Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Tuesday , March 31, 2015 | Updated : Mar 31, 18:51 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Justice Rajendra Dhirajlal Kothari + Justice Abdullah Gulamahmed Uraizee appointed as full-fledged Judge of Gujarat HC + President appoints four Addl Judges in Bombay HC + two Addl Judges in Gujarat HC Lucknow CBI nabs Income Tax Officer accepting bribe of Rs 2 lakhs CBEC assigns addl charge of Mumbai II Zone to CC, Vizag; DG (ST) to CC, Mumbai I Zone; Nagpur Zone to CC, Bhubaneshwar and DG (Safeguard) to DGEP (See 'Service News') India's external debt rises by 3.5% by December-end (See 'Mixed Buzz') WB okays USD 500 mn funds for SIDBI for MSME growth innovation APA - CBDT extends deadline for filing roll back application to June 30, 2015 (See 'Mixed Buzz') Ease of Doing Business - Commerce Ministry to empower SEZ Development Commissioner to reduce paper work Cus - Multifunction machines are different and distinct from photocopying machines and,therefore, during period prior to amendment of FTP w.e.f 5.6.2012, import of these goods did not require any import licence: CESTAT by Majority (See 'Breaking News') Non-stop service to facilitate trade between India & Qatar: First Direct Container vessel reaches Doha CII Business Confidence Index marginally improves in Q4 Import of old photocopier - for determining value of used capital goods, NIDB data is not relevant as no two consignments of used goods would be comparable - enhancement of value rejected: CESTAT by Majority (See 'Breaking News') FTP - Tomorrow? + FTP - Guidelines for processing of online IEC applications (See 'DDT') Income tax - Whether if assessee-club sells complimentary liquor for a price, such activity is to be construed as commercial in nature - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Refund under Rule 5 - Implications of amendment in Budget 2015 (See 'ST se GST tak') ST - Amount paid in excess during investigation - Merely because adjudicating authority had appropriated amount paid towards tax demand, refund cannot be denied when Commr(A) reduced tax liability by holding that excess amount is not deposit & claim is hit by bar of limitation: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Company Law - Amounts received by private companies from their members, directors or their relatives before 1st April 2014 - Clarification (See 'DDT') Whether final order of re -assessment passed without giving opportunity of hearing to assessee is void ab initio (See '2015-TIOL-772') Pension Cut for CRPF Commandant using an official vehicle while on leave (See 'DDT') India about to enter into high trajectory growth orbit, says President Mumbai CBI nabs Income Tax Officer accepting bribe Election Commission organises consultation on 'Political Finance & Law Commission Measures' (See 'Mixed Buzz') TRAI seeks feedback on over-the-top services (See 'Mixed Buzz') President confers Bharat Ratna on Madan Mohan Malviya posthumously Service tax e-payment can be made till midnight of March 31; RBI extends banking hours till 8 pm tomorrow (See Cir 182 in 'What's New') 14 % Service Tax not with effect from 1st April 2015 – Nagpur Commissioner’s Clarification (See 'DDT') CX - while incorporating provision into existing statute, Legislatures are fully aware of position of law - Pre-deposit mandatory even in respect of orders passed prior to 06.08.2014 and appeals filed thereafter: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') DRI alone seizes over 200 kg gold on All India basis in past 72 hours CX - Digital Records - Board Proposes to issue Notification and Circular - Invites Feedback (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether insertion of Explanation to Sec 80-IB(9) vide Finance Act, 2009 with retro effect explaining meaning of term 'undertaking' is unconstitutional and ultra vires to Article 14 of Constitution - YES: HC (See 'Breaking News') Interest on differential duty consequent to final assessment (See 'Guest' Column) ST - Work undertaken is harvesting & transporting sugarcane to factory for which labour is employed - Service brought under tax net under Manpower Recruitment envisages supply of labour per se - Demand not sustainable: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Registration - Netizens frustrated by ACES (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether sec 127(2)(a) is a machinery provision and CIT is having power of transfer even without assigning any reason: HC (See '2015-TIOL-767')
 
Bookmark and Share
CX - Notfn No 32/99 is meant for encouraging industrial growth in N-E, hence deserves to be interpreted liberally - Revenue seeking denial of refund on ground that caps are not integral part of tubes, is illogical - appeal dismissed: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

KOLKATA, OCT 16, 2012: THIS is a Revenue appeal.

The facts of the case are that the appellant had filed a refund claim for Rs.20,55,749/-paid by them through their account current (PLA) during the month of March, 2006. The said refund claim was filed in terms of paragraph 3(A) of the Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 being a new industrial unit which commenced its commercial production on or after 24.12.1997. After due verification, the adjudicating authority had sanctioned part of the refund claim.

In reducing the refund claim the adjudicating authority had put forth the following reasons -

+ the appellant purchased caps and availed CENVAT Credit on the same and after fitting it on the tubes cleared the same on payment of duty.

+ caps of the empty tubes are not an integral part of such tubes and the value of such caps are not includible in the assessable value.

+ that since no manufacturing activity is involved in the process of procuring and selling out the caps along with manufactured tubes hence the amount paid against clearance of such caps is not admissible for refund in terms of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999.

The Commissioner(A)allowed the appeal filed by the assessee by observing that the caps along with sized laminates and shoulders are placed in the machine and what comes out is a complete tube fitted with cap and hence the value had been correctly included and refund was correctly claimed. The apex court decisions in UOI vs. Metal Box - 1996 (87) ELT 327 (SC) and Burn Standard Co. v. UOI - 1992 (60) ELT 671 (SC) were relied upon by the lower appellate authority.

As mentioned, Revenue is not pleased with this order and is, therefore, before the CESTAT.

The Revenue representative reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority and also placed reliance inter alia on the decision in M/s. Plasmac Machine Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE - (2002-TIOL-455-SC-CX) wherein the judgement of the Supreme Court in M/s. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. had been distinguished.

The respondent submitted that the issue relates to availability of exemption Notification No.32/99 dt. 08.07.1999 and did not relate to determination of value of excisable goods, namely, Lamitubes fitted with the caps; that the duty paid caps are purchased by them from open market and used in the automatic process of manufacture of Lamitubes and the complete product cleared by them is Lamitubes fitted with caps on which excise duty was paid by them; that the cases cited by the Revenue are distinguishable; that the department for subsequent period has allowed refund on the said Lamitubes in remand proceedings and the said order has been accepted as no appeals were filed against those orders.

The Bench observed -

“6. Heard both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in the present case revolves around a narrow compass. It relates to the eligibility of exemption Notification No.32/99-CE dt.08.07.1999 extended to the industrial units situated in north-east area. The applicants are manufacturers of Lamitubes which are used in packaging of goods, namely, cosmetics. The applicant manufactured the bare tube in their factory and purchased the caps from outside and after fitting the caps on the Lamitubes in an integrated manufacturing process cleared the Lamitubes fitted with caps on payment of duty. The Revenue has not disputed the said payment of duty but objected that benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 could not be entered to the value of caps as the said caps were not manufactured in the factory of the applicants, but procured from outside. We do not find merit in the contention of the Revenue....

7. On a plain reading of the said Notification, it is clear that the manufacturers situated in north-eastern region were entitled to the benefit as allowed under the said Notification on the duty leviable on the goods manufactured and cleared by them from their factory. Hence it is illogical and incorrect to allege that the Lamitubes fitted with caps were not subjected to levy of any duty but only the bare Lamitubes which were manufactured and cleared by the applicant and leviable to duty....”

Placing reliance on the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata vs. Rupa & Co. Ltd. (2004-TIOL-65-SC-CUS) & Commissioner of Customs(Preventive), Mumbai vs. M.Ambalal and Company (2010-TIOL-111-SC-CUS) that a beneficial Notification should be given a liberal interpretation, the Bench further observed -

“10. Applying the principles laid down in the above cases we find that the present Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 is meant for encouraging industrial growth as well as expansion of existing industrial units in the north-eastern sector. Therefore, the Notification No.32/99-CE deserves to be interpreted liberally so as to give effect to its objective and purpose. Hence, we are of the view that for calculating the refund amount as per the said Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999 the value of the complete tube is relevant but not the bare tube excluding the value of caps. We find that refund of the duty paid through PLA during the relevant period had not been disputed in the present case. Also, we find that for the subsequent period, the adjudicating authority on de novo adjudication of order-in-original No. 54/R-03/2006 dated 31.03.2006 on a remand from this Tribunal had accepted the interpretation that for extending the benefit of Notification No.32/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, the value of caps ought to be included in the total value of Lamitubes. In these circumstances, we do not find any merit in the appeal filed by the Revenue, and accordingly, the same is dismissed...”

In fine, the Revenue Appeal was dismissed.

(See 2012-TIOL-1424-CESTAT-KOL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
Subscribe to TIOLTube
Download TIOL App
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • CESTAT
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension