News Update

CBIC revises tariff value of edible oils, gold & silverFormer IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt jailed for 20 yrs for planting drugs to frame lawyerCentre receives Rs 18.5 lakh crore tax revenue upto Feb monthUN says Households waste across world is now at least one billion meals a dayExpert Committee on developing GIFT IFSC as 'Global Finance and Accounting Hub' submits report to IFSCAIndia, China hold fresh dialogue for complete disengagement on Western borders: MEADefence Production issues notification for re-organisation of DGQAThakur says India is prepared for 2036 OlympicsCBDT substitutes Form in ITR-5EV Revolution: Lessons for India to learn from US and China!London court green-signals auction of luxury apartment of fugitive Nirav ModiGovt consults RBI; finalises borrowing plan for first half of FY 2024-25Gadkari says Farmers’ protest is politically-motivatedVP calls upon women entrepreneurs to be 'Vocal for Local'America offers USD 10 mn bounty for information on ‘Blackcat’ hackers after UnitedHealth gets hitI-T- The order of the ITSC can only be reopened in cases of fraud or misrepresentation: HC8 persons including Hezbollah militants killed in Israeli strike on LebanonMacron pillories EU-South Africa trade deal; calls it ‘really bad’ in BrazilThailand’s Lower House okays Bill to legitimise same-sex marriageYellen warns China against clean energy dumpingMilky Way’s central black hole - Twisted magnetic field observedCus - Assessee has not proved beyond reasonable doubt that goods in question imported under air way bills/bills of entry were in fact filed by him and hence the only natural corollary available to Revenue is confiscation of same: CESTATSmall investors help Trump Media’s valuation skyrocket to USD 13 billionJustice Ritu Raj Awasthi joins as Judicial member of Lokpal
 
Retrospective Amendment of 2012 - CBDT Constitutes High Level Committee

DDT in Limca Book of Records - Third Time in a rowTIOL-DDT 2426
29.08.2014

Friday

IN his Budget speech, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had said,

This Government will not ordinarily bring about any change retrospectively which creates a fresh liability. Hon'ble Members are aware that consequent upon certain retrospective amendments to the Income Tax Act 1961 undertaken through the Finance Act 2012, a few cases have come up in various courts and other legal fora. These cases are at different stages of pendency and will naturally reach their logical conclusion. At this juncture I would like to convey to this August House and also the investors community at large that we are committed to provide a stable and predictable taxation regime that would be investor friendly and spur growth. Keeping this in mind, we have decided that henceforth, all fresh cases arising out of the retrospective amendments of 2012 in respect of indirect transfers and coming to the notice of the Assessing Officers will be scrutinized by a High Level Committee to be constituted by the CBDT before any action is initiated in such cases.

Accordingly, the CBDT has yesterday constituted a High Level Committee with (i) Joint Secretary (FT&TR-I) (ii) Joint Secretary (TPL-I) (iii) Commissioner of Income-tax (ITA).

Where any Assessing officer considers that any income is deemed to accrue or arise in India before 1st April, 2012 through transfer of a capital asset situate in India in consequence of the amendments introduced with retrospective effect, and as on the date of this order,-

(i) no proceeding of assessment or reassessment in relation to the said income is pending; or

(ii) no notice for proposed assessment or re-assessment in relation to the said income has been issued; or (iii) no proceeding under section 201 of the Act is pending, or no notice for initiation of such proceeding has been issued in relation to the said income,

then, before proceeding with any action in relation to the said income, the Assessing Officer shall seek prior approval of the Committee for the proposed action by making a reference to the Committee through the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner concerned. The Assessing Officer shall forward a copy of the reference to the assessee.

The Committee, on receipt of the reference from the Assessing Officer, shall examine the proposed action of the Assessing Officer and, after providing an opportunity to the assessee, take a decision on the proposed action. The committee shall convey its decision in writing to the Assessing Officer with copy to the Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner concerned and the assessee. The Committee shall endeavour to decide the reference within 60 days of its receipt by the Secretary of the Committee. However, the Committee shall have due regard to any limitation period involved in the proposed action.

The Assessing Officer shall thereafter proceed in accordance with the directions of the Committee.

CBDT Order under Section 119 in F.No. 149/141/2014-TPL, Dated: August 28, 2014

Constitution of Review Committee of Chief Commissioners/Commissioners - CBEC Orders

BY Office Order No. 220/2012 dated 23.11.2012, the Board had issued a pre-approved chain of nomination of first link officer and second link officer at the level of Chief Commissioners.

This was to ensure that in the event of an officer at the level of Chief Commissioner / Directors General and Commissioners in the CBEC proceeding on leave/absence, CBEC has approved a chain of nomination (Link Officer):

For example, if the Delhi Central Excise Chief Commissioner goes on leave, the post will be held by the Delhi Customs Chief Commissioner as the first link officer and if he is not available, the Chief Commissioner, Jaipur as the second link officer. Similarly if the DGRI goes on leave, the post will be held by DGCEI or DG(vig). (Please see DDT 1991 27.11.2012)

Now the Board wants to use this link officer mechanism for the Committee of Chief Commissioners reviewing the order of Commissioners in Customs, Excise and Service Tax.

The Board Order states, "with the approval of the Competent Authority, it is hereby ordered that the first nominated link officer would function as the member of the committee for the purpose of review of Orders-in-Original passed by Commissioners in the case wherein a Chief Commissioner, who is a member of the Review Committee proceeds on leave, transfer or is absent for any other reason. Where the first nominated link officer happens to be a member of the Review Committee constituted by the Board, the second nominated link officer would function as the member of the Review Committee."

The Order further stipulates, "Henceforth, only such cases need to be referred to the Board for nomination of a Chief Commissioner as member of the Committee where, for any reason, the Review Committee cannot be constituted by the first nominated link officer and the second nominated link officer. Similarly, for the purpose of constitution of Review Committee of Commissioners, only such cases need to be referred to the Board where the Chief Commissioner is not able to assign the charge to another Commissioner within his Zone or the Commissioner being assigned the administrative charge of the Commissionerate falling vacant also happens to be member of the Committee."

Who is this mysterious Competent Authority who springs up in such Government Orders like the Coal Scam? Why can't they specify as to who the Competent Authority is?

CBEC OFFICE ORDER - 1/2014 in F.No.390/Review/ 49 /2014-JC, Dated: August 28, 2014

Safeguard Duty imposed on Saturated Fatty Alcohols

THE Government has imposed a provisional safeguard duty of twenty per cent on "Saturated Fatty Alcohols with carbon chain length of C8,C10,C12,C14,C16, and C18 including single, blends and unblended (not including branched isomers) which includes blends of a combination of carbon chain lengths, C12-C14, C12-C16, C12-C18,C16-18 and C14-C16 (commonly categorized as C12-C14)"falling under sub-heading 2905 17 or 3823 70 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act.

DDT had reported in DDT 2299 21.02.2014 - India initiates Safeguards Investigations on Saturated Fatty Alcohols


Notification No. 03/2014-Customs(SG), Dated: August 28, 2014

There is no specific target to be achieved - undue haste is not at all called for

IN a scathing indictment of the manner in which orders were being passed by the CESTAT, WZB, the High Court has come down heavily in a recent decision which we are reporting today.

Terming the order as cryptic and which had left the High Court with no alternative but to pass a ‘wholesale order of remand', the order was quashed and set aside and the appeal was restored to the file of the Tribunal for a decision afresh.

Incidentally, such discourse was also made in the case of Zenith Computers Ltd. 2014-TIOL-623-HC-MUM-ST.Please also see DDT 2345.

See Breaking News.

Abhishek Verma Nominated for Arjuna Award-2014 for Archery

IT is informed that Abhishek Verma, has been nominated for Arjuna Award-2014 for his outstanding achievement in Archery. Abhishek Verma has been an excellent sportsman and has got 1st National Ranking, 2nd Asian Ranking and 19th World Ranking during 2013-14 as Compound Archer. Abhishek Verma is representing India at Asian Games 2014.

Abhishek is a Tax Assistant with the Income Tax Department,at present posted with CIT, Delhi-XIV. An Arjuna Awardee working as a tax assistant? Well, that is the highest post the Revenue Department gives its most outstanding sportsmen, whileself-professed sportsmen who joined the department long ago are now Assistant Commissioners!

A Commissioner told me an incident. A National level sportsman had approached the Commissioner for his help for a job as Tax Assistant. The Commissioner's daughter who was dreaming to become a sportsperson told her father, "if after all the efforts, the highest job I can get in your department is that of a tax assistant, I would rather leave the sports field and get into the IRS"

The Office of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi has circulated the happy news to all Income Tax Officers in Delhi Region. The Circular is signed by a DC.

Also see India's top cricket umpire is a Central Excise officer

F. No. P-324/4/General Circulars/2014-15/6315 of the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Cadre Controlling Authority) New Delhi,Dated: August 28, 2014

DDT Cartoon


Jurisprudentiol - Monday's cases

Legal Corner IconService Tax

s.85 of FA, 1994 - General Clauses Act defines month as British Calendar month and it is not defined in terms of number of days - condonation period of one month allowed to Commissioner(A) should not be interpreted as number of days: CESTAT

A Service Tax demand of Rs.4,85,174/- was confirmed against the appellant and their appeal was dismissed as time-barred by the Commissioner (A) on the ground that the appeal was filed on 17/02/2014 in respect of an adjudication order received on 18/11/2013 and, therefore, the appeal has been filed after the expiry of 91 days from the date of communication of the order.

Income Tax

Whether when company's name and products are being advertised or financial results being published, there is any rationale for segregating such expenditure Unit-wise - NO: ITAT

THE assessee concern has raised a ground with regard to the allocation of certain expenses to the assessee's Dehradun Unit, exigible to deduction u/.80-IC, viz. advertisement expenses, legal and professional expenses, audit expenses. It was in the business of manufacture of rectifiers, transformers, devices, thyristors, etc. for telecommunication, railways and defence departments, operating through different units, of which only the Dehradun unit was an eligible undertaking u/s.80-IC. It had claimed a meagre allocation to the Dehradun unit, so that the bulk of the expenditure under the said heads of account stood allocated to non-80-IC units, purportedly on the basis of actual, AO did not found the same acceptable in the absence of proper substantiation of its claims by the assessee and, accordingly, allocated the same on the basis of the turnover of the different units.

The issue before the Bench is - Whether when company's name and products are being advertised or financial results being published, there is any rationale for segregating such expenditure Unit-wise. And the answer is NO.

CENTRAL EXCISE

CX - Purchasing 98% concentrated sulphuric acid and diluting the same with de-mineralised water as per customer requirement to get diluted sulphuric acid, which is marketable and used by battery manufacturing units is a process amounting to manufacture u/s 2(f) of CEA, 1944: CESTAT

THE appellant is engaged in the activity of dilution of sulphuric acid and the finished product is supplied to the battery companies for use in the batteries. The contention of the appellant is that the said activity is not a manufacturing activity as they only mixed two chemicals.

See our Columns Monday for the judgements

Until Monday with more DDT

Have a nice weekend.

Legal Corner Icon
Happy Ganesh Chaturthi

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

AR not Afar by SK Rahman

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri Shailendra Kumar, Trustee, TIOL Trust, giving welcome speech at TIOL Awards 2023




Shri M C Joshi, Former Chairman, CBDT




Address by Shri Buggana Rajendranath, Hon'ble Finance Minister of Andhra Pradesh at TIOL Awards 2023