News Update

Cus - Warehousing of imported solar panels/solar modules - Instruction dated 9 th July 2022 appears to travel far beyond the advisory and clarificatory function which stands placed in the Board by virtue of s.151A of CA, hence quashed: HCCus - Petitioner had opted for conversion from a less rigorous procedure of availing Duty Drawback Scheme to a more rigorous procedure under Advance Authorisation Scheme and as per Circular 36/10-Customs, same was not possible: HCCX - Respondents cannot go beyond the Reward Scheme as no discretion is vested with them to release any amount towards the reward, before finalization of the proceedings against assessee: HCGST - Petitioner is given liberty to manually file an appeal against impugned order regarding transitional credit of SGST for which they had valid evidence for payment of VAT of same amount: HCGST - For the period for which return was filed, registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively: HCHas Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
ST - IT service brought under net w.e.f 16/05/2008 - Consequently, activity of testing was also brought into net by amending definition - If software was already included within scope of testing, there was no need for any amendment: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 18, 2013: THE appellants were engaged in providing services relating to testing and analysis of computer software for their clients located in India and abroad during the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2008. However, they did not take any service tax registration nor did they discharge any service tax liability.

Accordingly, two show-cause notices were issued to the appellant, one dated 20/10/2008 demanding service tax of Rs.6,27,69,689/- for the period July 2007 to March 2008 and another notice dated Feb 2008 demanding service tax of Rs.15,12,19,673/- for the period 01/07/2003 to 31/03/2007.

The CCE, Pune-I dropped the demands on the ground that testing IT software was not part of the Technical testing and analysis service until 2008 and the activity of development of IT software itself was excluded from the scope of service tax until 2008 and, therefore, the service tax demand cannot be sustained. Reliance was also placed on the decision in Stag Software Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CST, Bangalore" - (2008-TIOL-375-CESTAT-BANG).

Not ready to let go of such huge demands, the Revenue wanted to test the merits of the order before the CESTAT.

The grounds taken by the Revenue are as follows.

+ The apex Court in the case of TCS Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, - (2004-TIOL-87-SC-CT-LB) has held that "software" is goods for the purpose of levy of sales tax.

+ The CBEC vide Circular No.81/2/2005-ST dated 07/10/2005 clarified that maintenance or repair of software is leviable to service tax under the maintenance or repair service. Therefore, testing of software, being goods, would come within the purview of technical testing and analysis with effect from 01/07/2003 onwards.

+ The reliance placed by the adjudicating authority on the decision in Stag Software Pvt. Ltd. is not correct as the Tribunal in that case committed an error in interpreting the judgement of the apex Court in the case of TCS by holding that only canned software can be goods.

The respondent submitted that testing of IT software was made specifically taxable from 16/05/2008 under the category of "Technical testing and analysis service" and, therefore, prior to that date the said activity was not leviable to service tax. Reliance is also placed on the decision in the case of Stag Software Pvt. Ltd." and Relq Software Pvt. Ltd., Vs. CST, Bangalore, - (2008-TIOL-2573-CESTAT-BANG) which was upheld by the Karnataka High Court and it is prayed that the Revenue appeal be dismissed.

The Bench observed –

"5.1 Prior to 16/05/2005 Section 65(106) of Finance Act, 1994 defined technical testing and analysis as follows:

"Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical, biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or any immovable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals.

The said definition was amended in the Finance Act, 2008 and the amended definition reads as follows:

"Technical testing and analysis means any service in relation to physical, chemical, biological or any other scientific testing or analysis of goods or material or information technology software or any immoveable property but does not include any testing or analysis service provided in relation to the human beings or animals".

5. Information technology service was brought under the service tax net with effect from 16/07/2008. Consequently, the activity of testing and analysis of IT software was also brought into the tax net by amending the definition. If IT software was already included within the scope of technical testing and analysis service, there was no need for any amendment to be specifically made in Section 65(106). In the budget instructions issued vide letter 334/1/2008-TRU dated 29/02/2008, in para 4 thereof, it has been specifically stated that service provided in relation to information technology (IT) software for use in the course or furtherance, of business or commerce has been specifically included in the list of taxable service vide Section 65 (105) (zzzze). In para 4.1.7, it has been stated that following consequential amendments in other taxable services are also being made, namely, to include testing and analysis of IT software services under technical testing and analysis service (Section 65(105) (zzh). Similar amendments were made in the scope of business auxiliary service, technical inspection and certification service, management, maintenance or repair of properties, consulting engineer's service, etc. to bring activities relating to IT software in the tax net in the aforesaid categories. This Tribunal in the case of Relq Software Pvt. Ltd. (cited supra) had also held that testing and analysis of IT software would be effective only from 16/05/2008 when the said activity was specifically included under technical testing and analysis service. The said decision of the Tribunal was also upheld by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the same case cited supra."

Holding that testing and analysis of IT software would be leviable to service tax only with effect from 16/05/2008 and, therefore, there is no infirmity in the order passed by the adjudicating authority" the Revenue appeal was dismissed as being devoid of merits.

(See 2013-TIOL-1541-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.