Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Thursday , May 26, 2016 | Updated : May 26, 10:48 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
Second Anniversary of Modi Sarkar - Taxation turns Less Litigious Turf (See 'The Cob (Web) Column') Mandatory pre-deposit is applicable to appeals filed on or after 06.08.2014 - Amendment did not take away vested right - AP and Kerala HC view not correct: Madras HC (See 'Breaking News') Customs - Passenger Satisfaction – Mumbai Airport – CBEC Survey (See 'DDT Column') I-T - Whether transaction between assessee company and its Director in a running Current a/c is to be treated as loan or deposit - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Academy for Research in Social Security renamed as Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya National Academy (See 'Mixed Buzz') Customs Information to Passengers Coming from abroad – Elephant of blind (See 'DDT') CX - Supplementary invoices issued in respect of Input services - prior to 1.4.2011 credit cannot be denied by borrowing restriction provided in un-amended Rule 9(1) of CCR, 2004: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Customs – Baggage – Mr. Chairman, Where to get information? Departmental Websites are horribly inadequate (See 'DDT') Interaction through PRAGATI - PM directs quick installation of equipment to detect multi-drug resistant TB in districts + calls for speedy completion of modernisation of Bhilai Steel Plant Sahar airport - Survey finds Custom's clearance satisfactory Applications invited for post of Deputy Director in ED (See 'Deputation'in 'Pitara') Union Cabinet okays National Capital Goods Policy; to up exports from 27% to 40% of production (See 'Mixed Buzz') Amendment to Bonus Act doubled benefit amount: Labour Minister(See 'Mixed Buzz') President invites Chinese investors to be partners in India's growth story Krishi Kalyan Cess - all or any? (See 'DDT') French taxmen raid Google's Paris office in alleged USD 2.5 bn tax evasion case (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - CENVAT - Improper dimension of goods mentioned in invoices - no malafide intention can be attributed but this does not mean that penalty needs to be set aside - Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 reduced: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Amendment in India-Mauritius DTAA to increase size of investment and also bring legitimate funds into India, says FM FTP - Indore SEZ Included (See 'DDT') ST - Even prior to 1.4.2011 since no ST was payable on auction sale of abandoned cargo, credit was not admissible on input service used in such output activity - in subsequent SCNs it cannot be said that there is suppression of fact on part of appellant so as to impose penalty u/s 78: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') New Kerala Govt may consider lifting of ban on liquor FTP - Committee on Quality Complaint & Trade Dispute (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether interest income from bank deposits is to be treated as 'income from other sources' if assessee fails to prove that deposits were for business purpose - YES: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Pakistan Customs Tribunal - No Head - Same Problem like our CESTAT (See 'DDT') India inks pact with World Bank for USD 100 mn loan for Karnataka Water Project Govt notifies 13 more Smart Cities; Lucknow tops list of winners of Fast Track Competition (See 'Breaking News') Legislative backlog in Rajya Sabha needs to be cleared quickly, says Mr Naidu (See 'Mixed Buzz') CBDT to hold Chief Commissioners’ Annual Conference on June 1 & 2, 2016 Conversion of partnership firm into company - no capital gain tax (See 'Guest Column')
 
Bookmark and Share
No Service Tax on Foreign Remittance - CBEC Clarifies

DDT in Limca Book of RecordsTIOL-DDT 1898
11.07.2012
WEDNESDAY

 

 

AFTER all, it was only a storm in the pipeline. Shashi Tharoor can relax and all the agitation in the Gulf about the brutal Indian Government imposing a high tax on foreign remittances by Indians abroad was only because of a misunderstanding of Law.

And the CBEC Clarifies:

1. There is no service tax per se on the amount of foreign currency remitted to India from overseas.

2. In the negative list regime, 'service' has been defined in clause (44) of section 65B of the Finance Act 1994, as amended, which excludes transaction in money.

3. As the amount of remittance comprises money, the activity does not comprise a 'service' and thus not subjected to service tax.

4. In case any fee or conversion charges are levied for sending such money, they are also not liable to service tax as the person sending the money and the company conducting the remittance are located outside India. In terms of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012, such services are deemed to be provided outside India and thus not liable to service tax.

5. Even the Indian counterpart bank or financial institution who charges the foreign bank or any other entity for the services provided at the receiving end, is not liable to service tax as the place of provision of such service shall be the location of the recipient of the service, i.e. outside India, in terms of Rule 3 of the Place of Provision of Services Rules, 2012.

Thus, the Board has clarified without any ambiguity that the service is not taxable at all. But why did it take so much time for the Board to clarify this? Why did they allow confusion to spread all over the world? Shouldn't they have reacted immediately after Shashi Tharoor shot off his letter to the Prime Minister? Board should have a slightly better PR outfit.

CBEC Circular No. 163/14/2012-ST, Dated: July 10, 2012

Foreign Trade Policy - Duty Credit Scrips can be used to Pay Excise Duty on Domestic Procurement

THE Foreign Trade Policy allowed scrips under different schemes of Chapter 3 of Foreign Trade Policy, namely, Focus Product Scheme (FPS), Focus Market Scheme (FMS), Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog Yojana (VKGUY) Scheme, Status Holder Incentive Scrip (SHIS) Scheme, Market Linked Focused Product (MLFPS) Scheme, Served From India Scheme (SFIS) and Agri. Infrastructure Incentive Scrip (AIIS) Scheme, for import of goods as per conditions of these Schemes.

The Supplement 2012-13 to the Policy announced on 5th June 2012 allowed these scrips to be utilized for payment of Excise Duty for domestic procurement. Earlier only scrips under SFIS were so permitted for procurement of goods from domestic market. Now all scrips are permitted to source from domestic market so as to encourage manufacturing, value addition and employment.

This was an important measure for import substitution to help in saving of foreign exchange in addition to creating additional employment.

Accordingly, Para 3.17.5(c) of the Foreign Trade policy now states,

“Duty Credit Scrip can also be utilised for payment of Excise Duty on domestic procurement of such items as permitted to be imported under respective scheme”.

This means that the goods can now be procured from the DTA instead of importing them and excise duty can be paid from the scrip. This is what the Foreign Trade Policy states, but you don't get an excise exemption through the Foreign Trade Policy. You can't walk away with goods from a factory without paying excise duty. You need an excise notification and there had to be a procedure. And that was nowhere in sight even after a month of the change in Foreign Trade policy. It was a game of DGFT proposing and CBEC disposing.

Now, the Revenue Department has come up with Notifications exempting the goods and prescribing the procedure.

The salient features:

1. The scrip should be registered with the Customs authority at the port of registration

2. The holder of the scrip, who may either be the person to whom the scrip was originally issued or a transferee-holder, should present the said scrip to the said Customs authority along with a letter or proforma invoice from the supplier or manufacturer indicating details of its jurisdictional Central Excise Officer and the description, quantity, value of the goods to be cleared and the duties leviable thereon.

3. The Customs authority, taking into account the debits already made towards imports, shall debit the duties leviable, but for this exemption in or on the reverse of the said scrip and also mention the necessary details thereon, updates its own records and sends written advice of these actions to the Central excise Officer;

4. At the time of clearance, the holder of the scrip should present the said scrip debited by the said Customs authority to the Central Excise Officer along with an undertaking addressed to the said Officer that in case of any amount short debited in the said scrip he shall pay on demand an amount equal to the short debit, along with applicable interest;

5. Based on the said written advice and undertaking, the said Officer should endorse the clearance particulars and validate, on the reverse of the said scrip, the details of the duties leviable, but for this exemption, which were debited by the said Customs authority, and keeps a record of such clearances;

6. The manufacturer should retain a copy of the said scrip, debited by the said Customs authority and endorsed by the Central Excise Officer and duly attested by the holder of the scrip, in support of the clearance under this notification.

Now, who is this mysterious Central Excise Officer? The Notification says, jurisdictional Central Excise Officer (hereinafter referred as the said Officer). Now Inspector to Commissioner - they are all jurisdictional officers. Can the documents be presented to anyone from Inspector to Commissioner? Why can't they specify the officer?

A great great commendable gesture of the CBEC in this notification is that they have stipulated that the holder of the scrip, to whom the goods were cleared, shall be entitled to avail the drawback or CENVAT credit of the duties of excise against the amount debited in the said scrip and validated at the time of clearance. This single act would ensure avoidance of a mountain of mindless litigation. DDT salutes the Board for the thoughtful legislation.

The Following are the exemption notifications for the various schemes.

1. Focus Product Scheme - Notification No. 29/2012-CX., Dated: July 9, 2012

2. Focus Market Scheme - Notification No. 30/2012-CX., Dated: July 9, 2012

3. Agri. Infrastructure Incentive Scrip - Notification No. 31/2012- CX., Dated: July 9, 2012

4. Vishesh Krishi and Gram Udyog Yojana (Special Agriculture and Village Industry Scheme) - Notification No. 32/2012-CX., Dated: July 9, 2012

5. Status Holder Incentive Scheme - Notification No. 33/2012- CX., Dated: July 9, 2012

But are they exempted or duty paid? So far, so good, but are these goods to be treated as exempted or duty paid? When they are allowing credit, obviously they consider them duty paid. They should have amended the CENVAT Credit Rules also to clear the position that these goods will not be considered as exempted.

Consequential Customs Amendments

CONSEQUENT to the above Excise Notifications, amendments are made in the following Customs Tariff Notifications to incorporate the above excise notifications in them:

1. 92/2009-Customs, dated the 11th September, 2009.

2. 93/2009-Customs, dated the 11th September, 2009.

3. 94/2009-Customs, dated the 11th September, 2009.

4. 95/2009-Customs, dated the 11th September, 2009

5. 104/2009-Customs, dated the 14th September, 2009

Notification No. 44/2012-Cus., Dated: July 9, 2012

Anti Dumping Duty on Vitrified Porcelain Tiles - Provisional Assessment

ANTI Dumping Duty on import of Vitrified Porcelain Tiles originating in, or exported from the People's Republic of China (China PR) and United Arab Emirates, was provisionally imposed vide Notification No. 50/2002 dated 02.05.2002. This Notification was valid till 01.11.2002. But by Notification No. 73/2003 dated 01.05.2003, definitive anti dumping duty was imposed, but with effect from the date of provisional anti dumping duty, that is 02.05.2002. This notification also expired on 02.05.2007.

The Government again freshly imposed the anti dumping duty on the product with effect from 27.06.2008 by Notification No. 82/2008 - Cus dated 27.06.2008.

Was there no dumping between 02.05.2007 and 26.06.2008?

Now based on the recommendations of the Designated Authority, on review, Government has ordered provisional assessment in respect of two parties on the goods, when originating in or exported from China PR.

Notification No. 35/2012-Cus., (ADD), Dated: July 10, 2012

WCO Chief in India

Legal Corner Icon

WORLD Customs Organisation Secretary General, Kunio Mikuriya, visited New Delhi, on 9 July 2012 for a working session on India's progress regarding WCO initiatives.

Indian Customs has examined its situation in relation to the Economic Competitiveness Package

(ECP) conceptual chart and supporting tools presented to the WCO Council during its recent sessions in Brussels. Viewing the CBEC as a comprehensive package for streamlining Customs activities through various tools, India has already identified areas where further progress may be required. In line with the Guidelines for Post Clearance Audit (PCA) included in the WCO Revenue Package, India implemented onsite PCA in 2011 and introduced self-assessment at the same time, which has benefited trusted traders for facilitation purposes and also improved their compliance. CBEC is also interested in research on the informal sector which the WCO intends to undertake.

The Secretary General appreciated the work done by Indian Customs in adapting and incorporating WCO initiatives at the national level, in order to enhance the value of these initiatives. Picture shows him with CBEC Chief SK Goel.

 Jurisprudentiol – Thursday's cases

Legal Corner IconCentral Excise

Valuation - Addition of Pre-delivery inspection charges (PDI) and after sales service charges collected by dealers in transaction value - manufacturing of a product and marketability thereof are inbuilt elements of scheme of AV under Section 4 of CEA, 1944 - Pre-deposit ordered of Rs.1.06 Crores: CESTAT

APPLICANTS are manufacturers of cars and selling the same through dealers throughout the country. As per the Agreement, the dealers were given fixed discount for selling cars and dealers have to provide Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI) and two free services from such dealers' margin. The CCE, Aurangabad confirmed the demand of more than Rs.3.11 crores with “auto” penalties and interest on the ground that the charges in respect of PDI and free service charges are to be added to the 'transaction value' of the cars in view of the provisions of S.4 of the CEA, 1944 r/w Rule 6 of the Valuation Rules, 2000.

Income Tax

Whether for availing Sec 54EC benefits, assessee earning capital gains on land transfer is required to count six months period from date of receipt of sale consideration or date of transfer of property - sale consideration, rules ITAT

THE  issues before the Tribunal are - Whether when assessee forms a JV with a builder for development of a property and enters into an irrevocable agreement, the date of agreement is to be treated as the relevant date for taxing the capital gains or the date of registration of the deed - Whether when it was not possible for the assessee to have invested the amounts in the specified Bonds within a period of 6 months due to non receipt of consideration, the amount can be deposited within 6 months from the date of receipt of amount and the exemption will be allowed. And the verdict partly goes in favour of the assessee.

Service Tax

Bombay Flying Club cannot fly away from Service Tax liability - Conducting Training courses in Aircraft Maintenance Engineering and Flying School (Pilot training) & overhauling work of aircrafts is prima facie taxable under Service Tax category of 'Commercial Coaching or Training Services' and 'Management, maintenance and repair Services' - Pre-deposit ordered of Rs.1.50 Crores: CESTAT

CBEC had clarified that the training imparted by the institutions cannot be considered as courses recognized by law as the institutes are not created or recognized by the law. It was also clarified that the training programmes conducted by these institutes will not be eligible for the benefit of service tax exemption under notification 24/2004-ST as the institute courses do not directly enable the trainee getting the requisite employment.

See our columns Tomorrow for the judgements

Until Tomorrow with more DDT

Have a Nice Day

Mail your comments to vijaywrite@taxindiaonline.com


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Sub rule 6 of Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules needs amendment

This is with reference to DDT-1898 dated 11.7.2012 wherein information regarding use of duty credit scrips for payment of Central Excise duty has been published.
It is rightly pointed out that such clearances under Notification Nos. 29 to 32/2012-CX all dated 9.7.2012 against duty credit scrips may be treated by department as ‘exempted clearances’ in as much as these Notifications are granting exemption from Central Excise Duty and have been issued under Section 5A of the CEA,1944. In such case, the manufacturer cannot take Cenvat credit or is required to pay 6% amount under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. However, it is make explicit in these Notifications that the holder of the scrip, to whom the goods were cleared, shall be entitled to avail the drawback or CENVAT credit of the duties of excise (as it is debited in duty credit scrip). It is suggested that availment of Cenvat credit on such clearances should be made subject to the provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, though it is implicit.

If the department’s intention is to treat such clearances as duty paid clearances, rule 6(6) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, may be amended by incorporating/ adding such clearances (under Notification Nos. 29 to 32) to which provisions of sub-rules (1) to (4) of rule 6 are not applicable.

If rule 6(6) is to going to be amended, clearance of job work goods cleared by job worker under Notification 214/86-CE may also be added, in as much as such job work goods are not held as ‘exempted goods’ in various judicial pronouncements including Supreme Court’s judgment in Escorts Ltd. - 2004-TIOL-72-SC-CX and CESTAT Larger Bench’s Order in Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. - 2005-TIOL-305-CESTAT-MUM-LB.

If Rule 6(6) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 will be amended as suggested above, litigation can be reduced.

S. B. PARIKH
(The views expressed are personal views)


Posted by S B Parikh
 
Sub: Duty Credit Scrips can be used to Pay Excise Duty on Domestic Procurement

In relation to the captioned matter, I don't think that we need any clarificaton from CBEC for claiming the credit of any duty paid through the utilization of duty credit scrips. The primary reasons are as under:

(a) In various tribunal pronuncements, it has been held that benefit of CENVAT credit would be available when the person has used the duty credit scrips on the premise that usage of these scrips are one of the manner in which the payment is required to be made. Hence, the payment would be attributable to either excise or creditable portion of customs duty.

(b) The excise notifications issued to operationalize the domestice procurement of these scrips have inbuilt the above concept so as to reduce the litigation at a later date.

One of the concern which I have is in relation to the domestic procurement of goods by the usage of Served from India Scheme ('SFIS'). Excise notification 34/2006 dated June 14, 2006 only covers those scrips which are issued under the Foreign Trade Policy (2004-09) and those scrips which are issued under the new scrips would NOT get the benefit of duty free domestic procurement. Further, in the recent notifications issued by CBEC, there does not appear any notification which provides for any benefit to the scrips issued under SFIS.

Regards,
Hardik Shah

Posted by Anoop Kalavath
 
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension