Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Wednesday , August 27, 2014 | Updated : Aug 27, 11:26 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Customs - Valuation - Proof of imports of identical goods at higher value not given to appellant - Assessment Order set aside; however SCN survives: SC (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax - Board and CCs authorized to issue instructions - Is Principal CC covered? (See 'DDT' Column) ST - Support services provided to run business of clients by aiding them in marketing, in obtaining loans from FIs, training of their personnel do not fall within category of 'Consultancy Service' let alone 'Management Consultancy Service' - Appeal allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Passing of Review orders by Committee of CCs - Extension of limitation period (See 'Guest' Column) Income tax - Whether provisions of Sec 41(1) come into play only when there is cessation of a liability - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') 8.75% interest rate for PF Deposits for current fiscal recommended (See 'Mixed buzz') Service Tax - Legislative changes to be effective from 1st October (See 'DDT') CX - Refund - Payment deduced by client for failing to supply specified quantity of goods during specified period - whatever amount appellant had received less from buyer they are entitled to take refund of duty component involved in deducted amount: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') North Block orders forensic audit of Kolkata-based UCO Bank books FM calls for expansion of capital base of ADB to sustain key role in development financing CBI traps Chennai ROC Registrar accepting Rs 10 lakh bribe Misuse of CENVAT Credit – Rule 12AAA of CCR, 2004 amended to include provider of Taxable service (See Notification 25 in 'What's New) ST on Radio Taxi services, Ads in internet websites & on film screen in theatres to be effective from Oct 1, 2014 + STR, 1994 amended w.e.f 1.10.2014 – new rules 11 & 12 inserted to provide for determination of Rate of exchange & Power to issue supplementary instructions (See Notification in 'What's New) High Court never stated that service has to be rendered to factories governed by Factories Act, 1948 – Telecom Service provider can also take credit on Outdoor Catering Service: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Govt appoints four New Governors; Kalyan Singh goes to Rajasthan & Mridula Sinha to Goa Coal is paramount Lord of industry; allocation of a coal block is nothing but largesse, says SC Cus - Provisions of s. 27 are not applicable to Interest paid for warehoused goods u/s 61(2) - Consequently, bar of unjust enrichment is not applicable - Appeal allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Disposal of confiscated cylinders filled with refrigerant gases - CBEC proposes to issue instructions (See 'DDT' Column) Income tax - Whether even if investments made by assessee earn no income, expenditure incurred on such investments is liable to disallowed under Rule 8D(2) - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Scope & Ambit of Works Contract (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) CCI orders Rs 2545 Cr penalty on 14 auto manufacturers Aerated waters - Whether contaminated, under or over filled bottles or badly crowned bottles amounts to manufactured finished goods, which are required to be entered under R.G.-1 register & which are exigible to duty? - 'No' High Court answers question of law in favour of assessee (See 'Breaking News') Tamil Nadu CM against Area Based Exemptions (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether in case original return filed by assessee is treated as non est, such return cannot be considered as a valid return at any point of time: ITAT (See '2014-TIOL-570') Economy in use of paper - FinMin Directions (See 'DDT')
 
Bookmark and Share
Service tax on job work : Still in a mess!

By Santosh Hatwar

BUSINESS Auxiliary service was in the news recently thanks to the ingenuity of certain field officers’ over enthusiasm in netting small time job workers in the Gems and jewellery sector into the service tax fold. This prompted the Board to issue a circular No. 341/13/2005 TRU dated 12.05.2005 on the subject of levy of service tax on certain processes under taken on job work basis in gems and jewellery sector. The changes brought in by the Finance Bill 2005 (now Finance Act 2005) in the definition of Business Auxiliary service was also mentioned and finally it was stated that those processes which are outsourced in gem and jewellery sector which amount to manufacture within the scope of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not be liable for service tax. Production of goods on behalf of the client is leviable to service tax only if such production activity does not amount to manufacture. Is there anything new in the clarification? Does it clarify anything at all in the first place except for restating what is available in the statute? Let us delve into the provisions related to this levy that has been the subject of one controversy or the other since its inception.

The scope of Business auxiliary service for the purpose of levy of service tax was extended with effect from 10.09.2004 to include “production of goods on behalf of the client” by amending clause (19) of Section 65 of the Finance Act 1994. This clause was further amended by Section 88 of the finance bill 2005 by substituting the existing clause with a new clause viz., “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client”. Further vide Notification No. 8/05 ST dated 01.03.05, “production on behalf of the client” is exempted from service tax if these job worked goods are produced from the raw materials or semi finished goods supplied by the client and these are returned back to their clients for use in or in relation to the manufacture of final products on which excise duty is payable. This concept of “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” is commonly referred to as job work in trade parlance.

As per the explanations to this Notification the production of goods undertaken should not amount to manufacture in terms of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and duty payable goods does not include goods which are wholly exempt from duty or nil duty goods. For the purpose of this Notification the words production and processing are used interchangeably though they do not mean the same. The Web definition of production in economics is manufacturing or mining or growing something (usually in large quantities) for sale; e.g., "he introduced more efficient methods of production”. Similarly processing is defined as preparing or putting through a prescribed procedure for e.g., "the processing of ore to obtain minerals". In Webster’s college dictionary production means, “ the act of producing; creating or manufacture” and processing means “ a systematic series of actions directed to some end”; “ a continuous action, operation, or series of changes taking place in a defined manner”.

If we look at these definitions in the backdrop of excise and service tax laws it is clear that production and manufacture mean one and the same and therefore can be used interchangeably which is normally the case. But when it comes to processing, it may or may not amount to production or manufacture depending on the nature of processes involved in the act. However, the explanation (i) to the Notification states that this production should not amount to manufacture thereby resolving to certain extent that production is not always manufacture in service tax. So far so good, but what is the fate of “processing”? The service tax levy is on “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” and the exemption is given only to “production on behalf of client”.

As is normally understood the activity of “production of goods on behalf of the client” is the practice followed in the pharmaceutical industry i.e., manufacture on loan licensee basis, jewellery industry, textiles and a host of other sectors of industry that are either process intensive or labour intensive. In all these cases normally the job worker is treated as manufacturer and excise dues are discharged by the job worker only. As the Notification speaks of exempting only production of goods on behalf of the client that in any case stands exempted by virtue of such activity being viewed as manufacture. In my opinion, as per the Notification, the exemption is applicable only when it is “production of goods on behalf of the client” as it does not speak of the “processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” explicitly.

Alternatively, if the words production and processing are used interchangeably as it appears to suggest in their liberal usage in the Notification as well as the definition of the taxable service in the Act, then it ultimately boils down to the usage of these produced/processed goods by the client of the job worker (including those in the gems and jewellery sector). The client of the job worker should use these produced/processed goods in their manufacturing activity and the resultant final products should be cleared only on payment of duty. If the final products at the client’s end are cleared without payment of duty then this exemption is not applicable and the job worker has to discharge service tax. Fortunately small time job workers (including those in the gems and jewellery sector) can benefit from the value-based exemption introduced by Notification No. 6/05 ST dated 01.03.05 irrespective of the treatment meted to the term “processing”. Anyway the drafting of this Notification has put the job worker in any sector, including the gems and jewellery segment at the mercy of information furnished by the client. In any case this needs an immediate clarification or an amendment in the Notification to include “processing for, or on behalf of the client” to avoid unnecessary litigations in the field.

(The author is working with the Department and the views expressed are strictly personal)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension