News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
ST - Laying of optical fibre cables for BSNL and other telecom service providers - Not taxable - Prima facie case made out - Pre-deposit waived: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

BANGALORE, SEPT 25, 2013: THIS stay petition is filed for waiver of predeposit of an amount of Rs.90,70,559/- confirmed as service tax liability, interest thereof and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act 1994 on the ground that the appellant has not discharged service tax liability under the category of “erection, commissioning or installation services” when they have rendered the service of laying of optical fibre cables for BSNL and other telecom service providers.

Counsel submits that Board vide Circular No. 123/5/2010-TRU dated 24/5/2010 has specifically at Sl. No. 2 clarified that the activity of laying of cables is not a taxable service under sub-section (105) of Section 65 of the Finance Act 1994. He would also rely upon the decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Bhopal Vs. Sanjeev Kumar Jain [ 2013-TIOL-833-CESTAT-DEL ] and Nicco Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service tax, Kolkata [ 2012-TIOL-190-CESTAT-KOL ].

Tribunal held.

It is not in dispute that the appellant is laying optical fibre cables for BSNL and other telecom service providers. The appellant has claimed that this activity does not amount to rendering of any service. CBEC Circular dated 24/5/2010 clarifies the issue which is in favour of the assessee. On considering the circular, this Tribunal in the case of Nicco Corporation Ltd. and in the case of Sanjeev Kumar Jain have taken a view which is in favour of the assessee. The appellant has made out a strong prima facie case for waiver of the predeposit of the amount involved. Application for waiver of predeposit of the amount involved is allowed and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

(See 2013-TIOL-1414-CESTAT-BANG)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.