News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Cus – Revenue cannot agitate an issue before CESTAT which issue was not in SCN or taken before Commr(A) - Revenue appeal rejected: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, JUNE 23, 2014 : THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The respondent filed a bill of entry seeking classification of the imported Palm Kernal Acid Oil under CTH 38231900.

Samples were drawn and sent to Chemical Examinerand based on the reports received a SCN was issued for classifying the imported goods under CTH 15132910 and this was upheld by the Assistant Commissioner.

The lower appellate authority decided the classification of the imported goods under CTH 38231900 and allowed the appeal of the respondent.

As this order was not honoured, the respondent approached the Gujarat High Court and the High Court disposed of the petition by ordering the release of the goods subject to certain conditions but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the classification and suggested to the Department to request the Tribunal to give an early hearing in the matter of the appeal filed by them.

Theapplication seeking early hearing of the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed by the Tribunal.

The respondent submitted that there is no argument advocated by the Revenue that imported goods need classification under CTH 1515 and Commissioner (Appeals) had only the option of deciding the classification of imported goods either under CTH 1513 or CTH 38231900, as per the show cause notice issued. Further, Revenue has not taken any ground in the appeal as to why classification decided by Commissioner (Appeals) under CTH 38231900 is not correct.

Inasmuch as it is the submission of the respondent that at this stage Revenue cannot go beyond the scope of SCN and contend that CTH 1515 is the correct classification of the imported goods.

The Bench observed –

“6. Heard both sides and perused the case records. The issue involved in the present appeal filed by the Revenue is whether classification of the imported goods Palm Kernal Acid Oil can now be made under CTH 1515 when the original contest was for classification of the imported goods under either CTH 38231900 or CTH 15132910 before the Adjudicating authority and the first appellate authority. The dispute taken before the first appellate authority by the importer (present respondent) was decided under CTH 38231900 after getting further testing of the sample of imported goods. Even after receipt of the subsequent test report, as per the directions of first appellate authority it was not agitated by the Revenue that classification of the imported goods could be other than CTH 38231900 or CTH 15132910. When an issue is not the subject matter of the show cause notice first issued and was not agitated before the lower authorities, it has to be held that Revenue has no justification in agitating an issue before this Bench which was not agitated before the lower authorities. Accordingly, the lower authorities cannot be directed to go beyond the scope of the show cause notice.”

Holding that there is no merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, the same was rejected.

(See 2014-TIOL-1093-CESTAT-AHM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.