News Update

Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile successfully flight-tested by DRDO off the Odisha coastUS imposes fresh sanctions against Iranian drone productionIREDA's GIFT City office to boost Green Hydrogen and Renewable Energy Manufacturing ProjectsVoting for General Elections 2024 commences tomorrowGlobal warming up to 3 degrees to cost 10% of global GDP: StudyNexus between Election Manifesto and Budget 2024 in July!Clearing the Air: Airtel's SC Decision provides clarity on test of AgencyGST implications for Corporate Debtor under IBCI-T- Petitioner's CIBIL score lowered due to same PAN being issued to another assessee who defaulted on loan; I-T Deptt to inform CIBIL of remedial measures taken: HCBrazil’s proposal to tax super-rich globally finds many takers in G20 GroupI-T- Additions framed on account of unconfirmed cash loans upheld in part, where assessee is unable to discharge onus of proving source of cash deposits : ITATCPM manifesto promising annihilation of all weapons of mass destructions including nuclear, draws flak from Defence MinisterI-T- Registration of trust u/s 12A denied due to inadvertent error by assessee in filing Form 10AB but with wrong selection code; case remanded for reconsideration: ITATBiden favours higher steel tariff on ‘cheating’ China + may up tariff on dominant solar tech suppliersI-T- Enhancement of income is not sustainable if CIT (A) not follow sec 251 and no notice given to assessee of enhancement : ITATUS Poll: Biden trumps Trump in money race by USD 75 mnI-T- Assessee is entitled for depreciation on goodwill arising out of difference between cost of acquisition and net value of assets and liabilities as per book value of CAPL : ITATNetanyahu says Israel to decide how and when to respond to Iran’s aggressionI-T- There is no scope of extrapolation in search assessment based solely on assumptions and surmises in absence of any tangible material qua the relevant assessment year: ITATGoogle slays costs by laying off staffers & shifting roles outside USI-T- Re-assessment cannot be sustained where based on borrowed satisfaction & where conducted in a mechanical manner: ITATHeavy downpours drown Dubai; Airport issues travel advisoryCus - There cannot be an exercise of jurisdiction to injunct invocation of BG, as it is a settled principle of law that bank guarantee constitutes an independent contract between the bank and the party in whose favour BG is furnished: HCHM pledges to make India completely Maoist-freeGST - Except for holding that the taxpayer had availed ITC which is blocked credit u/s 17(5), no reasons are specified - Order set aside and matter remanded: HCMicrosoft to inject USD 1.5 bn in AI Group G42 of UAEGST - Injustice would be caused unless petitioner is provided another opportunity to contest tax demand on merits - Subject to deposit of 10% of demand, matter is remanded: HCCanadian budget proposes more taxes on higher income groups & tax credits for EVsWorld leaders appeal for quick ratification of UN Ocean Treaty
 
ST - Appellant providing services to Knowledge Corporation which provides IT Literacy Course to make learner IT literate - BAS services are exempt since they come within clause (d) of exemption Notification 14/2004: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, AUG 22, 2014: THE appellant is engaged in providing services to M/s Maharashtra Knowledge Corporation Ltd. (MKCL) in relation to -

a) Promotion or marketing of services provided by MKCL;

b) Services incidental or auxiliary to the activity of promotion or marketing such as evaluation or development of prospective customer or vendor, public relation services, management or supervision on service activity;

c) Sale of services of MKCL.

MKCL is providing Information Technology Literacy Course MS-CIT to make learner IT literate. These courses comprise of:-

++ Reading and understanding a highly illustrated book

++  E-learning based self-learning sessions

++ MKCL's E-learning revolution for All (ERA)

++ Providing hands-on practice sessions

++ Learning facilitation by certified professionals

++ Academic interactions, assessment and collaboration.

After investigation, a show cause notice was issued to the applicants demanding ST for services provided by them to MKCL under the category of Business Auxiliary Service.

While granting Stay, the CESTAT had observed -

"3. We have gone through the services rendered by the applicant to MKCL and the activity of MKCL. Prima facie the activity of MKCL is not in the nature of business. Therefore, the service rendered by the applicants prima facie does not fall under Business Auxiliary Service."

We reported the Stay order two years back as 2012-TIOL-1088-CESTAT-MUM.

Along with the demands involved in the aforesaid stay order, another demand had also joined the bandwagon by the time the appeals were heard, recently.

The total service tax demand thus involved was Rs.32,20,600/- for the period April 2005 to March 2012 along with penalties &interest.

The appellant after explaining the activities conducted by them submitted that the same are incidental or ancillary to the promotion of IT education in Maharashtra and, therefore, is exempt under Notification 14/2004-ST dated 10/09/2004 which provides exemption of 'business auxiliary services' in so far it relates to:-

(a) Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs for the client;

(b) Production of goods on behalf of the client;

(c) Provision of services on behalf of the client; or

(d) A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c) above.

It is the contention of the appellant that the activity undertaken by them falls within clause (c) viz. provision of service on behalf of the client or alternatively it would fall under clause (d) viz. a service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in (a) to (c).

The Revenue representative submitted that the activity undertaken is promotion of business of MKCL which is also evident from the contracts entered into and, therefore, the appellant is not eligible for the benefit of Notification 14/2004-ST as rightly held by the lower authorities.

The Bench observed:

++ Activities undertaken by the appellant would certainly come within clause (d) of the exemption Notification 14/2004-ST which is “a service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in clauses (a) to (c)” and clause (c) deals with provision of service on behalf of client.

++ It is a settled position in law, as explained in the case of Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilisers Ltd. 2002-TIOL-234-SC-CX that there are two stages of interpreting an exemption Notification. In the first stage, whether the appellant falls within the exemption clause, strict interpretation is required to be made. Once the appellant falls within the scope of exemption, a liberal construction has to be adopted.

++ As the activity undertaken by the appellant is incidental or ancillary to the provision of service by the client, the appellant falls within the exemption; therefore a liberal interpretation has to be given and the various activities undertaken by the appellant would become eligible for the benefit of the exemption.

Holding that there is no merit in the orders of the lower authorities, the same were set aside and the appeals were allowed.

(See 2014-TIOL-1564-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.




Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.