Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Friday , May 22, 2015 | Updated : May 22, 18:01 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Law Commission submits Report on Guardianship and Custody Laws (See 'Mixed Buzz') Govt appoints G Mohan Kumar of 1979 Batch IAS as Secretary, Defence Production Govt lays down procedure for implementation of Track & Trace System (See PN 13 in ‘What’s New’) Telangana Govt looking for Special Commissioner, e-Governance + Addl Commissioner, VAT on deputation basis + ED invites applications for post of Addl Director (See ‘Deputation’ in Pitara) Govt sure of land bill passage in next session I-T - Whether where 'interest earned' does not have any direct nexus with 'income from business of export', such interest cannot be deducted as income from export u/s 80HHC(3)(a) - YES: HC Full Bench (See 'Breaking News') National Litigation Policy - CBEC Sermons (See 'DDT') ST - providing of 'gear boys' and 'deck foremen' by association of stevedores to its members - Prima facie covered by High Court decisions - Stay petition allowed unconditionally (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - Draft scheme of the proposed rules for computation of Arm's Length Price (See 'DDT') Income tax - Whether sum received after tripartite agreement is to be taxed as capital gains when assessee is engaged in such activity with respect to only one property - YES: HC (See 'Breaking News') Cabinet approves revival plan for Sindri Fertiliser unit (See 'Mixed Buzz') VAT - Whether a decision on debatable point of law or failure to apply law to a set of facts which remain to be investigated, can be corrected by way of rectifications - NO: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1310') Story of Income Tax Welfare Fund (See 'DDT') CBEC notifies New Customs Exchange rates effective from 22nd may (See 'What's New') National Litigation Policy: CBEC issues fresh direction to improve indirect tax administration Trial for emergency landing on NHs: IAF mirage successfully lands on Yamuna Expressways PM pays tribute to former PM Rajiv Gandhi on his death anniversary IAF fighter aircraft Mirage -2000 Lands at Yamuna Expressway Credit Flow in GST Regime - And the Discredit goes to ... (See 'The Cob (Web)' Column) ST - CENVAT - Third party MV insurance - As per Rule 9, whatever ST has been paid, applicant is entitled to take credit - Question whether applicant has availed credit of input service without receiving service shall be dealt with at time of final hearing - Stay granted: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') CAG says Customs and Central Excise Welfare Fund is not necessary - Huge Mess in CBEC fund spending (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether insertion of expression 'even if delay in disposing of appeal is not attributable to assessee' by virtue of Finance Act, 2008, is violative of non-discrimination clause of Article 14 - YES: HC (See 'Breaking News') CBEC New Members + Principal Commissioners' files moving at good pace DIPP - Major Initiatives on Improving ‘Ease of Doing Business’ in India (See 'DDT') CENVAT - ISD neither provides any service nor pays any ST and, therefore, there is no question of assessment - Contention that credit cannot be denied unless assessment of distribution of credit made at ISD is rejected outright: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') 'Invisible Hand' should work to advantage of society: Narayana Murthy (See 'Mixed Buzz') VAT - Whether agreement between assessee and transporter giving on hire two Deluxe buses for being plied as per requirement of the latter is liable to VAT: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1300')
 
Bookmark and Share
Service tax on job work : Still in a mess!

By Santosh Hatwar

BUSINESS Auxiliary service was in the news recently thanks to the ingenuity of certain field officers’ over enthusiasm in netting small time job workers in the Gems and jewellery sector into the service tax fold. This prompted the Board to issue a circular No. 341/13/2005 TRU dated 12.05.2005 on the subject of levy of service tax on certain processes under taken on job work basis in gems and jewellery sector. The changes brought in by the Finance Bill 2005 (now Finance Act 2005) in the definition of Business Auxiliary service was also mentioned and finally it was stated that those processes which are outsourced in gem and jewellery sector which amount to manufacture within the scope of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not be liable for service tax. Production of goods on behalf of the client is leviable to service tax only if such production activity does not amount to manufacture. Is there anything new in the clarification? Does it clarify anything at all in the first place except for restating what is available in the statute? Let us delve into the provisions related to this levy that has been the subject of one controversy or the other since its inception.

The scope of Business auxiliary service for the purpose of levy of service tax was extended with effect from 10.09.2004 to include “production of goods on behalf of the client” by amending clause (19) of Section 65 of the Finance Act 1994. This clause was further amended by Section 88 of the finance bill 2005 by substituting the existing clause with a new clause viz., “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client”. Further vide Notification No. 8/05 ST dated 01.03.05, “production on behalf of the client” is exempted from service tax if these job worked goods are produced from the raw materials or semi finished goods supplied by the client and these are returned back to their clients for use in or in relation to the manufacture of final products on which excise duty is payable. This concept of “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” is commonly referred to as job work in trade parlance.

As per the explanations to this Notification the production of goods undertaken should not amount to manufacture in terms of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and duty payable goods does not include goods which are wholly exempt from duty or nil duty goods. For the purpose of this Notification the words production and processing are used interchangeably though they do not mean the same. The Web definition of production in economics is manufacturing or mining or growing something (usually in large quantities) for sale; e.g., "he introduced more efficient methods of production”. Similarly processing is defined as preparing or putting through a prescribed procedure for e.g., "the processing of ore to obtain minerals". In Webster’s college dictionary production means, “ the act of producing; creating or manufacture” and processing means “ a systematic series of actions directed to some end”; “ a continuous action, operation, or series of changes taking place in a defined manner”.

If we look at these definitions in the backdrop of excise and service tax laws it is clear that production and manufacture mean one and the same and therefore can be used interchangeably which is normally the case. But when it comes to processing, it may or may not amount to production or manufacture depending on the nature of processes involved in the act. However, the explanation (i) to the Notification states that this production should not amount to manufacture thereby resolving to certain extent that production is not always manufacture in service tax. So far so good, but what is the fate of “processing”? The service tax levy is on “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” and the exemption is given only to “production on behalf of client”.

As is normally understood the activity of “production of goods on behalf of the client” is the practice followed in the pharmaceutical industry i.e., manufacture on loan licensee basis, jewellery industry, textiles and a host of other sectors of industry that are either process intensive or labour intensive. In all these cases normally the job worker is treated as manufacturer and excise dues are discharged by the job worker only. As the Notification speaks of exempting only production of goods on behalf of the client that in any case stands exempted by virtue of such activity being viewed as manufacture. In my opinion, as per the Notification, the exemption is applicable only when it is “production of goods on behalf of the client” as it does not speak of the “processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” explicitly.

Alternatively, if the words production and processing are used interchangeably as it appears to suggest in their liberal usage in the Notification as well as the definition of the taxable service in the Act, then it ultimately boils down to the usage of these produced/processed goods by the client of the job worker (including those in the gems and jewellery sector). The client of the job worker should use these produced/processed goods in their manufacturing activity and the resultant final products should be cleared only on payment of duty. If the final products at the client’s end are cleared without payment of duty then this exemption is not applicable and the job worker has to discharge service tax. Fortunately small time job workers (including those in the gems and jewellery sector) can benefit from the value-based exemption introduced by Notification No. 6/05 ST dated 01.03.05 irrespective of the treatment meted to the term “processing”. Anyway the drafting of this Notification has put the job worker in any sector, including the gems and jewellery segment at the mercy of information furnished by the client. In any case this needs an immediate clarification or an amendment in the Notification to include “processing for, or on behalf of the client” to avoid unnecessary litigations in the field.

(The author is working with the Department and the views expressed are strictly personal)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension