News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
I-T - Whether income derived from airconditioning and other charges of let out property can be considered as income from other sources entitled for deduction of expenses u/s 57 - YES: ITAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, SEPT 27, 2013: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether income derived from the airconditioning and other charges of the let out property can be considered as income from other sources entitled for deduction of expenses u/s 57. And the answer goes in favour of the assessee.

Facts of the case

The
assessee had received rent of Rs. 45,00,049/- from letting. The Assessee had also received a sum of Rs. 66,25,957/- on account of air conditioning, electricity and water charges. The assessee had declared the rental income under the head "income from house property" and the air conditioning and other charges had been declared as income from other sources against which property maintenance expenses of Rs. 82,54,091/- had been claimed resulting into net loss of Rs. 20,28,134/- under the head " income from other sources". The AO held that since the assessee had let out the property on rent alongwith air conditioning and other services the entire income should be assessed as income from house property. The AO disallowed the deduction claimed on account of property maintenance charges on the ground that the same was not allowable as deduction under the head "income from house property. The CIT (A) held that these charges cannot be split up and confirmed the order of AO.

On Appeal before the Tribunal the AR submitted that income from house property was assessable only in respect of bonafide annual value of land and building and not in respect of services if any provided by the landlord. The DR relied on the Judgment of Apex Court in case of Shambhu Investment Pvt Ltd.

Having heard the parties, the Tribunal held that,

++ the income tax under the head "income from house property" is required to be charged on the bonafide annual letting value of land and building. In case the landlord in addition to letting out the building has also provided some services, the income from such services has to be assessed as income from business or income from other sources depending upon the nature of services rendered;

++ income from air conditioning and other charges has to be assessed as income from other sources. While computing the income from other sources the assessee will be entitled for deduction of expenses u/s 57. This aspect of allowability of expenses u/s 57 is required to be examined at the level of AO.

(See 2013-TIOL-832-ITAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.