News Update

‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthi’s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
ST - Once pre-deposit of principal liability was stayed it would not be proper to direct that entire interest component on service tax assessed be deposited as condition precedent for hearing of appeal : High Court

By TIOL News Service

CHANDIGARH, MAY, 2014: A SCN was issued to the assessee for recovery of Service Tax of Rs.36.94 lakhs. The adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs.35,14,534/- and also imposed penalty and interest.

The Commissioner (A) dismissed their appeal. The CESTAT ordered the assessee to pay the entire demand of Rs.35,14,534/- by 15.11.2013 for obtaining stay.

This order was challenged and the High Court directed the Tribunal to decide the stay application on merits and the parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal on 24.1.2014. In pursuance thereof, the Tribunal while disposing of the application stayed the entire demand of service tax and directed the assessee to pay interest component on the service tax assessed upto date within four weeks failing which it was informed that the appeal shall stand rejected.

So, the assessee is again before the High Court by filing an appeal u/s 35G of the CEA, 1944 and seeks modification of the Stay order passed by the CESTAT.

It is submitted that once the pre-deposit of the principal liability was waived, the interest being consequential was also required to be waived off by the Tribunal.

The High Court observed –

"…Once the realization of the principal liability was stayed and condition of pre-deposit was waived off, it would not be proper to direct that the entire interest component on the service tax assessed be deposited as a condition precedent for hearing of the appeal."

In fine, the appeal was allowed and the Tribunal was requested to decide the appeal expeditiously.

(See 2014-TIOL-859-HC-P&H-ST)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.