News Update

Cus - Warehousing of imported solar panels/solar modules - Instruction dated 9 th July 2022 appears to travel far beyond the advisory and clarificatory function which stands placed in the Board by virtue of s.151A of CA, hence quashed: HCCus - Petitioner had opted for conversion from a less rigorous procedure of availing Duty Drawback Scheme to a more rigorous procedure under Advance Authorisation Scheme and as per Circular 36/10-Customs, same was not possible: HCCX - Respondents cannot go beyond the Reward Scheme as no discretion is vested with them to release any amount towards the reward, before finalization of the proceedings against assessee: HCGST - Petitioner is given liberty to manually file an appeal against impugned order regarding transitional credit of SGST for which they had valid evidence for payment of VAT of same amount: HCGST - For the period for which return was filed, registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively: HCHas Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
ST - Packaging Services - as per Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985, packaging is statutory requirement - activity of packaging would form integral part of manufacturing and cannot be viewed as a service - Stay granted: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, JUNE 28, 2013: THE appellants are engaged in providing packaging activity services in relation to fertilizer manufactured by M/s. Zuari Industries Ltd., Goa, for which they received consideration.

The department was of the view that the activity undertaken by the appellant would come within the purview of "packaging services" as defined in Section 65 (76b) of the Finance Act, 1994 and, therefore, the appellant was issued a SCN demanding service tax of Rs.3,20,47,239/- for the period 16/06/2005 to 31/03/2010.

Such a large amount of demand met with confirmation at the hands of the CCE, Goa along with interest and penalty.

So, the agency is before the CESTAT with a Stay application & appeal.

Following are the submissions made -

++ the Fertiliser Control Order, 1985 (FCO) governs the transaction relating to manufacture, sale and distribution of fertilizers and as per clause 19 of the said Order, there are restrictions on manufacture, sale and distribution of the fertilizers which read as follows. "No person shall himself or by any other person on his behalf sell, offer for sale, stock or exhibit for sale or distribute (i) any fertilizer the container whereof is not packed and marked in the manner laid down in this order; (ii) any fertilizer the label or container where bears the name of any individual firm or company purporting to be manufacturer of the fertilizer, which individual, firm or company is fictitious or does not exist". Further as per Clause 21, the requirement with regard to the packing and marketing are enumerated apart from the weight and size of the package. Thus, the packing of fertilizer is a statutory activity under the Fertilizer Control Order, without which the fertilizer cannot be marketed.

++ Section 2(f) of the CEA, 1944 defines "manufacture" to include any process, incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product. The manufacture of fertilizer is complete only when the packaging is done. The definition of packaging activity in 65(76b) of the Finance Act, 1994, therefore, excludes packaging of fertilizer since the said section excludes any activity which amounts to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the CEA, 1944.

+ Reliance is placed on the following decisions to substantiate their contention viz. Afco Industrial & Chemicals Ltd. 1987 (32) ELT 220 (Tribunal); Flex Engineering Ltd., Vs. CCE, UP, - (2012-TIOL-01-SC-CX) & Prem Conductor - (2007-TIOL-2258-CESTAT-MUM)

The Revenue representative submitted that the manufacture of fertilizer is complete even before they are packed and even after packaging, fertilizer remains fertilizer and therefore, the process of the packaging undertaken in the instant case will not come within the purview of "manufacture" as defined in Section 2(f) of the CEA, 1944.

The Bench observed -

"5.1 From the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985, it is clear that the fertilizer cannot be marketed without packaging, in the manner specified under the said order and thus packaging of fertilizer is a statutory requirement. If that be so, marketing of fertilizer cannot be take place without packaging. Under Section 2(f)(i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, "manufacture" includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product. Thus the completion of fertilizer as a manufactured product would be over only when the packaging is completed. Without packaging, fertilizer cannot be marketed. Therefore, there is merit in the contention of the appellant that the activity of packaging undertaken in respect of fertilizer would form an integral part of the manufacturing activity and cannot be viewed as a service activity, especially in the context of the packaging activity as defined in Section 65 (76b) which excludes form its scope any activity of manufacture as defined in Section 2 (f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Thus, the appellant has made out a strong case in their favour against pre-deposit of the dues adjudged."

In fine, the Bench granted unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of dues adjudged and stayed recovery.

In passing: Fertile minds…fertile imagination…fertile ideas…growth…

(See 2013-TIOL-975-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.