News Update

Indian Coast Guard intercepts Pakistani boat with 86 kg drugs worth Rs 600 CroreGold watch of richest Titanic pax auctioned for USD 1.46 millionIraq is latest to criminalise same-sex marriage with max 15 yrs of jail-termUndersea quake of 6.5 magnitude strikes Java; No tsunami alert issuedZelensky says Russia shelling oil facilities to choke supply to Europe20 army men killed in blasts at army base in Cambodia3 Indian women from Gujarat died in mega SUV accident in USJNU switches to NET in place of entrance test for PhD admissionsGST - fake invoice - Patanjali served Rs 27 Cr demand noticeI-T - Bonafide claim of deduction by assessee which was accepted in first round of proceedings does not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars, simply because it was disallowed later: ITATIndia-bound oil tanker struck by Houthiā€™s missiles in Red SeaSCO Defence Ministers' Meeting endorses 'One Earth, One Family, One Future'RBI issues draft rules on digital lendingI-T - In order to invoke revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, twin conditions of error in order and also prejudice to interest of Revenue must be established independently: ITATCRPF senior official served notice of dismissal on charges of sexual harassmentIndian Air Force ushers in Digital Transformation with DigiLocker IntegrationColumbia faculty blames leadership for police action against protestersCX - When process undertaken by assessee does not amount to manufacture, even then CENVAT credit is admissible if such inputs are cleared on payment of duty which would amount to reversal of credit availed: CESTATGoogle to inject USD 3 bn investment in data centre in IndianaCus - The equipments are teaching accessories which enable students in a class to respond to queries and these equipments are used along with ADP machine, same merits classification under CTH 8471 60 29: CESTATUN says clearing Gaza mounds of rubble to take 14 yrsST - When issue is of interpretation, appellant should not be fastened with demand for extended period, the demand confirmed for extended period is set aside: CESTAT
 
CX - It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on matter, latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on subject: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 28, 2014: THE short question involved is whether the trade discount passed on by the appellant to Oil Marketing Company can be considered as trade discount or not and whether excise duty is leviable on this amount considering the same as part of the value of the goods sold.

The CCE, Mumbai-II confirmed the demand of Rs.1.68 crores for the period April, 2011 to October, 2011 along with interest and, therefore, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that huge demands have been raised by the Revenue in the matter since 2003 and eight appeals on the same issue have been filed before the CESTAT and the Tribunal had ordered pre-deposit of 6% of the duty demanded in all these cases and, therefore, a similar view should be taken in the present appeal also. Reliance is also placed on the decision in Bhagyanagar Gas Ltd. (2013-TIOL-241-CESTAT-BANG) wherein on the same issue the Tribunal had granted stay taking into account the fact that an amount of Rs.2.22 lakhs has been paid by the appellant against the confirmed demand of Rs.20.89 lakhs. It is also submitted that except for the demand for the period April, 2003 to March, 2008, all the other demands were for the normal period of time.

The Revenue representative submitted that in the matter of the last appeal which concerned the period July, 2010 to January, 2011, vide order dated 21.1.2014 the Bench had directed the appellant to make pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed within eight weeks. And, therefore, a similar view ought to be taken in the present application also.

The Bench observed -

“5.1 We find that when the stay petition came up for consideration before this Tribunal on the last occasion on 21.1.2014, this Tribunal after considering the submissions made by both the sides, directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed on the ground that on the earlier decisions, pre-deposit was ordered taking into account the demand for the normal period of time. In the case before us, the entire demand is for the normal period of time. It is a well settled position that while considering various decisions on a matter, the latest decision should be preferred as that would have taken into account all the previous decisions on the subject. Therefore, following our latest order dated 21.1.2014, we direct the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of excise duty confirmed within a period of eight weeks from today. On deposit of the above amount, pre-deposit of the remaining dues is waived and recovery thereof stayed during the pendency of the appeal.”

(See 2014-TIOL-462-CESTAT-MUM)


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Precedents are like old wine

"It is well settled position that...." etc might impress novices. That's about it. Older a precedent, and longer it stands undisturbed, grater its probative value, subject of course to any changes in the statute laws. One cannot find any judicial authority, or support in texts on jurisprudence that latest decisions have to be preferred over older judgments. Precedents have to be applied based on the established principles of law governing the doctrine of precedents, not based on how latest they are. "Latest" might be the politically correct approach in many fields of life, but not necessarily in the administration of justice.

Posted by Gururaj B N
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.