News Update

Cus - Warehousing of imported solar panels/solar modules - Instruction dated 9 th July 2022 appears to travel far beyond the advisory and clarificatory function which stands placed in the Board by virtue of s.151A of CA, hence quashed: HCCus - Petitioner had opted for conversion from a less rigorous procedure of availing Duty Drawback Scheme to a more rigorous procedure under Advance Authorisation Scheme and as per Circular 36/10-Customs, same was not possible: HCCX - Respondents cannot go beyond the Reward Scheme as no discretion is vested with them to release any amount towards the reward, before finalization of the proceedings against assessee: HCGST - Petitioner is given liberty to manually file an appeal against impugned order regarding transitional credit of SGST for which they had valid evidence for payment of VAT of same amount: HCGST - For the period for which return was filed, registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively: HCHas Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
ST - BAS - appellant receives commission as GSA from foreign airlines for marketing products - since same is received in forex and airlines do not have any PE in India services have to be treated as export of service in terms of Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules - stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 29, 2013: THE appellant are an International Air Transport Association (IATA) agent and also they are General Sale Agent (GSA) for foreign airlines namely HANNAIR, S.N. Brussels and Iceland Airlines. While acting as IATA agent, they provide the service of issuing air tickets to passengers for which they receive commission and on this commission they are paying the service tax. Beside this, they also receive 3% commission from the Airlines in respect of the ticket sold on flown basis, in their capacity as their General Sales agents (GSA).

The dispute in this case is as to whether the appellant are liable to pay service tax on the 3% commission received by them from the airlines - HANNAIR, S.N. Brussels and Iceland Airlines. There is no dispute that these airlines do not have any office or establishment in India.

The department has taken a view that these services have been provided by the appellant to the airlines mentioned above and have been delivered in India, the same would be taxable and that the same cannot be treated as export of service even though the commission is received by the appellant from the foreign airlines in convertible foreign currency.

The Additional Commissioner confirmed the service tax demand of Rs. 14,91,248/- along with penalties and interest and this order was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals).

So, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

It is submitted that the service provided by the appellant is BAS taxable u/s 65(105) (zzb) r/w s 65(19) of the FA, 1994 and in terms of the provisions of Rule 3 of Export of Service Rules, the services have to be treated as export of service as these services have been received by the foreign airlines located abroad and have been used by them in their business. Reliance is placed on the decision in Paul Merchants Ltd. - (2012-TIOL-1877-CESTAT-DEL) and it is submitted that the appellant have a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit.

The Revenue representative submitted that the majority decision in the cited case has not been accepted by the department and an appeal has been filed against the same and in these circumstances for safeguarding the interests of the Revenue waiver of pre-deposit cannot be granted.

The Bench observed -

"6. The only point of dispute in this case is in respect of taxability of the commission which the appellant receive as GSA from the foreign airlines whom they represent in India and whose products are being marketed by them. There is also no dispute that the commission is being received in convertible foreign currency and that the airlines do not have any office or establishment in India. Prima facie we are of the view that the issue involved in this case is covered by the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Paul Merchants Ltd. (supra) and accordingly the services being provided by the appellant to the foreign airlines have to be treated as export of service in terms of Rule 3 of the Export of Service Rules. Therefore, the appellant have a strong prima facie case and, hence, the requirement of pre-deposit is waived for hearing of the appeal and recovery thereof is stayed till the disposal of the appeal…."

In fine, the stay application was allowed.

(See 2013-TIOL-980-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.