News Update

GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate imagesEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; JaishankarAstronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkGovt hosts workshop on improving Ease of Doing Business in Mining sectorI-T - Anything made taxable by rule-making authority u/s 17(2)(viii) should be 'perquisite' in form of 'fringe benefits or amenity': SCCus - Drawback - Revenue contends that appeal of exporter ought to have been dismissed by Tribunal as not maintainable since correct remedy was filing a revision application with Central government - Appeal disposed of: HCCus - CHA - AA has clearly brought out the modus adopted by the appellant and how he was a party to the entire under valuation exercise - Factual finding affirmed by Tribunal - No question of law arises for consideration: HCGST - Proper Officer had to at least consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion - Non-application of mind - Order set aside and matter remitted for re-adjudication: HC86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveTax Refund Conundrum - Odyssey of Legal MisstepsRoof-hugging inflation nudges Argentina to print first lot of 10,000 notes of pesoInvestigation finds presence of ‘boys club’ strands of culture at American bank regulator
 
ST - Appellants are manufacturer of country liquor under brand name Pahili Dhar, registered in their name and are in agreement with Talreja Trade for marketing - it cannot be said that appellant are job workers for Talreja as they are selling agents - they are not liable to pay ST: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, FEB 12, 2013: THE appellants are manufacturers of sugar and denatured spirit/denatured ethanol. The appellants are manufacturing country liquor under the registered brand name of "Pahili Dhar"and are having an agreement with M/s. Talreja Trade (HUF) for marketing of the said country liquor. M/s. Talreja Trade (HUF) is also supplying the essence and packing materials for manufacturing of country liquor to the appellants.

The revenue is of the view that the raw material is being supplied by M/s. Talreja Trade (HUF) to the appellant and the appellants are job workers for Talreja Trade. Therefore, the appellants are liable to pay service tax under the category of "Business Auxiliary Service".

Since the demand of Rs. 2,26,147/- along with interest and various penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 was confirmed by the lower authorities, the appellant is before the CESTAT.

The Bench observed -

"5. After considering the submissions made by both sides and going through the records, we find that the appellants are the manufacturer of country liquor under the brand name ”Pahili Dhar"which is a registered trade name of the appellant themselves. The appellants are having the agreement with M/s. Talreja Trade (HUF) for marketing this liquor. Therefore, it cannot be said that the appellant are the job workers for Talreja Trade as they are the selling agents of the appellants. With these observations, we find that the appellant are not liable to pay service tax under "Business Auxiliary Service"on the above mentioned activity. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any."

In passing: Incidentally, there is another service tax demand of Rs.38.39 lakhs raised and confirmed by the CCE, Pune-II in the year 2008 & in respect of the same appellant for the same agreement with M/s Talreja Trade (HUF) and in appeal the CESTAT had granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit. We had reported this order as (2009-TIOL-1029-CESTAT-MUM). Interestingly, in that case the Revenue allegation was that since the applicants have allowed M/s Talreja Trade (HUF) to use their brand name "Pahili Dhar" in selling the products, they are liable to pay Service Tax under the category "Intellectual Property Services".

The Bench had while granting stay observed -

"5. After considering the arguments made by both the parties and perused the records, we find that nowhere the Department has made out that M/s Talreja Trade is using the brand name of the applicants for their products. We also find that the applicants are having a good prima facie case in their favour. In view of the above, we grant complete waiver of pre-deposit of entire service tax and penalties till final disposal of the appeal."

This order does not find a mention in the present proceedings.

I have taken more good from alcohol than alcohol has taken from me - Winston Churchill.

(See 2013-TIOL-263-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.