News Update

India received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper officer has not applied his mind while passing the order; confirmed demand by opining that reply is not satisfactory - Proper Officer is directed to withdraw all punitive actions taken against petitioner pursuant to impugned order: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HCGST - Cancellation of registration for non-filing of returns - Suspension/revocation of license would be counterproductive and works against the interest of revenue - Pragmatic view needs to be taken to permit petitioner to carry on his business: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsI-T- AO not barred from issuing more than one SCN; Fresh SCN seeking information is not without jurisdiction, more so where HC itself directed re-doing of assessment: HCMurthy launches Capacity Building on Design and Entrepreneurship programCash, liquor & drugs worth Rs 110 Cr seized from Jharkhand ahead of pollsI-T- Appeal before CIT(A) (NFAC) is rightly dismissed where it has been delayed by over one year without just & reasonable cause: ITATPoll-induced stress: 2 Bihar officials die of heart attack at polling boothsSixth Edition of Commandants' Conclave held in PuneSome Gujarat villages keep away from polls over unfulfilled demands from governmentRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulatorUS cancels licence to some firms found exporting materials to Huawei
 
Whether for purpose of transfer of a case u/s 127(2), mere mention of reason 'for effective and coordinated investigation' is neither vague nor insufficient - YES: HC

By TIOL News Service

AHMEDABAD, FEB 22, 2013: THE issue before the Bench is - Whether for the purpose of transfer of a case u/s 127(2), the mere mention of the reason ''for effective and coordinated investigation' by the Revenue in the Show Cause Notice is neither vague nor insufficient.

The assessees were members of the same family/group companies. Search operations were carried out by the income tax authorities at their premises. Assessment proceedings arising out of such search were pending before the respective AO who were all authorities situated at Bhavnagar. The CIT, Ahmedabad passed an order u/s 127(2) transferring such pending assessments from Bhavnagar to Ahmedabad. Such orders were challenged by the petitioners before this Court. Such petitions were disposed on the assurance of the Revenue that CIT shall withdraw such order. The CIT transferred all the cases to Assistant CIT, Ahmedabad.

In a peition before the HC, the Assessee's Counsel submitted that the reason indicated in the show cause notice for transferring of the cases namely, “for effective and coordinated investigation” is too vague and general. In any case, such reason was not sufficient permitting the department to transfer the cases. The Counsel lastly submitted that none of the assessees were assessed at Ahmedabad. The Revenue's Counsel submitted that all the requirements for exercise of power u/s 127(2) as interpreted by various Courts were fully complied with.

Having heard the parties, the HC held that,

++ unless the reasons which prompted the competent authority to transfer the case can be stated to be wholly irrelevant or arbitrary, the Court would not interfere with such reasons. Of course an order of such nature can and need to be quashed if it is demonstrated that same is passed either without jurisdiction or is actuated by mala fide either in fact or in law;

++ reason for transfer was clearly indicated in the show cause notice namely, for centralisation of cases and for effective and coordinated investigation. The Assessee has no right in law to insist that his case be kept out of consideration of such branch. The reason “for effective and co-ordinate investigation” for transfer of assessment cases is neither vague or ground not insufficient.

(See 2013-TIOL-140-HC-AHM-IT)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.