News Update

Correction in challan attributes in respect of IDS, 2016 payments - reg32 officers to receive awards on Central Excise Day tomorrowSuman Saxena takes over as full fledged member of Bankruptcy BoardCabinet makes way for mega solar power projects with 40,000 MW capacityAfghani national caught with endangered corals speciesCabinet gives nod to India Poland Agreement on agricultural co-operationIT Ministry launches Cyber Swachhta KendraGovt's limitation in demonetization analytics should rekindle tax reformsCentral Excise - CESTAT cannot reduce mandatory penalty: Supreme CourtI-T - No additions warranted on gross value of cash deposits which represents turnover, if it did not breach profit limit prescribed u/s 44ADST -Collection of data on consumption of electricity by MSEDCL customers by taking photos of meter reading for generation of bills is taxable under BAS: CESTATCash deposit post demon(etisation) - CBDT guidelines for AO'sCBI arrests three Central Excise officials in graft caseITAT Vice President G D Agrawal gets officiating charge of PresidentUplift of 'Digital Payments' - more than INR 150 crore distributed as 'reward'Govt notifies all provisions of protocol amending India Israel DTAA (See 'DTAA' in 'TII')Anti Dumping - Writ Petition against final findings of Designated Authority: High Court was not justified in exercising its writ jurisdiction: SCCivil Services Day - PM Awards to be given today90K more affordable houses sanctioned for urban poorIndia offers tech knowhow to ASEAN in telecom sectorRestricting doubly exempt Corpus DonationST - Tribunal is barred from rendering finding or recording an order on matter in which appellant has not placed itself within Tribunal's appellate jurisdiction: CESTATI-T - No penalty is leviable, if basis of addition itself ceases to survive: ITATCX - SSI notfn. 8/2001 - Intent to take advantage of recognition enjoyed by another brand is critical to invoking of exception provision: CESTATCBEC grants Sec 11C benefit on services provided by Common Effluent Treatment Plant for period 2012 to 2015ACC promotes 292 CBDT officers as Principal CITAppointment of Special Public Prosecutors for income tax cases - JS-level officer from Ministry of Law to join screening panel for metrosCBI books senior IAS officer in graft caseIndia keen to give fillip to relations with African countries: AnsariHome buyers' complaint - SC toughens stand against Unitech; directs to deposit interest within 8 weeksFICN worth about Rs one crore seized on Indo-Bangla borderKalindi Express rams into goods train at Tundla StationChange in rate of tax vs. Change in effective rate of taxI-T - Rent earned by assessee engaged in business of leasing properties, will be taxable as 'business profits': ITATST - 'gross amount charged', is not an isolated phrase but to be read in conjunction with expression 'for such service provided': CESTATCX - Merely because Autolite India Ltd is a group company, appellant cannot use its brand name and claim SSI benefit: CESTAT
 
CX - Notfn 11/97 amending Notfn. 67/95 for exemption to intermediate products used in manufacture of goods supplied under exemption to Intl Organization as per Notfn. 108/95 is to be considered clarificatory in nature - Appeal allowed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI , SEPT 20, 2013 : NOTIFICATION No. 108/95-CE dated 28.8.95 exempted all goods falling under the Schedule to the CETA, 1985 when supplied for the official use of United Nations or International Organisation or for the projects funded by United Nations or an International Organization and approved by the Govt. of India.

Rule 57C of the CER, 1944 prevailing during February 1997 provided for disallowance of Modvat credit when final product was exempted from duty. However, exception was made in respect of supplies made in terms of Notification No. 108/95-CE dated 28.8.95. The appellants were, therefore, entitled for Modvat credit of duty paid on the components used in the manufacture of motor vehicles supplied to United Nations or International Organizations.However, the captive consumption NotificationNo.67/95-CE dated 16.3.95 did not mention about clearances of the final product to the International Organization, whom the appellants were supplying.

Nonetheless, an amendment came by virtue of Notification No.11/97-CE, dated 01.03.1997 including these International Organizations.

In the present case, the period involved is of February, 1997 and the Department demanded the duty on the intermediate products utilized in the final products cleared under exemption 108/95-CE. The lower authorities confirmed the demand.

Before the CESTAT, it is submitted that the subsequent amendment is to be given effect retrospectively even for the month of February 97 also inasmuch as the situation of Revenue neutral; that the Notification No. 11/97-CEdt. 1.3.97 is clarificatory in nature to the Notification No. 108/95 dt. 28.8.1995. Reliance is placed on the decision in Premier Tyres Ltd.( 2003-TIOL-55-HC-KERALA-CX ) .

The Revenue representative reiterated the order passed by the lower authority and submitted that the Notification No. 11/97-CE cannot be given retrospective effect and, therefore,the appeal should be dismissed.

The Bench observed -

"7. Considering the submissions made by both sides and after examining the issue before us. We find that as per Rule 57C, the credit of duty was not allowed if final products are exempted but which reproduced hear as under:

“Rule 57C. Credit of duty not to be allowed if final products are exempt.- No credit of the specified duty paid on the inputs used [in the manufacture of a final product (other than those cleared either to a unit in a Free Trade Zone or to a hundred percent Export-Oriented Unit)] [ or unit in an Electronic Hardware technology Park or to a unit in Software Technology Parks] [or supplied to the United Nations or an international organization for their official use or supplied to projects funded by them, on which exemption of duty is available under notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) NO. 108/95-Central Excise, dated the 28 th August, 1995] shall be allowed if the final product is exempt from the whole of the duty excise leviable thereon or is chargeable to nil rate of duty”.

We further find that as per Notification No. 108/95-CE dt. 28.8.95 the goods were exempted which were supplied to the United Nations or an international organization for their official use. We further find that as there was an anomaly in the Rule to plug that anomaly Notification NO. 11/97-Ce dated 1.3.1997 came into effect…….In the case in hand before us, also the parts assemblies to the motor vehicle which is the final product supplied to unit. Therefore, the intermediate product of the parts assembled, the benefit of Notification No. 67/1995 read with Notification NO. 108/95 is available to the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with consequential relief if any."

In passing : Through every rift of discovery some seemingly anomaly drops out of the darkness, and falls, as a golden link, into the great chain of order - Edwin Hubbel Chapin.

(See 2013-TIOL-1391-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS