Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Saturday , February 28, 2015 | Updated : Feb 28, 14:53 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
BUDGET FLASH
 
'Substantial value' from assets located in India - when does Sec 9 get triggered? - Finance Bill provides an answer (See 'Budget Run-Up') Is proposed Section 78B of FA, 1994unconstitutional? (See 'Budget Run-Up') Duty not paid - Penalty follows in all cases, suppression or not (See 'Budget Run-Up') Place of Effective Management - Finance Bill proposes change to determine resident status (See 'Budget Run-Up') Interest paid by branch of foreign bank to HO and overseas branches chargeable to tax and subject to TDS Jaitley offers minor respite on depreciation u/s 32(iia)(See 'Budget Run-Up') GTA ST is on 30 % (See 'Budget Run-Up') Bye Bye to Education (CESSES)(See 'Budget Run-Up') Dead wood & something more removed from provisions of Settlement in Central Excise & Customs (See 'Budget Run-Up') Pleasant Amendment in Section 11AC (See 'Budget Run-Up') Section 80 of FA, 1994 to fade into oblivion - a draconian step? (See 'Budget Analysis') Mutual Fund distribution - Service tax makes a comeback (See 'Budget Analysis') Time to gear-up for GST (See 'Budget Analysis') Recovery of credit taken wrongly but not utilized is possible now - First accrued is first utilized - new Rule 14 of CCR, 2004 (See 'Budget Analysis') What happens to Education Cess credit lying in balance? (See 'Budget Analysis') Definition of Resident company redefined in Finance bill, 2015 (See 'Budget Analysis') Instant tea, Iced tea, LED lights/lamps brought under MRP assessment (See 'Budget Analysis') ST Valuation - If courts take a contrary view - Do the obvious - Amend the Act - Delhi High Court Ruling in Intercontinental Consultants undone (See 'Budget Analysis') Service tax exemption availed by non-resident Commission Agent to Indian exporter withdrawn (See 'Budget Analysis') Service tax exemption withdrawn for Mutual Fund Agent to MF; Distributor to MF or AMC; service by Lottery agent to distributor and also free telephone calls made by Airport and hospitals Litigation Management - Monetary Limit for case to be heard by Single ITAT Member hiked to Rs 15 lakh (See 'Budget Analysis') Service provided by Government brought under tax net Service Tax rate of 14% to be applicable only after enactment: education cess to continue till then Major changes proposed in Section 11 AC - No penalty for normal period cases if duty is paid along with interest within 30 days from Show Cause Notice Exclusion of value of rails - Retrospective exemption given Retrospective exemption granted to Railway or tramway track construction material Finance Bill - Cash seized to be adjusted towards assessee's tax liability Central Excise & Service Tax assessees allowed to issue digitally signed invoices Finance Bill cleans up provisions relating to Indirect Transfers under Section 9 of I-T Act MAT rationalised for members of AOP (Association of Persons) Rationalisation of Penal Provisions under Service Tax - Section 80 deleted No Change in Corporate Tax Rate for FY 2015-16 Chit funds and lottery to come under Service Tax Intaxicating - alcohol job work to attract Service tax Gold Monetisation Scheme: Depositors and jewellers to earn interest on metal account (See 'Mbuzz') Wealth tax gone but 2% surcharge levied on super rich; Medical allowance hiked to Rs 25000 (See 'Budget Analysis') Rental income from assets held by REITs to be taxed in hands of unit holders (See 'Budget Analysis') Foreign assets purchased out of tax evaded: 10 years jail; offence made non-compoundable and 300% penalty (See 'Budget Analysis') DTC Bill killed; Many good aspects incorporated in present I-T Act Service tax Negative List to be pruned No Service Tax on Varisth Bima Yojana Transport Allowance limit hiked to Rs 1600 Sec 80CCD benefit hiked by Rs 50,000 per annum Jaitley hikes exemption limit for medi claim from Rs 15K to 25K; for Sr Citizens it is to be 30K Clean Energy Cess hiked to Rs 200/- PMT; No service tax on effluent treatment plants Service tax rate goes up to 14% but education cess gone Excise duty on cigarette and tobacco hiked; Excise registration to be done in two working days; Cenvat Credit period extended from six months to 12 months TP threshold limit hiked from Rs 5 Crore to 20 Crore; Capital gains by FIIs not to be subjected to MAT Wealth Tax to be abolished; 2% surcharge levied on wealthy SAD removed for most goods with minor exception GAAR postponed for two years; Tax rate on royalty and FTS reduced to 10% Presence of Fund Managers not to be construed as PE Capital gains regime and STT regime to be rationalised to provide pass through facility Unreported assets outside India - Govt to make it predicate offence under PMLA Black Money Bill to be tabled - 10 years jail proposed; 300% penalty; No Settlement Commission option; No deductions to be allowed; even banks and companies to face prosecution and penalty Corporate tax rate to be reduced to 25% over four years Fiscal Deficit to be 3.9% in next fiscal HCs to have designated courts for resolution of Commercial disputes; Bill to be tabled Defence outlay hiked to Rs 2.46 lakh crore for 2015-16 Special Assistance like Telangana to be provided to Bihar, West Bengal also AIIMS to be set up in Punjab, Assam, J&K, HP, TN and Bihar + IIT in Karnataka + ISM Dhanbad becomes IIT + IIM to be set up in J & K Education Loan: Govt to set up formal platform to fund it Govt to launch National Skill Mission to enhance employability of youth Govt to go for Procurement Legislation; proposes mechanism to resolve contract disputes Govt to develop heritage sites to promote tourism FDI - Artificial distinction between FII & Portfolio Investment to go Govt to put in place New Direct Tax and Indirect Tax regime matching global standards Govt to introduce New Gold Monetisation Scheme; to introduce Indian Gold Coin with Ashok Chkra Govt to reform EPF and ESI Acts to make it more liberal Commodity Commission to be merged with SEBI Govt to set up Public Debt Management Agency to monitor borrowings Rs 5000 Cr allocated to National Infrastructure Development Fund Expert Panel to be set up to do away with prior-approval for starting business Govt earmarks Rs 1000 Cr to support tech start-ups FM allows tax-free bond option for road, rail and irrigation Investment in Infra Sector to go up by Rs 70,000 Crore; Govt to set up National Investment in Infrastructure; Govt to allocate Rs 20,000 Crore Unclaimed deposits of Rs 9000 Crore in PPF & EPF to be appropriated for Senior Citizen Welfare Fund NBFCs with Rs 500 Cr turnover to be construed as Financial Institution To improve Ease of Doing Business Index - Govt to go for New Bankruptcy Act
 
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
Subscribe TIOL Tube Channel on YouTube
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension