TIOL Tube
Forgot Password |  Register  
Friday , October 28, 2016 | Updated : Oct 28, 12:18 IST
GST   Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us
GSTN, DGFT & 14 States join hands for sharing of forex realisation data (See 'Mixed Buzz') Difference between Tariff and Non-Tariff Notifications (See 'DDT' Column) VAT - Whether power to seize goods is not dependent upon bona fides of past transaction, but must be exercised in backdrop of seized goods falling within mischief of Sec 48 – Yes: HC (See 'Breaking News') Higher DA for Babus - Serving and Retired (See 'DDT') Cus - For two months, importer cleared goods by availing benefit of notfn 73/2005 & only when probe commenced against other importers they discharged differential duty - Penalty upheld: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Transferability of goods imported/procured by debiting duty in SFISscrips – Ministry Clarifies (See 'DDT') CX - Once amount payable under CCR is treated as duty of excise, inputs & capital goods removed without payment of duty shall be liable to confiscation u/r 25(1) of CER, 2002: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Will CGST Officers wear Uniform? (See 'DDT') CBDT takes APA tally to 108 (See 'TII Brief' in Cabinet okay release of first dues of DA payments Bangalore CX Commissioner gets addl charge of Bangalore Customs Chennai Customs Commissioner gets addl charge of Trichy Customs Cabinet grants assent for one time relaxation in Horticulture cost norms (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cabinet reviews grades of Posts & Telecommunications Accounts & Finance Service (See 'Mixed Buzz') World Gold Council floats campaign to drive awareness on availability of Indian Gold Coin (See 'Mixed Buzz') EPFO paired with Common Services Centers for ease of EPF members (See 'Mixed Buzz') Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act - CBDT notifies jurisdiction of certain officers across India as specified authority (See 'Notification 100' in 'What's New') RBI permits Person resident outside India to transact currency derivative contract + FEMA - Subsidiary allowed to issue shares to its non-resident holding company against preoperative expenses up to the threshold of 5% (See ‘FEMA Notification’ in ‘Fema)’ CBDT fears revenue shortfall; calls for fresh strategies & close monitoring (See 'Mixed Buzz') Income tax - Whether transfer of assessment file from jurisdiction of one AO to another is valid even if there is no agreement between two jurisdictional Commissioners - NO: Supreme Court (See 'Breaking News') GST Tryst with Three Fault lines! (See 'The Cob (Web)' Column) Kerala General Sales Tax Act - sale by brand name holder or trade mark holder to be first sale for purpose of Sec 5(2) - KAIL is brand name owner of 'Sansui': SC (See 'Breaking News') GST - Air conditioners and hawai chappals cannot be taxed at same rate - Jaitley (See 'DDT' Column) I-T - Whether when assessee's explanation about cash deposits in his savings account was concurrently rejected by both Commissioner and Tribunal, it warrants intervention by higher courts - NO: HC (See 'Breaking News') New Zealand keen for early FTA finalisation: PM (See 'Mixed Buzz') Cus - Committee has not applied its mind - Mere accordance of approval to appeal because impugned order is not in favour of Revenue is not proper discharge of duties statutorily assigned: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 Comes into Force from 1st November (See 'DDT') ST - Amount charged by club to its members for sale of items such as liquor is not taxable as evidences such as sale bills, balance sheet, CA certificate and VAT statements submitted to Sales Tax Department evidencing such sale are available: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Issue of Intimation under section 143(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 beyond the prescribed time in non-scrutiny cases – CBDT Issues Order (See 'DDT') ACC okays appointment of S Girish Kumar as CMD of HMT Ltd + S K Choudhary as CMD of IRCON CBEC goes for fresh procedure for clearance of imported metal scrap (See 'Cir 48' in What's New) Delhi DRI seizes firearms, Drone and Steroids at Foreign Post Office; Consignment came from France CII says there are major ground-level changes in Investment Climate (See 'Mixed Buzz')
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

“6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....”

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

“10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...”

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)

Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Income-Tax Rules
  • Income-Tax Act
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Reports
  • Customs Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • CCRs - 2004
  • Central Excise Rules
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • GST Kitty
  • Notifications
  • Service Tax Rules
  • 37B Order
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • FDI Approved
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension