News Update

Israel-Iran War: A close shave for Global Economy but for how long?I-T - If income from stock-in-trade are held as investments, then provisions of section 14A would apply to such income: ITATTRAI recommends on Infra Sharing, Spectrum Sharing & Spectrum LeasingI-T- Revisionary powers u/s 263 can't be exercised when AO has neither assumed facts incorrectly nor there is incorrect application of law : ITATTechnology Board okays funding of Dhruva Space's Solar Array ProjectI-T- Issue of interest is debatable issue on which two views are possible and AO accepted one of views for which PCIT cannot assume revisional jurisdiction: ITATHealth Secy visits Bilthoven Biologicals, discusses production of Polio VaccineI-T - Estimation of profit element from purchases should be done reasonably if assessee could not conclusively prove that purchases made are from parties as claimed, in absence of confirmations from them: ITATStudy finds Coca-Cola accounts for 11% of branded plastic pollution worldwideI-T- Triplex flats purchased are interconnected and can be considered as 'a residential unit'' as per definition of section 54F of Act : ITATDelhi HC says conspiracy against PM is a crime against StateI-T- AO omitted to probe issue of cash payments made over specified limit; revisionary power u/s 263 is rightly exercised: ITATBrazil makes new rules to streamline consumption taxesI-T-Power of revision unnecessarily exercised where AO had no scope to examine creditworthiness & genuineness of assessee's creditors: ITATBiden signs rules mandating airlines to give automatic refunds for delayed or cancelled flightsI-T-As per settled law, in absence of enabling powers, no disallowance can be made : ITATBYD trying to redefine luxury for new EV variantsGST - On the one hand, the order states registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively and on the other hand mentions that there are no dues - Order modified: HCIsrael finally moving ahead with Rafah OperationsGST - Registration cancelled retrospectively on ground that physical verification revealed that the firm was non-existent - Petitioner had informed that they shifted business and had sought cancellation of registration - Order cancelling registration modified: HCNorway oil major boss says Europeans are not hard-working as compared to AmericansGST - Since registration was cancelled, petitioner could not access portal and view the SCNs and file replies - Order set aside and matter remitted: HCJio turns world’s top telco in terms of data trafficGST - Reply filed is a detailed one and if the proper officer was of the view that the same was unsatisfactory, he should have specifically sought further details - Matter is remitted: HCGadkari faints during campaign; Heat takes toll on his healthGST - SCN does not put petitioner to notice that the registration is liable to be cancelled retrospectively - Order set aside and registration restored: HCSC asks EC to submit more info on reliability of EVMsGST - Non-application of mind - Proper officer has merely observed that the reply filed is unclear and unsatisfactory and, therefore, the demand is confirmed - Matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCItaly imposes USD 10 mn fine on Amazon for unfair business practicesCommercial Tax - Judgment of High Court is in jeopardy once appeal is entertained by Supreme Court - Appeals shall remain pending before the Appellate Board, Bench at Indore, till the issue is decided by Apex Court: HCUS warns Pak of punitive sanctions against trade deal with IranST - As the job-work undertaken by appellant amounts to manufacture, service tax cannot be levied on them under both Heads 'Business Auxiliary Service' and 'Business Support Service': CESTATRight to Sleep - A Legal lullabyCX - Existence of corroborative evidence is essential in order to establish clandestine removal of goods and same cannot be merely based on assumptions and presumptions: CESTAT
 
Why CBEC is adamant on e-filing of ST3 returns?

MAY 14, 2013

By V Unnikrishnan

AS we know, the e-filing of ST3 returns have become a matter of serious concern for all service tax assesses, after the introduction of negative list from 1 st July, 2012. Of course, it was not a smooth/user friendly scenario ever since its introduction from 1 st April, 2010. Initially, it was made compulsory for all assessees who pay service tax above 10 lakhs tax/CENVAT from April, 2010. From 1st October 2011, e-filing has been made compulsory for ALL service tax assesses, without proper evaluation/assessment of the success of the scheme, started in April, 2010.

The compulsory e-filing was made in a hasty manner; it should have been made optional for some more time.  The changes in the software were all along in experimental stage. The change over from SERMON to ACES also was simultaneous. However, the things went beyond control after the introduction of negative list from 1st July, 2012. After giving extensions for the filing date, finally ST3 return for the period 1st July to September 2012 were filed by almost all assessees on 30th April, 2013.

As per the details given in the CBEC website, http://www.servicetax.gov.in/st-proc-home.htm.

"Para 8.2. The ST-3 Returns can also be got prepared and filed through the ‘Service Tax Return Preparers' (STRPs) who have been duly accredited and authorized by the Department. The Board has issued relevant provisions and guidelines in regard of Service tax Return Preparer Scheme vide Notification No.07/2009-ST dated 03.02.2009 as amended. Currently, there are 1477 STRPs functioning at various locations spread out all across the country. The service tax assesses can log on to  www trpscheme.com. to know the details of the STRPs available in their area."

This is too insufficient to cater the 17 lakh assessees. Thus, the large chunk of assesses find it difficult to avail the services of the STRPs etc. for this work, as they are otherwise busy with their professional work.

Admittedly, the serious matter directly affecting more than 17 lakh service tax assesses was handled in a casual manner by the Authorities in charge of Computerisation in the CBEC. The NIC was initially providing the requisite support service for the Computerisation project with their software SERMON. The NIC officers posted in each Commissionerate had done yeomen services in improvising the software with modification suggested by the field level officers. However, in 2010, all of a sudden, it was discontinued and different agencies were appointed like, HP for the hard ware supply, TCS for data management and Wipro for the software development. Thus the new ACES was brought in which has not been able to sort out the software problems.

It reached the pitiable plight that the Hon'ble FM had to concede in his Budget speech about the miserable state of affairs. FM has admitted the strange statistics that in service tax matters, out of 17 lakh assesses only 7 lakhs are filing returns as per law. The Hon'ble FM has further   stated - "Many have simply stopped filing the returns. We cannot go after each of them. I have to motivate them to file the returns and pay the tax dues". (Is it not an open confession that the dept. has miserably failed in the enforcement of the tax law all these years!!). Announcing a new scheme for Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013,  the Hon'ble FM has stated- ,"I hope to entice a large number of assesses to return to the tax fold. I also hope to collect a reasonable sum of money".

Though the response for this clarion call is to be awaited, the CBEC has hijacked the defects of the software development in the ACES in a different direction .

It was only prudent on the part of the authorities concerned to allow the assessees to file their ST3 returns manually, before the due dates prescribed. Instead, they extended the due date for filing, anticipating that the problems in the software in e-filing can be sorted out successfully. It has never been able to do so, as is evident by now. The latest orders extending/re-fixing the due date for filing ST3 returns for Oct, 2012  to March, 2013 till 31 st August, 2013,  reads as follows:-

"F.No.137/99/2011-Service Tax dated the 23 rd  April, 2013

Order No: 03/2013-Service Tax..

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule(4) of rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the Central Board of Excise & Customs hereby extends the date of submission of the  Form ST-3, for the period from 1st October 2012 to 31st  March 2013, from 25th  April, 2013 to  31st  August, 2013.

The circumstances of a special nature, which have given rise to this extension of time, are as follows:  

"The Form ST-3, for the period from 1st  October 2012 to 31st  March 2013, is expected to be available on ACES around 31st  of July, 2013".

It may be noted that the CBEC is hopeful to make available the ST3 format on ACES by 31 st July, 2013 only. In other words, the CBEC will be taking another TWO more months for this job to make available the ST3 format for the period expired on 31 st March, 2013!!

In this background of affairs, why the CBEC should be so adamant on the compulsory e-filing of the ST3 returns as per rule 7(3) of STRs, 1994? Rather, the manual filing could have been allowed before the due date was duly extended; the data entry work from these returns could have been done in the revised ST3 format by the departmental officers or out sourced agencies (as being done by CBDT). This would have also helped in developing a hassle free, user friendly software for the e–filing of ST3 returns in future. Even now this could be attempted by the authorities concerned, instead of putting the 17 lakh assessees in trouble till 31st Aug, 2013. Simple formats for different type of assessees, like tax fully paid in cash and no CENVAT, those availing CENVAT; having exports etc. could be considered on the lines of different ITR formats being followed by CBDT.

At any rate, it should be made OPTIONAL to choose the manual or e-filing as is made available by the CBDT all these years and even now the e-filing is optional to the "Income tax assesses upto 5 lakh income group". The feasibility of different formats for those who pay the whole tax by cash; those avail CENVAT, those who have exports etc can very well be considered.

Problems can crop up in software developing, still, the number of adversely affected persons should always be ensured to the minimum and if possible, only the departmental persons should be subjected to the ordeal. The CBEC authorities should see to it that the assessees shall never be harassed like this for filing their returns any longer.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

(DISCLAIMER : The views expressed are strictly of the author and Taxindiaonline.com doesn't necessarily subscribe to the same. Taxindiaonline.com Pvt. Ltd. is not responsible or liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any interpretation, error, omission in the articles being hosted on the site. )

 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: adamency of cbec for e filing of st 3

well thought article sir. really cbec should
allow manual retuns who wish to file nil returns,who dont want to avail any exemption and cenvat credit.company assessees should be given different named returns and different last dates. march return should always be allowed to be filed by 30 june.


Posted by Navin Khandelwal
 

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.