Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Thursday , April 17, 2014 | Updated : Apr 17, 00:20 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
EC raps Azam Khan + Amit Shah for making controversial speeches TP: No Cost - No Guarantee? (See 'TII Edit' in Taxindiainternational.com) Indian Industry is used to grow in lax standard environment: Cab Secretary (See 'Mixed Buzz') Kolkata Airport Customs seizes 24 karat gold worth Rs 33 lakhs from two pax CBI sets up dedicated Sports Integrity Unit to probe sports frauds SC observes BCCI should probe IPL fixing scam Several posts of Secretary fall vacant; ACC orders addl charge Six killed in Karnataka bus fire + 476 drowned in South Korean boat mishap COFEPOSA - A Little Delay will not result in quashing Detention Order (See 'DDT' Column) Alleged red sanders smuggler does not get relief in Supreme Court; COFEPOSA Detention confirmed (See 'Breaking News') CBEC hikes tariff value of gold & silver but reduces for Crude Soya oil and RBD Palmolein (See NT 31 'What's New') Income tax - Whether provisions of Sec 10A enlarge ambit of term 'computer programme' by including process of management of electronic data - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Public Peeing - Not even God could solve - What can a High Court do? (See 'DDT') CX - Refund - assessee gives up right to claim interest before Adjudication authority - Assessee is not barred from claiming interest at appellate stage - No estoppel against law: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') He/She/? - The Third Gender (See 'DDT') Central Excise - Valuation - cylinder testing charges are not includible in assessable value of liquid chlorine: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Applications invited for post of Director (Anti-Smuggling) in CBEC (See 'Deputation' in Pitara) CX - Whether CENVAT credit on inputs can be allowed to be availed and further passed on to buyers despite activity of slitting and pickling on CR coils having been held by HC as not amounting to manufacture - Matter referred to TM: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') SC grants status of Third Gender to eunuchs; Amnesty welcomes it Govindacharya urges EC to curb use of black money India born poet Vijay Seshadri bags 2014 Pulitzer Prize Secretary, Economic Affairs, Arvind Mayaram, designated as Finance Secretary Kota CBN arrests one person with heroin Just because assessee is liable to pay VAT on sale involved in supply of goods at canteen, it cannot be held that it is not liable to payment of service tax: High Court (See 'Breaking News') Assessee undertakes not to claim interest on refund - No estoppel! (See 'DDT' Column) World Trade to grow by 4.7% in 2014: WTO (See 'Mixed Buzz') Income tax - Whether income from letting out property is to be treated as business income merely because property is commercial in nature and rental is exorbitantly high - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Arrest under Service Tax - Kanda Rameshbabu Naidu case (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) Provisional Anti Dumping Duty on Cast Aluminium Alloy Wheels (See 'DDT') ST - During audit certain discrepancy was found in tax payment and immediately appellant paid same along with interest - no intention to evade tax - penalties imposed u/s 76, 77 & 78 set aside: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') CENVAT Credit on inputs contained in scrap generated during manufacture of exempted goods - Assessee is entitled to credit - waste and scrap are 'final products' - Supreme Court (See 'DDT') CX - Notification having character of exemption cannot be forced upon an assessee if it does not suit him - Liberal and strict construction of an exemption provision is to be invoked at different stages of interpreting it: HC (See 'Breaking News') EU, Japan & US protest against Indonesian ban on export of mineral ores (See 'Mixed Buzz') Stay order passed by Bench in matter of applications filed by main appellant cannot be held to lay down any binding precedent of ratio - Pre-deposit ordered - Tribunal by Majority (See 'Breaking News') CBI Cashier in CBI Net (See 'DDT') Various Opinion Polls indicate thin Majority for BJP-led NDA Turkey suspects tax evasion by Twitter; directs Twitter to open office and start paying taxes Parliament competent to impose Service Tax on Restaurants and hotels - Single Judge Kerala HC order cannot be accepted: Bombay HC (See 'Breaking News') Yet another attack on PM; Book by former Coal Secretary describes him as weak PM ST - SC Judgment in Mafatlal cannot be applied to such an extent so as to totally override and brush aside provision like Sec 11B with rule of limitation carved out therein - Refund claim time barred: HC (See 'Breaking News') ST - Works Contract - Appellant cannot be compelled to pay ST under Composition Scheme or value service part by resorting to Rule 2A & thus be held ineligible for CENVAT availed on cement or TMT bars used for factory shed - Appeals allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Excise Valuation and Sales Tax Retention ... Oh No, Not again! (See 'Guest Column') I-T - Whether marginal underutilization of FSI can be a valid ground for rejecting assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IB (See '2014-TIOL-483-HC') UN Chief urges for universal legal climate deal by year-end (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - Appellant, a manufacturer of tyres - sale of tubes & flaps to dealers in replacement market as trading activity - Credit taken on tubes inserted into tyre an cleared to OEM - no penalty: HC (See '2014-TIOL-556') EC under attack: Pawar says EC going 'overboard'; Azam Khan of SP says EC acting on behest of Congress Party IMF reform becoming major bone of contention between G-20 and USA ST - service provided by appellant to customers by facilitating fore-closure of loans clearly falls outside ambit of business auxiliary service: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Major OECD countries trim tax cre
 
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension