the surety bond as per Hon'ble Apex Court order has been complied with or not. In response thereof, a letter dated 13.08.2014 has been submitted signed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune III wherein the confirmation sought for by the Bench is not forthcoming and so many other useless information is reproduced. On perusal of the surety bond executed, it is seen that it is not in the surety bond format which has to be accepted in favour of the President of the India through the jurisdictional Asst. Commissioner. The bond has to be signed in the presence of the competent authority who has to accept the same. Inasmuch as it has not been done, we direct the appellant to inform the tenant to execute the bond in the proper format before the competent authority who shall accept the same, after considering the credit worthiness of the surety."

The appellant sought four weeks' time to complete the formality and, therefore, the stay petitions were directed to be listed on 30.09.2014 for completion of the surety bond formality.

The matter was adjourned to 30.09.2014.

(See 2014-TIOL-1802-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.