News Update

Cus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiCus - The penalty imposed on assessee was set aside by Tribunal against which revenue is in appeal is far below the threshold limit fixed under Notification issued by CBDT, thus on the ground of monetary policy, revenue cannot proceed with this appeal: HCGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - If assessee is not charging VAT paid on purchase of goods & services to its P&L account i.e., not claiming it as expenditure, there is no requirement to treat refund of such VAT as income: ITATBengal Governor restricts entry of State FM and local police into Raj BhawanI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATCops flatten camps of protesting students at Columbia UnivI-T - No additions are permitted on account of bogus purchases, if evidence submitted on purchase going into export and further details provided of sellers remaining uncontroverted: ITATTurkey stops all trades with Israel over GazaI-T- Provisions of Section 56(2)(vii)(a) cannot be invoked, where a necessary condition of the money received without consideration by assessee, has not been fulfilled: ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political eventsI-T- As per settled position in law, cooperative housing society can claim deduction u/s 80P, if interest is earned on deposit of own funds in nationalised banks: ITATApple reports lower revenue despite good start of the yearI-T- Since difference in valuation is minor, considering specific exclusion provision benefit is granted to assessee : ITATHome-grown tech of thermal camera transferred to IndustryI-T - Presumption u/s 292C would apply only to person proceeded u/s 153A and not for assessee u/s 153C: ITATECI asks parties to cease registering voters for beneficiary-oriented schemes under guise of surveys
 
ST - Appellant providing training and coaching to individuals in field of flying of aircraft for obtaining CPL from DGCA - Activity not liable to ST under Commercial Training or Coaching Services: High Court

By TIOL News Service

ALLAHABAD, MAY 26, 2014: THE assessee is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is running a Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Institute at Kanpur. It is engaged in providing training and coaching to individuals in the field of flying of aircraft for obtaining Commercial Pilot License from the Director Civil Aviation (DGCA), New Delhi. It is also engaged in providing training for obtaining Basic Aircraft Maintenance Engineering Licence.

In the proceedings, the CESTAT, in view of the decision of the Delhi High Court in Indian Institute of Aircraft Engineering vs. Union of India 2013-TIOL-430-HC-DEL-ST concluded that service tax could not be levied on the assessee.

The CCE, Kanpur has preferred an appeal before the Allahabad High Court against this order.

The following questions of law have been framed:

i.) Whether, the respondent is liable to service Tax on Flying Training Institute and Aircraft Engineering Institutes under Commercial Training or Coaching Services?

ii.) Whether, the course Completion Certificate offered by such Institutes, to successful students, qualifies as any certificate of diploma or degree or any educational qualification recognized by law for the time being in force or not?

The High Court observed that a similar issue arose before the Delhi High Court in Indian Institute of Aircraft Engineering.

After liberally extracting passages from the cited decision, the High Court held that the Counsel for the revenue had not been able to persuade the Court to take a different view.

Holding that the appeal filed by the revenue, therefore, will not give rise to any substantial question of law, the appeal was dismissed.

(See 2014-TIOL-837-HC-ALL-ST)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.