Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Thursday , July 28, 2016 | Updated : Jul 28, 08:58 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
Missing Gold - Indian Customs upkeeps its vaults with too many faults! (See 'THE COB (WEB)' Column) CX - Subsequent packeting of pre-determined quantity of already marketable 'O' Ring & 'U' Cap seals in a plastic bag has not made products further marketable -No CE duty on Seal Kits: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Whether if provision is made for gratuity for retiring employees with respect to previous year, assessee cannot be denied deduction u/s 40A(7)(b)(i) even if actual payment is not made - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Cus - Refund of SAD - Used tyres upon import are converted to 'crumb rubber' and thereafter sold -Claim of appellant that discharge of VAT obligation immunizes it from former obligation is untenable - Appeal dismissed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') IGI Airport Customs nabs five passengers; seizes Foreign Currency worth Rs.1.24 crores concealed in rectum Cabinet approves key amendments to GST Bill, agrees to drop 1 percent additional tax on inter-state transactions Cabinet approves Indo-Cambodia Bilateral Investment Treaty Cabinet gives assent for setting up of AIIMS in Bhatinda Provisional attachment of property u/s 73C of the FA, 1994 - Board reiterates instructions (See 'Circ 196' in Service Tax) IGI Airport Customs seizes 8.5 kg gold worth Rs 2.25 Crore Govt promoting use of khadi by Air India, Railways Bonds to be settled under 'dirty price’ mechanism: BSE Goa Govt to install wi-fi in schools, colleges across state CBI has arrested 34 Gazetted Officers & 45 Non-Gazetted Officers in 112 corruption cases during January to July 15, 2016 (See 'Mixed Buzz') Merchandise exports have registered an increase of 1.27 percent in Dollar terms in June 2016 Cus - Revocation of CHA licence is bad in law since time limit for completion of inquiry in terms of Regulation 22(5) of CHALR 2004 has not be adhered to: High Court (See 'Breaking News') Automotive Mission Plan [AMP 2026] to create 65 million jobs Monsoon to push GDP growth to over 8% this fiscal: Arvind Panagariya Mere registration of criminal case cannot be a ground to revoke an arms license: Bombay High Court 60 % Indians to live in cities by 2050: Govt Special Aadhaar Enrolment Drive for Students for offering scholarship (See 'Mixed Buzz') India invites Bangladesh to avail services of Indian Companies for executing telecom projects (See 'Mixed Buzz') Customs - Assessment of Bulk Liquid Cargo Imports (See 'DDT' Column) CX - Exemption in terms of notfn. 30/2004-CE was not availed on POY Yarn for which services of renovation and modernization of plant was undertaken - CENVAT credit admissible: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') States' Demand For Their Exclusive 'Single Control' over 'Small Business' - An Analysis (See 'Guest' Column) I-T - Whether when dumb document is seized from third party, duty is cast on Revenue to prove that transactions have really taken place and sum involved constitutes undisclosed income - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Time of Supply - Model GST (See 'ST se GST tak') Fuel injection pumps exported and re-imported after fitting on to diesel engines - benefit of exemption under Notification No 94/96 Cus is not admissible : CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') GST - Waiting for monsoon saugaat (See 'ST se GST tak') Central Excise duty on articles of jewellery - CBEC puts a new taxation regime in place (See Central Excise in ‘What’s New’) Anti-dumping duty on imports of Rubber Chemicals viz. PX 13 and TDQ imported from EU & MOR imported from PR China - levy continued up to 27.07.2017 (See Cus ADD 35 in 'What's New') Exemption from Export duty to Organic Sugar up to 10,000MT in a year subject to specified conditions (See Customs Tariff 43 in 'What's New') CBDT issues transfer order of 14 ACIT / DCITs (See 'CBDT Transfer' in Pitara) Prices of complex fertilizers fall (See 'Mixed Buzz')
 
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

“6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....”

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

“10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...”

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
Visit TIOLCorplaws.com
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Customs Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • CCRs - 2004
  • Central Excise Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • Service Tax Rules
  • 37B Order
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension