News Update

Cus - Warehousing of imported solar panels/solar modules - Instruction dated 9 th July 2022 appears to travel far beyond the advisory and clarificatory function which stands placed in the Board by virtue of s.151A of CA, hence quashed: HCCus - Petitioner had opted for conversion from a less rigorous procedure of availing Duty Drawback Scheme to a more rigorous procedure under Advance Authorisation Scheme and as per Circular 36/10-Customs, same was not possible: HCCX - Respondents cannot go beyond the Reward Scheme as no discretion is vested with them to release any amount towards the reward, before finalization of the proceedings against assessee: HCGST - Petitioner is given liberty to manually file an appeal against impugned order regarding transitional credit of SGST for which they had valid evidence for payment of VAT of same amount: HCGST - For the period for which return was filed, registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively: HCHas Globalisation favoured capital more than labour? Can taxing super-rich help?GST - SC asks Govt not to use coercion for recovering arrearsChanging Tax Landscape in IndiaPrivate equity funds pouring in India’s healthcare sectorInterpretation of StatutesGoogle, Microsoft move Delhi HC against order to erase non-consensual intimate images16th Finance Commission invites views from general public on terms of referenceEvery party committed to ensure PoK returns to India; Jaishankar695 candidates to contest LS elections in Phase 5Astronomers’ efforts lead to discovery of a rocky planet with atmosphereCSIR hosts Student-Science Connect program on Climate ChangeVolkswagen asks EU not to raise tariffs on EVs from ChinaI-T - Assessee given insufficient time to file reply to Show Cause Notice; assessment order quashed; matter remanded for reconsidering assessee's replies: HCChina blocks imports from Intel & QualcommI-T - Assessee has 5 email IDs & responded to communications received on one of these IDs; Assessee cannot claim to have been denied an opportunity of personal hearing before passing of order: HCRecord rainfall damages over 1 lakh homes in Brazil; over 100 lives lostI-T- Additions framed u/s 68 r/w Section 115BBE are unwarranted where assessee duly explains nature & source of cash receipts, through sufficient documentation: ITATRussia bombards Ukraine’s power supply; Serious outages fearedI-T- Re-assessment cannot be resorted to beyond 4 years from end of relevant AY, where assessee has not failed to file ITR or to make full & true disclosure of facts necessary for assessment: ITATIndia received foreign remittance of USD 111 bn in 2022, says UNI-T- Receipt of subscription fees can't be considered as commercial activity: ITATPitroda resigns as Chairman of Indian Overseas Congress over racist remarkST - In case of payment received through cheque, it is the date of honouring cheque, which has to be construed as date of receipt of advance payment and since amount was received by appellant on or after appointed date, appellant would not be entitle to benefit of exemption notification: CESTAT86 flights of AI Express cancelled as crew goes on mass sick leaveCus - When undervaluation of goods is alleged solely based on value of contemporaneous imports, all details relating to such imports are to be necessarily established by Revenue: CESTAT
 
ST - M & M Ltd is legal entity which has two separate divisions - appellant is logistics division which provided logistics services to Farm Equipment Division - merely by taking separate ST registrations it cannot be said that both are separate legal entities - demand not sustainable: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

MUMBAI, DEC 24, 2012: THE appellant are the logistic division of M/s. Mahindra and Mahindra Limited. They are providing various logistics services to another division - Farm Equipment Sector (FES) Division of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.

A show cause notice was issued for demand of service tax for the logistics services provided by the appellant to their FES division for the period 15/12/2007 to March 2010.

The demand of Rs.82,17,904/- was confirmed by the CCE, Nagpur along with interest and various penalties and so the appellant is before the CESTAT.

The appellant submitted that they are one of the divisions of M/s Mahindra and Mahindra Limited and by taking separate service tax registration it cannot be held that both the divisions are separate legal entity; therefore, demand for the period 15/12/2007 to 10/09/2008 is not sustainable.

With respect to the demand for the period 11/09/2008 to March, 2010, it is submitted that since the appellant had become a separate legal entity and they were registered at their Mumbai office who discharged the service tax liability on the service rendered by them at Nagpur, the demand cannot be confirmed and since this fact could not be verified during the course of adjudication the matter may be remanded back for verification from the Range Superintendent of Mumbai.

The Revenue representative reiterated the impugned order and further submitted that as the appellant did not produce any relevant documents at the time of adjudication, pandora's box cannot be opened at this stage as to whether they have paid the service tax or not?

The Bench observed -

"6. Considering the submissions made by the learned Chartered Accountant we find that Mahindra and Mahindra Limited is a legal entity which is having two separate divisions. Merely by taking two separate service tax registrations it cannot be said that both are separate legal entities. Therefore, demand for the period 15/12/2007 to 10/09/2008 is not sustainable.

7. For the remaining period, the matter needs examination by the adjudicating authority after obtaining reports from the Range Superintendent of Mumbai whether the appellant has paid the service tax or not. For this purpose the matter is remanded back to the adjudicating authority to verify whether the appellant has paid the service tax for the period 11/09/2008 to March, 2010 thereafter to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law."

The appeal as well as the stay application was disposed of in the above terms.

Defying logic:

Pandora's Box is an artifact in Greek mythology, taken from the myth of Pandora's creation in Hesiod's Works and Days. The "box" was actually a large jar given to Pandora, which contained all the evils of the world.

(See 2012-TIOL-1919-CESTAT-MUM)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.