News Update

ICG seizes 86 kg narcotics worth Rs 600 croreChief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan concludes his official visit to France9 killed as two vehicles ram into each other in ChhattisgarhConsumer court orders Swiggy to compensate for failure to deliver Ice CreamRequisite Checks for Appeals - Court FeeI-T - Members of Settlement Commission appointed amongst persons of integrity & outstanding ability & having special knowledge in/experience of direct taxes; unfortunate that SETCOM's orders are challenged without establishing them to be contrary to law or lacking in jurisdiction: HCThe 'taxing' story of Malabar Parota, calories notwithstanding!I-T - Unless a case of bias, fraud or malice is alleged, then Department cannot assail SETCOM's order: HCCentre allows export of 99,150 MT onion to Bangladesh, UAE, Bhutan, Bahrain, Mauritius & LankaI-T- Re-assessment vide Faceless Assessment u/s 144 of I-T Act, is barred by Section 31 of IBC 2016, which is binding upon all creditors of corporate debtor: HCPension Portals of all Pension Disbursing Banks to be integratedI-T- Resolution Plan under IBC, once approved, nullifies any claims pertaining to a period prior to approval of said Plan: HC‘Flash Mob’ drive in London seeks support for PM ModiI-T - Once assessee has produced all supporting documents which includes profit & loss account, balance sheet and copy of ITR of creditors, then identity & creditworthiness is established: ITATTo deliver political message, Pak Sessions judge abducted and then released: KPKI-T - Assessee shall provide monthly figures to arrive at year-end average of deposits received from members, interest paid thereon & investments made in FDs from external funds, for calculating Sec 80P deduction: ITATMaersk to invest USD 600 mn in Nigerian seaport infraI-T - It shall not be necessary to issue authorization u/s 132 separately in name of each person where authorization has been issued mentioning thereon more than one person: ITATChile announces 3-day national mourning after three police officers killedI-T- Since facts have not yet been verified by AO, issue of CSR expenditure can be remanded back for reconsideration: ITATIndian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreI-T - Failure to substantiate cash deposits by employer during festival will not automatically lead to additions u/s 68, in absence of any opportunity of hearing: ITATGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionGST - There is no material on record to show as to why the registration is sought to be cancelled retrospectively - Order cannot be sustained: HCIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termST - Court cannot examine the issue, which is only a question of fact and evidence and not of the law - Petition dismissed: HCGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand notice
 
ST - Services of financial leasing provided to clients - Taxable event occurs when hire-purchase contract is entered - ST to be paid at rate prevailing at time of entering lease agreements & not at time of receipt of EMI: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAY 19, 2014: THE appellant is a lease finance company and provided services of financial leasing under the category of ‘Banking and Finance' services.  The lower authorities have confirmed a demand of Service Tax of Rs.18.75 lakhs on the lease agreements entered by the applicant with their clients between 16.7.2001 & 13.5.2003 and 14.5.2003 to 10.9.2004 on the ground that the applicant had not discharged the correct service tax liability.  The contention of the Revenue is that the applicant has discharged the service tax liability @5% and 8%, whereas they are required to pay the service tax @8% and 10.2% (including EC) prevailing at the time of receipt of the EMI.

While seeking stay the applicant submitted that the services are provided on the date of providing the assets on Hire purchase or Financial lease, which normally is the date of entering into the agreement with the hirer or lessee as the case may be; that entire terms of contract are directed at the time of entering into the contract; that they collected the EMI payable by the customers and also included the liability of service tax; that rate of service tax during the agreement was only 5% to 8% and they have paid the service tax as per the agreement entered into by them. Reliance is also placed on final order of the Tribunal in the case of M/s Art Leasing Ltd. vs. CCE, Cochin - 2007-TIOL-1493-CESTAT-BANG.

The Bench had observed that the case law cited by the applicant ‘seemed' to cover the issue in favour of the applicant and accordingly granted a stay in the matter.

We reported that order as 2008-TIOL-1816-CESTAT-MUM.

The appeal was heard recently.

And the CESTAT held that the issue is fully settled by the order of the Tribunal in the case of Art Leasing Ltd. inasmuch as -

+ When the Hire purchase contract is entered, the taxable event occurs.

+ The installment payments are only obligations of the hirer.

+ The finding that the appellant continues to provide service during the payment of installments is not correct.

+ Therefore, the rate of Service Tax will be the rate prevailing on the date on which the contract is entered into.

In fine, the order of the CCE, Pune-III was set aside and the appeal was allowed.

In passing: The wait is over.

(See 2014-TIOL-794-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.