News Update

Has Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
ST - Mobilisation Advance received is adjusted against running bills on which service tax is paid - delay in payment of service tax - pre-deposit ordered of Rs 30 lakhs towards interest: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 11, 2013: THE applicant has filed an application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of Rs.11,55,45,002/-, interest and penalty.

A demand of Rs.4,96,78,270/- is confirmed on the ground that the applicant had undertaken the construction activity of railway sliding and is, therefore, liable to pay service tax as provider of Commercial or Industrial construction.

Another demand of Rs.4,14,14,117/- is confirmed on the ground that the applicant had received mobilization advance in relation to various construction contracts and had not paid the service tax on this amount.

There is also a demand of Rs.2,44,52,615/- confirmed in respect of the amount received from the associated concerns.

Before the Bench it is submitted as under -

+ In applicant's own case, the tribunal vide stay order dated 2.9.2013 in appeal No. ST/133/11 2013-TIOL-1735-CESTAT-MUM, waived the pre-deposit of the dues which were confirmed in respect of construction of railway sliding by observing that Construction work for Railway and Railway siding is specifically excluded from the purview of Construction service inasmuch as ‘siding' is also a part of Railway as per Indian Railway Act, 1989.

+ They had received the advance which has to be paid as per the contracts along with interest and the advance amount is to be adjusted against the running bills; since they had paid service tax on the gross amount of the construction activity which also includes the mobilization advance, therefore the demand is not sustainable.

+ In the matter of amounts received from the associated concerns, they had already paid service tax and in case where the service tax has been paid not on due date, the interest is also paid. In view of this as the amount has already been paid along with interest, therefore the pre-deposit of this amount is waived.

The Revenue representative submitted that in his statement, the Senior Manager, admitted that no service tax has been paid on mobilization advance; that even if the amount of mobilization advance is adjusted in the running bills it would mean that there is a delay in the deposit of service tax regarding this amount; that in the matter of demand of more than Rs.4 crores, the interest will come to approximately Rs.30 lakhs if the amount has been adjusted within six months in the running bills.

The Bench while granting waiver of pre-deposit in respect of ST demand raised in respect of construction of Railway siding in view of its Stay order dated 02/09/2013 also observed that in the matter of ST demanded on the amount received from Associated concerns, the appellant had already paid ST along with interest and, therefore, the pre-deposit of the said demand is also waived.

However, in the matter of ST on mobilization advance, the Bench observed that prima facie there is a delay in payment of Service Tax and, therefore, directed the applicant to make a pre-deposit Rs.30 lakhs for obtaining Stay in the matter.

(See 2013-TIOL-1837-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.