Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Friday , February 27, 2015 | Updated : Feb 27, 19:06 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
CBEC reduces tariff value of Gold, Silver & RBD Palmolein (See 'What's New) CBEC introduces risk-based audit for Central Excise and Service Tax (See 'Cir 995' in What's New) Take a decisive time-bound call on FFC's taxation & other reforms (See 'Editorial') Justice Amitava Roy from Orissa HC joins Supreme Court today, taking total tally to 29 against sanctioned posts of 31 Judges Wiping Every Tear From Every Eye' growth is possible: Economic Survey (See 'Mixed Buzz') Economic Survey hints at mega reforms on anvil; competitive disadvantage for exports; fiscal deficit within control (See 'Breaking News') Services Sector dominates FDI equity inflows; WTO negotiations to have serious bearings on its growth (See 'Mixed Buzz') Infrastructure growth higher than Industrial growth: Survey (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Clients who were serviced were non-residents, and as such services rendered are export services - such service to foreign clients paying consideration in forex would not visit respondent with liability to pay ST: HC (See 'Breaking News') India needs to create additional Fiscal Space: Survey (See 'Mixed Buzz') IT & IT-es continue to be a key job creator & single largest contributor to Services exports (See 'Mixed Buzz') Post 06.08.2014, 7.5% pre-deposit is mandatory - Right of appeal granted by statute is conditional one and condition is not onerous: High Court (See 'Breaking News') CE/ST/Customs – Appeals – Mandatory Pre-deposit – Unconstitutional? (See 'DDT' Column) I-T - Whether if an assessee once accepts a judicial order, it is not open to it to assail same for reasons that different decisions were subsequently rendered on same issue - YES: HC (See 'Breaking News') Govt should check facts before proclaiming itself as ace runner (See 'ICE CUBES') ST - Service under Manpower Recruitment Service envisages supply of labour per se - Work undertaken is harvesting of sugarcane and transporting same to sugar factory for which labour is employed - sugarcane belongs to sugar factory, therefore, activity undertaken is ‘BAS' and not as alleged: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Reversal of credit u/r 4(5)(a) & rule 4(7) of CCR, 2004 - A Comparative Study (See 'ST se GST tak') ACC approves Secretary-level appointments (See 'Mixed Buzz') Whether availability of input tax credit as against assessed additional tax, divulges any intention on part of assessee to avoid payment of taxes (See '2015-TIOL-495') Bring Out Black Money - One More Amnesty Scheme (See 'DDT') VAT - Whether whenever there is a revision or levy of higher rate of tax or quantum of tax, levy of penalty is automatic: HC (See '2015-TIOL-496') Govt says there is no stopping of fresh appointments against vacancies arising out of retirements Govt to set up two New Ports at Sagar in West Bengal and Dugarajapatnam in Nellore District in AP CBEC & its field offices to remain open on Budget Day (See 'MISC' in Pitara) ITAT President transfers Members (JM) NRS Ganesan & Vikas Awasthy to Chennai & Pune respectively India's exports to China goes down but not imports (See 'Mixed Buzz') CBI arrests CX Superintendent & recovers Rs. 35 lacs during searches in delhi Rail Minister tables reform-packed budget with focus on safety, transparency, passenger satisfication and modernisation My Budget Wish-List - What all Mr Jaitley can do! (See 'The Cob(Web) Column) E-payment - Department advises importer to pay duty twice due to system failure - then refuses to refund (See 'DDT' Column) Finance Commission Report on 'Devolution of Taxes' and Future of 'GST Bill' (See 'ST se GST tak')
 
Bookmark and Share
Income Tax Cadre Review : A review

TIOL-DDT 122
26 05 2005
Thursday

One reason for restructuring of the department, as stated in the Cabinet Note, was poor career management and promotion prospects resulting in demoralization of officers in the Indian Revenue Service making them lag behind other comparable Central Services. And so, several posts were created, but not all of them filled up. This indicated that these posts would be redundant and not necessary. Incidentally, according to the instructions of Ministry of Finance in O.M No7 (7)-E (Co-ord)/93 dated 3 May 1993, these posts would be deemed to have been abolished if they continued to remain unfilled for a period exceeding one year. Should there be another review to abolish these posts?

At What Cost?

The Board did not have a mechanism to monitor the progress of its promise of a saving of Rs.3.05 crore on salaries and wages consequent to upgradation of posts after restructuring as no separate accounts were maintained. So nobody knows whether the costs really came down.

Results of promised benefits of restructuring

Revenue did go up, not because of increased number of Commissioners, but may be in spite of them.

Tax Recovery

The administrative machinery of tax recovery was strengthened by allocating one TRO exclusively to each range consequent to the restructuring of the department. Sanctioned strength of TROs was increased from 204 as on 31 March 2001 to 472 after restructuring representing an increase of 131 percent. The sanctioned strength was further increased to 509 as on 31 March 2003 but decreased to 462 as on 31 March 2004.

The position of demand recovered during the year remained at around 19 percent after restructuring, which was already achieved in 1998-99.

Case disposal:

The total number of cases disposed of had declined from 11.11 per cent in 1999-2000 to 0.96 percent in 2003-04.. The position of prosecutions launched, convictions obtained, offences compounded and acquittals allowed has, not changed for the better after restructuring of the Income Tax Department.

Revenue from Search:


Board has no statistics on this!.

Scrutiny

The completion of scrutiny assessments had decreased from 73.6 percent to 51.2 percent during the same period.

Productivity per Assessing Officer

The proposal made to the Union Cabinet by the Ministry/Board on ‘restructuring of Income Tax Department’ promised an estimated 200 percent increase in ‘productivity’ at organizational level.

This number of assessments has declined from 82.31 per assessing officer in 1999-2000 to 44.50 per assessing officer in 2003-04. Why? There are too many Commissioners and they actually interfered and blocked the progress of assessments.

Appeals

One of the benefits promised in the proposal of restructuring was immediate additional revenue gain of Rs.7500 crore by increasing the number of first appellate authorities and TROs. Besides, period for redressal of grievance was to be reduced from 18 months to six months.

Since the department was not maintaining statistics on revenue figures involved in appeals filed, disposed off and balance at the end of the year, the basis on which additional revenue gains of Rs.7,500 crore by increasing the number of CsIT (A) and TROs had been promised in the proposal to the Union Cabinet was not ascertainable.

The average number of appeals disposed off by each CIT (A) in a month during 1999-2000 was 43.12, which came down to 27.53 during 2003-04.

Interest on refunds

As per the proposal on restructuring, the interest burden was expected to be reduced by Rs.350 crore per annum with reduction in average time taken in issue of refunds. Neither had the amount of interest paid nor the average delay in payment of refund decreased as promised in the proposal for restructuring.

Delay in implementation of the scheme: Cabinet approved the scheme in August 2000. Revised jurisdictions were notified on 31 July 2001 for implementation by the department from 1 August 2001. One year was spent in revising the original orders and in implementation of the scheme of restructuring.

Transfer of records – No records are available to show that records have been transferred properly.

These are the findings of the CAG. The results in the other Board must be similar. But there are a few tips the CBEC can learn from CBDT, if they have not already learnt. Don’t maintain data on important aspects and even if they are made don’t make them available to Audit.

In spite of the risk of repetition, the CAG’s conclusions are worth recapitulating. The findings of the CAG are disturbing to put it mildly and deserve the urgent attention of the minister.

• There has been increase in revenue; to what extent this increase was directly attributable to efficiency and productivity improvement after restructuring was not ascertainable in audit.

• Large number of vacancies remained unfilled at various levels for a number of years indicating that these posts may not really be needed as the department’s performance at ‘macro level’ in terms of overall revenues realized and summary assessments completed has apparently improved despite these ‘vacancies’.

• After restructuring the average number of scrutiny assessments completed by an assessing officer had declined.
• In the absence of details of taxes collected as a result of scrutiny/ assessments that have stood the test at least at the first stage of appeal, improvement effected in the quality of scrutiny assessments was not ascertainable.

• Efficiency in bringing stop filers back to the tax net and the accretion of revenues from this function was not ascertainable.

• Almost 46 percent of outstanding arrear demand was locked up in appeals at the CIT(A) level. Pace of disposal of appeals at CIT(A) level was not according to the norms indicated by the Board and there was no mechanism to establish and relate the fact of release of tax demands for recovery to increase in the number of posts of CIT(A) after restructuring.

• The increase in number of summary assessments disposed off annually after restructuring was almost entirely attributable to “outsourcing” of data entry and related functions rather than direct efficiency or productivity improvement after restructuring.

• No separate account of the costs incidental to restructuring was maintained. Substantial expenditure consequent to and related to restructuring exercise had not been separately budgeted or projected as expenditure relating to restructuring.

• In the absence of clear targets and well-designed, transparent and verifiable criteria of efficiency and productivity, monitoring has suffered. There was no dedicated or clearly identified Wing/Division in the Board to effectively monitor efficiency and productivity improvements consequent to restructuring.

• Apart from introduction of new chain system of internal audit and new system of inspections, online tax accounting system and electronic filing of TDS returns, audit did not notice evidence of concerted efforts at rationalization of work norms or practices after restructuring. Despite the introduction of the chain system of internal audit, the internal control of the department had weakened after restructuring.

(from CAG’s report to Parliament).

Import of metallic waste - DGFT adds more ICDs

The shock of the container blasts have died down and slowly more and more ICDs are being added to the list of stations through which the scrap can be imported. It is sincerely hoped that these new additional places have the infrastructure for proper scrutiny. As usual, after the DGFT, the CBES has to come up with another notification to actually make the DGFT PN effective.

PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 10 /(RE-2005)/2004-2009, Dated: May 20, 2005

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a Nice Day.

Mail your comments to
vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
Subscribe TIOL Tube Channel on YouTube
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension