Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Saturday , August 29, 2015 | Updated : Aug 29, 12:28 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
Black Money Act - Addl CITs/JCITs to perform functions of AOs (See 'What's New') ACC goes for mega Secretary-level reshuffle; Dr Hashmukh Adhia is new Revenue Secretary (See 'Mixed Buzz') Unveil Comprehensive Strategy to tackle Black Money (See 'TIOL Edit') I-T - Whether sum shown as provision for bad debts by bank which is not credited to accounts of debtors and thus written off can be allowed as deduction - NO: ITAT (See '2015-TIOL-1350') Govt needs to regulate Pet Shops, Dog and Aquarium Fish Breeding: Law Commission Report (See 'Breaking News') Cus - Refund of pre-deposit - Commissioner avers that there was no intention of not complying with orders of CESTAT - language used in affidavit was only manner of drafting - Explanation accepted: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Compensation for Land Acquisition: Govt to issue Removal of Difficulties Order (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Review order - HC Full Bench has held that decision by Committee of CCs is administrative function - Tribunal has no jurisdiction whatsoever to strike down decision taken by Committee on administrative side - CST's appeal is restored to file of CESTAT for being disposed of on merits: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1990') ACC goes for major top level bureaucratic reshuffle: Shaktikanta Das promoted as Economic Affairs Secretary + Hasmukh Adhia is New Revenue Secretary + Sunil Arora is New I & B Ministry Secretary + Tapan Ray to be New Secretary, MCA For CBEC, TAR becomes Taxpayers' Services Directorate; DIPR becomes its subordinate office (See 'Circulars' in Excise) CBDT promotes two CCITs as Principal CCITs (See 'Promotion' in Pitara) Monetary Limits - Latest SC decision - CBDT directs field formations to quickly file review petitions (See 'Instructions' in Income Tax) Two PCITs locally transferred in Ahmedabad (See 'Transfer' in Pitara) NRI deposits raise India's external debt by 6.6% (See 'Mixed Buzz') India, Germany agree to amend DTAA; enhance exchange of information (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - When it is not disputed that appellant is not required to discharge any CE duty on goods exported by them and revenue authorities have held that amount debited is without any authority of law, natural corollary would be that amount is returned as Revenue can collect tax/duty only by authority of law: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') e-Governance important pillar of 'Digital India': Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - Petition seeking release of goods on ground that SCN was received after expiry of six months as stipulated u/s 110(2) - Petition dismissed as notice was despatched before expiry of six months: HC (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - Deduction - Excise Duty paid under protest - ITAT allows (See 'DDT' Column) I-T - Whether income from sale of property acquired in past can be claimed as capital gains when assessee, engaged in developing housing project, failed to declare same in books audited every year - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Govt aware of FTAs and dumping hurting Indian rubber and steel sectors: Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Chance taking petitioner - There is tendency of those persons who are liable to make payment of tax + interest + penalty to take chance before Court - Vigilant petitioner should have filed appeal within limitation period: HC (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - Reporting of Financial Transactions (See 'DDT') Tax paid by mistake - Why bring Section 11B into picture? (See 'Guest' Column) I-T - Whether if assessee is relying upon exception mentioned under rule 6DD, in that case burden of proof is upon assessee - YES: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1976') No IT Return under RTI Act - SC Dismisses Petition (See 'DDT') Shillong Customs arrests two persons with gold worth over Rs 40 lakhs Govt okays bid to import 1000 tonnes of onion at Rs 45 per kg; MMTC directed to float fresh tender for import of 10,000 tonnes onion Law Commission submits Report on Draft Model Investment Treaty (See 'Mixed Buzz') Law Commission for amendments in Bribery of Foreign Public Officials Bill (See 'Mixed Buzz') Ministry of Tourism to give Rs 600 Crore for Tourism Development in Bihar (See 'Mixed Buzz') Govt selects 184 districts for equitable healthcare facilities: PM Pressure builds on GST Balloon but CBEC continues to ... (See 'The Cob(Web)' Column) Black Money Act - Addl CITs/JCITs to perform functions of AOs (See 'What's New') ACC goes for mega Secretary-level reshuffle; Dr Hashmukh Adhia is new Revenue Secretary (See 'Mixed Buzz') Unveil Comprehensive Strategy to tackle Black Money (See 'TIOL Edit') I-T - Whether sum shown as provision for bad debts by bank which is not credited to accounts of debtors and thus written off can be allowed as deduction - NO: ITAT (See '2015-TIOL-1350') Govt needs to regulate Pet Shops, Dog and Aquarium Fish Breeding: Law Commission Report (See 'Breaking News') Cus - Refund of pre-deposit - Commissioner avers that there was no intention of not complying with orders of CESTAT - language used in affidavit was only manner of drafting - Explanation accepted: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Compensation for Land Acquisition: Govt to issue Removal of Difficulties Order (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Review order - HC Full Bench has held that decision by Committee of CCs is administrative function - Tribunal has no jurisdiction whatsoever to strike down decision taken by Committee on administrative side - CST's appeal is restored to file of CESTAT for being disposed of on merits: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1990') ACC goes for major top level bureaucratic reshuffle: Shaktikanta Das promoted as Economic Affairs Secretary + Hasmukh Adhia is New Revenue Secretary + Sunil Arora is New I & B Ministry Secretary + Tapan Ray to be New Secretary, MCA For CBEC, TAR becomes Taxpayers' Services Directorate; DIPR becomes its subordinate office (See 'Circulars' in Excise) CBDT promotes two CCITs as Principal CCITs (See 'Promotion' in Pitara) Monetary Limits - Latest SC decision - CBDT directs field formations to quickly file review petitions (See 'Instructions' in Income Tax) Two PCITs locally transferred in Ahmedabad (See 'Transfer' in Pitara) NRI deposits raise India's external debt by 6.6% (See 'Mixed Buzz') India, Germany agree to amend DTAA; enhance exchange of information (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - When it is not disputed that appellant is not required to discharge any CE duty on goods exported by them and revenue authorities have held that amount debited is without any authority of law, natural corollary would be that amount is returned as Revenue can collect tax/duty only by authority of law: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') e-Governance important pillar of 'Digital India': Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - Petition seeking release of goods on ground that SCN was received after expiry of six months as stipulated u/s 110(2) - Petition dismissed as notice was despatched before expiry of six months: HC (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - Deduction - Excise Duty paid under protest - ITAT allows (See 'DDT' Column) I-T - Whether income from sale of property acquired in past can be claimed as capital gains when assessee, engaged in developing housing project, failed to declare same in books audited every year - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') Govt aware of FTAs and dumping hurting Indian rubber and steel sectors: Minister (See 'Mixed Buzz') ST - Chance taking petitioner - There is tendency of those persons who are liable to make payment of tax + interest + penalty to take chance before Court - Vigilant petitioner should have filed appeal within limitation period: HC (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - Reporting of Financial Transactions (See 'DDT') Tax paid by mistake - Why bring Section 11B into picture? (See 'Guest' Column) I-T - Whether if assessee is relying upon exception mentioned under rule 6DD, in that case burden of proof is upon assessee - YES: HC (See '2015-TIOL-1976') No IT Return under RTI Act - SC Dismisses Petition (See 'DDT') Shillong Customs arrests two persons with gold worth over Rs 40 lakhs Govt okays bid to import 1000 tonnes of onion at Rs 45 per kg; MMTC directed to float fresh tender for import of 10,000 tonnes onion Law Commission submits Report on Draft Model Investment Treaty (See 'Mixed Buzz') Law Commission for amendments in Bribery of Foreign Public Officials Bill (See 'Mixed Buzz') Ministry of Tourism to give Rs 600 Crore for Tourism Development in Bihar (See 'Mixed Buzz') Govt selects 184 districts for equitable healthcare facilities: PM Pressure builds on GST Balloon but CBEC continues to ... (See 'The Cob(Web)' Column)
 
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
 
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2015 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension