News Update

Cus - Warehousing of imported solar panels/solar modules - Instruction dated 9 th July 2022 appears to travel far beyond the advisory and clarificatory function which stands placed in the Board by virtue of s.151A of CA, hence quashed: HCCus - Petitioner had opted for conversion from a less rigorous procedure of availing Duty Drawback Scheme to a more rigorous procedure under Advance Authorisation Scheme and as per Circular 36/10-Customs, same was not possible: HCCX - Respondents cannot go beyond the Reward Scheme as no discretion is vested with them to release any amount towards the reward, before finalization of the proceedings against assessee: HCGST - Petitioner is given liberty to manually file an appeal against impugned order regarding transitional credit of SGST for which they had valid evidence for payment of VAT of same amount: HCGST - For the period for which return was filed, registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively: HCHas Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
Mumbai Service Tax Audit detects & Emirates Airlines quickly pays Rs 175 Crore; Saudi Airlines earlier paid Rs 130 Cr

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, OCT 12, 2013: SOME experts recently said that service tax is a 'lapse-friendly' tax, which needs intelligent study for flawless compliance. No matter how big a commercial enterprise is and there may be dozens of taxation personnel handling this tricky levy, something is likely to go amiss. And this is what was detected by the Audit Team of the Mumbai Service Tax Commissionerate in the case of highly reputed Emirates Airlines. As per the detection records, the Airlines completely missed to pay tax to the tune of Rs 175 Crore and once the same being pointed out, they promptly deposited the same in the Government's account.

As per the Press Release issued by the Commissioner, Mr Sushil Solanki, their audit team recently studied the books of the airlines and found that they have not paid service tax for the passenger who embarked from different airports in India for destination in foreign country. As per the law, there is no dispute about payment of service tax on such journey.

On verification of record, it was noticed that they did not pay the service tax on the said journey. The differential service tax along with interest for the period 2008-2013 works out to more than Rs.175 crores. On realizing their mistake as pointed out by the officer, they paid Rs.175 crores as service tax on 10.10.2013.

Regarding the rate of interest, department is of the view that they should have paid @ 24% in terms of Section 73B of the Finance Act. Department is verifying the similar aspect from other airlines also.

Service Tax-I department has recently detected major cases of other airlines also. Like in the case of Saudi Arabia, they have also paid more than Rs.130 crores in the month of March- April 2013 on account of non-payment of service tax for Haj passengers. Department is also closely watching the defaulters who had not paid their monthly dues in time and have been attaching their Bank Accounts .


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.