Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Saturday , August 27, 2016 | Updated : Aug 27, 15:20 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
Board issues guidelines prescribing the distance to be maintained between hazardous cargo/explosives and general cargo or administrative building in a Customs area (See 'Notifn 40' in 'What's New') Income tax - Whether licencee can claim entitlement to business loss on account of forfieture of licence fee, where the loss, if any, on account of forfeiture was sustained not by said licencee but by tranferee - NO: SC (See 'Breaking News') CX - NE exemption – Notfn 11/2007 is hit by promissory estoppel; cannot be sustained and accordingly is set aside - petitioner would continue to get benefit in terms of promise re-extended by OM dated 01.04.2007 for remaining period in terms of NEIP: HC Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed (See 'ST se GST tak') I-T - Whether if toddy is tapped from coconut trees grown by members of a cooperative society and marketed for profit, such income is entitled to exemption u/s 80P - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') PM orders setting up of Task Force to prepare action plan for next three Olympics in 2020, 2024 & 2028 DANICS officers seek DoPT intervention for cadre review (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cargo operators from RCS airports - Duty benefits granted to ATF (See 'Notifn 32' in What's New) CBEC notifies new Customs exchange rate for South African Rand (See 'Notifn 117' in 'What's New') Board of Approval grants extension to seven SEZ CBEC issues revised guidelines in respect of disposal of confiscated goods through NCCF/Kendriya Bhandar & other Consumer co-operatives (See 'Cir 39' in 'What's New') Sales Tax - Whether if there is movement of goods sans complete papers, penalty is only recourse to recoup loss of Revenue and there is no need to prove mens rea in such cases - YES: Supreme Court (See 'Breaking News') India needs to change laws; remove meaningless procedures & speed up processes to go beyond mere incremental progress: PM Goa to ratify GST Bill next Wednesday; Congress to extend support, says Opposition leader in Assembly Naidu asks IIS officers to adapt to new technologies (See 'Mixed Buzz') Trade tax Act - Whether benefit of exemption u/s 4B(1) can be restricted to a manufacturer only who is engaged in sale of goods, when said provision itself extends such benefit to first purchaser who sells goods to another dealer having valid recognition certificate u/s 4B(2) - NO: SC (See 'Breaking News') Customs Rummaging – Cash-ual? (See 'DDT' Column) I-T - Whether mere mentioning of actual assets of a newly constructed plot by a developer in valuation report, without disclosing same in return, consitutes sufficient reasons for Revenue to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment - YES: SC (See 'Breaking News') Refund of unutilized CENVAT Credit on closure of factory is admissible - As LB decision relied on by Revenue did not consider High Court order allowing refund, same cannot be followed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Customs – Exemption from CVD – Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Review Petition in SRF case (See 'DDT') Don't Publish Names of Advocates or Judges - High Court Tells Publications (See 'DDT') Chennai Customs seizes foreign cigarettes worth Rs 7 Cr smuggled as plywood sheets Joint Press Meet with Home Minister - J&K CM abruptly wraps up media briefing Scorpene Submarines - leakage of documents - India takes up issue with French Govt Commerce Minister favours 2% interest subvention for MSME Sector Devender Singh transferred to Mumbai from Chandigarh (See 'Tribunal' in Excise) TN VAT - Section 19(20) inserted by way of amendment is a provision which is made for first time to detriment of dealers and, therefore, cannot have a retro effect; constitutional validity upheld: SC (See 'Breaking News') Rs 500 Crore Hiranandani Communities first industrial park to be set up in Pune Union Budget Presentation - Why January? Why not November? (See 'THE COB (WEB)' Column) Cus - Commissioner(A) clearly found that Benzopyrrole is freely importable on basis of DGFT letter, yet denied benefit - without contesting, content of letter could not have been rejected - appeal allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Treading the GST Path-1 - A 'Principal' mismatch? (See 'ST se GST tak') GST Compliance - A Costly Affair (See 'ST se GST tak') CX - In absence of any restrictive clause in agreement, amount received by respondent towards pre-delivery inspection, erection/installation/commissioning charges are not includible in AV: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Cabinet okays Central Scheme to aid to victims of terror attacks (See 'Mixed Buzz')
 
Bookmark and Share
Service tax on job work : Still in a mess!

By Santosh Hatwar

BUSINESS Auxiliary service was in the news recently thanks to the ingenuity of certain field officers’ over enthusiasm in netting small time job workers in the Gems and jewellery sector into the service tax fold. This prompted the Board to issue a circular No. 341/13/2005 TRU dated 12.05.2005 on the subject of levy of service tax on certain processes under taken on job work basis in gems and jewellery sector. The changes brought in by the Finance Bill 2005 (now Finance Act 2005) in the definition of Business Auxiliary service was also mentioned and finally it was stated that those processes which are outsourced in gem and jewellery sector which amount to manufacture within the scope of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not be liable for service tax. Production of goods on behalf of the client is leviable to service tax only if such production activity does not amount to manufacture. Is there anything new in the clarification? Does it clarify anything at all in the first place except for restating what is available in the statute? Let us delve into the provisions related to this levy that has been the subject of one controversy or the other since its inception.

The scope of Business auxiliary service for the purpose of levy of service tax was extended with effect from 10.09.2004 to include “production of goods on behalf of the client” by amending clause (19) of Section 65 of the Finance Act 1994. This clause was further amended by Section 88 of the finance bill 2005 by substituting the existing clause with a new clause viz., “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client”. Further vide Notification No. 8/05 ST dated 01.03.05, “production on behalf of the client” is exempted from service tax if these job worked goods are produced from the raw materials or semi finished goods supplied by the client and these are returned back to their clients for use in or in relation to the manufacture of final products on which excise duty is payable. This concept of “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” is commonly referred to as job work in trade parlance.

As per the explanations to this Notification the production of goods undertaken should not amount to manufacture in terms of Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and duty payable goods does not include goods which are wholly exempt from duty or nil duty goods. For the purpose of this Notification the words production and processing are used interchangeably though they do not mean the same. The Web definition of production in economics is manufacturing or mining or growing something (usually in large quantities) for sale; e.g., "he introduced more efficient methods of production”. Similarly processing is defined as preparing or putting through a prescribed procedure for e.g., "the processing of ore to obtain minerals". In Webster’s college dictionary production means, “ the act of producing; creating or manufacture” and processing means “ a systematic series of actions directed to some end”; “ a continuous action, operation, or series of changes taking place in a defined manner”.

If we look at these definitions in the backdrop of excise and service tax laws it is clear that production and manufacture mean one and the same and therefore can be used interchangeably which is normally the case. But when it comes to processing, it may or may not amount to production or manufacture depending on the nature of processes involved in the act. However, the explanation (i) to the Notification states that this production should not amount to manufacture thereby resolving to certain extent that production is not always manufacture in service tax. So far so good, but what is the fate of “processing”? The service tax levy is on “production or processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” and the exemption is given only to “production on behalf of client”.

As is normally understood the activity of “production of goods on behalf of the client” is the practice followed in the pharmaceutical industry i.e., manufacture on loan licensee basis, jewellery industry, textiles and a host of other sectors of industry that are either process intensive or labour intensive. In all these cases normally the job worker is treated as manufacturer and excise dues are discharged by the job worker only. As the Notification speaks of exempting only production of goods on behalf of the client that in any case stands exempted by virtue of such activity being viewed as manufacture. In my opinion, as per the Notification, the exemption is applicable only when it is “production of goods on behalf of the client” as it does not speak of the “processing of goods for, or on behalf of the client” explicitly.

Alternatively, if the words production and processing are used interchangeably as it appears to suggest in their liberal usage in the Notification as well as the definition of the taxable service in the Act, then it ultimately boils down to the usage of these produced/processed goods by the client of the job worker (including those in the gems and jewellery sector). The client of the job worker should use these produced/processed goods in their manufacturing activity and the resultant final products should be cleared only on payment of duty. If the final products at the client’s end are cleared without payment of duty then this exemption is not applicable and the job worker has to discharge service tax. Fortunately small time job workers (including those in the gems and jewellery sector) can benefit from the value-based exemption introduced by Notification No. 6/05 ST dated 01.03.05 irrespective of the treatment meted to the term “processing”. Anyway the drafting of this Notification has put the job worker in any sector, including the gems and jewellery segment at the mercy of information furnished by the client. In any case this needs an immediate clarification or an amendment in the Notification to include “processing for, or on behalf of the client” to avoid unnecessary litigations in the field.

(The author is working with the Department and the views expressed are strictly personal)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
Visit TIOLCorplaws.com
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Reports
  • Customs Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • CCRs - 2004
  • Central Excise Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • GST Kitty
  • Notifications
  • Service Tax Rules
  • 37B Order
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • FDI Approved
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension