Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Sunday , August 28, 2016 | Updated : Aug 27, 22:02 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
India speaking to Brazil to produce pulses for India: Ram Vilas Paswan Law Minister wants better representation in international arbitration Board issues guidelines prescribing the distance to be maintained between hazardous cargo/explosives and general cargo or administrative building in a Customs area (See 'Notifn 40' in 'What's New') Income tax - Whether licencee can claim entitlement to business loss on account of forfieture of licence fee, where the loss, if any, on account of forfeiture was sustained not by said licencee but by tranferee - NO: SC (See 'Breaking News') CX - NE exemption – Notfn 11/2007 is hit by promissory estoppel; cannot be sustained and accordingly is set aside - petitioner would continue to get benefit in terms of promise re-extended by OM dated 01.04.2007 for remaining period in terms of NEIP: HC Treading the GST Path - II - ISD - Decodifed (See 'ST se GST tak') I-T - Whether if toddy is tapped from coconut trees grown by members of a cooperative society and marketed for profit, such income is entitled to exemption u/s 80P - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') PM orders setting up of Task Force to prepare action plan for next three Olympics in 2020, 2024 & 2028 DANICS officers seek DoPT intervention for cadre review (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cargo operators from RCS airports - Duty benefits granted to ATF (See 'Notifn 32' in What's New) CBEC notifies new Customs exchange rate for South African Rand (See 'Notifn 117' in 'What's New') Board of Approval grants extension to seven SEZ CBEC issues revised guidelines in respect of disposal of confiscated goods through NCCF/Kendriya Bhandar & other Consumer co-operatives (See 'Cir 39' in 'What's New') India needs to change laws; remove meaningless procedures & speed up processes to go beyond mere incremental progress: PM Goa to ratify GST Bill next Wednesday; Congress to extend support, says Opposition leader in Assembly Naidu asks IIS officers to adapt to new technologies (See 'Mixed Buzz') Customs Rummaging – Cash-ual? (See 'DDT' Column) Customs – Exemption from CVD – Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Review Petition in SRF case (See 'DDT') Don't Publish Names of Advocates or Judges - High Court Tells Publications (See 'DDT') Chennai Customs seizes foreign cigarettes worth Rs 7 Cr smuggled as plywood sheets Union Budget Presentation - Why January? Why not November? (See 'THE COB (WEB)' Column) Treading the GST Path-1 - A 'Principal' mismatch? (See 'ST se GST tak') GST Compliance - A Costly Affair (See 'ST se GST tak')
 
Bookmark and Share
Income Tax Cadre Review : A review

TIOL-DDT 122
26 05 2005
Thursday

One reason for restructuring of the department, as stated in the Cabinet Note, was poor career management and promotion prospects resulting in demoralization of officers in the Indian Revenue Service making them lag behind other comparable Central Services. And so, several posts were created, but not all of them filled up. This indicated that these posts would be redundant and not necessary. Incidentally, according to the instructions of Ministry of Finance in O.M No7 (7)-E (Co-ord)/93 dated 3 May 1993, these posts would be deemed to have been abolished if they continued to remain unfilled for a period exceeding one year. Should there be another review to abolish these posts?

At What Cost?

The Board did not have a mechanism to monitor the progress of its promise of a saving of Rs.3.05 crore on salaries and wages consequent to upgradation of posts after restructuring as no separate accounts were maintained. So nobody knows whether the costs really came down.

Results of promised benefits of restructuring

Revenue did go up, not because of increased number of Commissioners, but may be in spite of them.

Tax Recovery

The administrative machinery of tax recovery was strengthened by allocating one TRO exclusively to each range consequent to the restructuring of the department. Sanctioned strength of TROs was increased from 204 as on 31 March 2001 to 472 after restructuring representing an increase of 131 percent. The sanctioned strength was further increased to 509 as on 31 March 2003 but decreased to 462 as on 31 March 2004.

The position of demand recovered during the year remained at around 19 percent after restructuring, which was already achieved in 1998-99.

Case disposal:

The total number of cases disposed of had declined from 11.11 per cent in 1999-2000 to 0.96 percent in 2003-04.. The position of prosecutions launched, convictions obtained, offences compounded and acquittals allowed has, not changed for the better after restructuring of the Income Tax Department.

Revenue from Search:


Board has no statistics on this!.

Scrutiny

The completion of scrutiny assessments had decreased from 73.6 percent to 51.2 percent during the same period.

Productivity per Assessing Officer

The proposal made to the Union Cabinet by the Ministry/Board on ‘restructuring of Income Tax Department’ promised an estimated 200 percent increase in ‘productivity’ at organizational level.

This number of assessments has declined from 82.31 per assessing officer in 1999-2000 to 44.50 per assessing officer in 2003-04. Why? There are too many Commissioners and they actually interfered and blocked the progress of assessments.

Appeals

One of the benefits promised in the proposal of restructuring was immediate additional revenue gain of Rs.7500 crore by increasing the number of first appellate authorities and TROs. Besides, period for redressal of grievance was to be reduced from 18 months to six months.

Since the department was not maintaining statistics on revenue figures involved in appeals filed, disposed off and balance at the end of the year, the basis on which additional revenue gains of Rs.7,500 crore by increasing the number of CsIT (A) and TROs had been promised in the proposal to the Union Cabinet was not ascertainable.

The average number of appeals disposed off by each CIT (A) in a month during 1999-2000 was 43.12, which came down to 27.53 during 2003-04.

Interest on refunds

As per the proposal on restructuring, the interest burden was expected to be reduced by Rs.350 crore per annum with reduction in average time taken in issue of refunds. Neither had the amount of interest paid nor the average delay in payment of refund decreased as promised in the proposal for restructuring.

Delay in implementation of the scheme: Cabinet approved the scheme in August 2000. Revised jurisdictions were notified on 31 July 2001 for implementation by the department from 1 August 2001. One year was spent in revising the original orders and in implementation of the scheme of restructuring.

Transfer of records – No records are available to show that records have been transferred properly.

These are the findings of the CAG. The results in the other Board must be similar. But there are a few tips the CBEC can learn from CBDT, if they have not already learnt. Don’t maintain data on important aspects and even if they are made don’t make them available to Audit.

In spite of the risk of repetition, the CAG’s conclusions are worth recapitulating. The findings of the CAG are disturbing to put it mildly and deserve the urgent attention of the minister.

• There has been increase in revenue; to what extent this increase was directly attributable to efficiency and productivity improvement after restructuring was not ascertainable in audit.

• Large number of vacancies remained unfilled at various levels for a number of years indicating that these posts may not really be needed as the department’s performance at ‘macro level’ in terms of overall revenues realized and summary assessments completed has apparently improved despite these ‘vacancies’.

• After restructuring the average number of scrutiny assessments completed by an assessing officer had declined.
• In the absence of details of taxes collected as a result of scrutiny/ assessments that have stood the test at least at the first stage of appeal, improvement effected in the quality of scrutiny assessments was not ascertainable.

• Efficiency in bringing stop filers back to the tax net and the accretion of revenues from this function was not ascertainable.

• Almost 46 percent of outstanding arrear demand was locked up in appeals at the CIT(A) level. Pace of disposal of appeals at CIT(A) level was not according to the norms indicated by the Board and there was no mechanism to establish and relate the fact of release of tax demands for recovery to increase in the number of posts of CIT(A) after restructuring.

• The increase in number of summary assessments disposed off annually after restructuring was almost entirely attributable to “outsourcing” of data entry and related functions rather than direct efficiency or productivity improvement after restructuring.

• No separate account of the costs incidental to restructuring was maintained. Substantial expenditure consequent to and related to restructuring exercise had not been separately budgeted or projected as expenditure relating to restructuring.

• In the absence of clear targets and well-designed, transparent and verifiable criteria of efficiency and productivity, monitoring has suffered. There was no dedicated or clearly identified Wing/Division in the Board to effectively monitor efficiency and productivity improvements consequent to restructuring.

• Apart from introduction of new chain system of internal audit and new system of inspections, online tax accounting system and electronic filing of TDS returns, audit did not notice evidence of concerted efforts at rationalization of work norms or practices after restructuring. Despite the introduction of the chain system of internal audit, the internal control of the department had weakened after restructuring.

(from CAG’s report to Parliament).

Import of metallic waste - DGFT adds more ICDs

The shock of the container blasts have died down and slowly more and more ICDs are being added to the list of stations through which the scrap can be imported. It is sincerely hoped that these new additional places have the infrastructure for proper scrutiny. As usual, after the DGFT, the CBES has to come up with another notification to actually make the DGFT PN effective.

PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 10 /(RE-2005)/2004-2009, Dated: May 20, 2005

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a Nice Day.

Mail your comments to
vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
Visit TIOLCorplaws.com
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Reports
  • Customs Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • CCRs - 2004
  • Central Excise Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • GST Kitty
  • Notifications
  • Service Tax Rules
  • 37B Order
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • FDI Approved
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension