Taxindiaonline.com
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com TIOL Tube Taxindiainternational.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register  
Saturday , July 2, 2016 | Updated : Jul 2, 10:15 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
 
 
NEWS FLASH
 
CBEC assigns addl charge of DG (GST) to Mahender Singh CBEC clarifies on clearance of bunker fuels to Indian vessels carrying containerised cargo (See ' Cir 1034' in Whats New) Common Adjudicating authority appointed for M/s Pace International (See 'NT 93-94' in Whats New) IDS - No extension beyond Sept 30: Revenue Secretary (See 'Mixed Buzz') India-Cyprus DTAA to be amended along Mauritius line; Sec 94A to be rescinded from 2013 (See 'TII Brief') Central Excise duty on jewellery: Time limit for taking CE registration & duty payment is extended up to 31.07.2016 (See 'Cir 1033' in What's New) The perfect communications storm (See 'TII EXCLUSIVE' in 'TII') SC admits petition on retrieving 'Kohinoor' diamond from UK India successfully test-fires new surface-to-air missiles NDPS - Can a writ of mandamus be issued to authorities to grant remission to convict? 'NO' rules Supreme Court (See 'Breaking News') CBEC - Launch of special drive from 1.7.2016 to 30.9.2016 to resolve certain pending issues in drawback cases (See 'DDT' Column) ST - CENVAT - It is beyond our comprehension as to how Appellant could have rendered its output service without availing services of pipeline laying contractors - concept of movability or immovability is irrelevant for determining eligibility to input service credit: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Newly introduced Customs (IGCR) Rules, 2016 vs erstwhile Rules, 1996 (See 'Guest' Column) I-T - Whether it is open to AO to refer matter to DVO u/s 55A if stamp duty is lower than agreement value - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Balance of Education Cesses in PLA - whether lapses or is refundable? (See 'DDT') CX - Respondents are not entitled to refund of accumulated credit lying in their accounts unless they are able to show that they are fulfilling conditions prescribed under Rule 5 of CCR and notification issued thereunder: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Core sector grows at 2.8% in May Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court - Only When Fundamental rights are violated (See 'DDT') Income Declaration Scheme - CBDT issues fresh FAQ; clarifies no sharing of info with any other agency and credit for TDS to be allowed in certain cases (See 'Breaking News') Petrol & Diesel prices marginally reduced CBDT issues transfer order of three CCITs; Aditya Vikram is new Pr DG (Systems) (See 'Transfer' in Pitara) World Bank President says Rajan is a 'great' Governor Bangalore CCIT Nutan Wodeyar to hold Addl Charge of International Taxation (South Zone) Applications invited for CESTAT Judicial Members posts CBEC hikes tariff value of gold & silver + some edible oils (See 'NT 92' in What's New) UPSC recommends 86 more candidates for civil services Positive growth registered in both Domestic and Foreign Tourist visits during 2015 Pay hike to boost consumer demand, eco growth
 
Bookmark and Share
Negative Blues-X: Employee recoveries

JULY 09, 2012

By G Natarajan, Advocate, Swamy Associate

THE definition of service under Section 65 B (44) of the Finance Act, 1994 specifically excludes “a provision of service by an employee to the employer in the course of or in relation to his employment”. But what about the services provided by the employer to their employees? Sounds strange?

The employer might be having a canteen in his factory / office premises. The caterer who provides the catering service would be rendering outdoor catering service to the employer and he would be liable to service tax and there is no doubt about it. If the employer is charging any amount from the employees towards provision of food, what will be the service tax liability in the hands of the employer for such amounts recovered from the employees?

It may be noted that as per Section 66 E (i) of the Act, the following is a declared a service.

“service portion in an activity wherein goods, being food or any other article of human consumption or any drink (whether or not intoxicating) is supplied in any manner as a part of the activity”.

This is the clause by which the restaurants selling food items are also made liable to the levy of service tax. So, strictly speaking, the employer would be liable to pay service tax on such recoveries. But the following exemption is available under S.No. 19 of Notification 25/2012.

Services provided in relation to serving of food or beverages by a restaurant, eating joint or a mess, other than those having (i) the facility of air-conditioning or central air-heating in any part of the establishment, at any time during the year, and (ii) a licence to serve alcoholic beverages.

Though, it is difficult to cherish that the canteen in the workplace is a restaurant, it is so. Hopefully, none of the employers would be having a licenced bar facility in their canteen (What about Mr. Vijay Mallaya?). Hence, they can claim the above exemption and need not pay any service tax for the amounts collected from their employees towards cost of food supplied in canteen.

Many employers also charge their employees towards providing transportation facility for them from their home to work place. They would have engaged the services of a rent a cab operator for this purpose, who would be charging service tax and there is no dispute about it. Subject to specified conditions, the employer may also be liable to discharge a part of the rent a cab operator's liability under reverse charge and there is no confusion in this regard also.

But, when the employer is collecting some amount from the employees for the facility of such transport, the employer is providing a service to their employees and strictly speaking the employer would be liable to pay service tax. But, the following exemption under S.No. 23 (b)of Notification 25/2012 can be claimed in such cases.

23. Transport of passengers, with or without accompanied belongings, by -

(b) a contract carriage for the transportation of passengers, excluding tourism, conducted tour, charter or hire.

Like the above, there may be many other amounts collected by the employers from their employees. Recovery of part of the cost towards undergoing medical treatment in the hospital run by the employer, would be exempted under S.No. 2 of Notification 25/2012. Any recovery towards providing residential accommodation would be covered under the negative list entry – Section 65D (m).

What about the employer providing telephone facility to the employee and recovering some amount towards personal use of such telephone? What amount the employee providing a car (not being a contract carriage) to the employee and recovering some amount towards its personal use? It remains to be seen whether there are any other recoveries which may throw up a service tax liability in the hands of the employer.


 RECENT DISCUSSION(S) POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
Sub: Employee recoveries

Really a good analysis. The same way, there are situations where employer recovers from employee for not fulfilling contractual obligation like - recovery on account of not continuing in employment after foreign deputation or higher education as per terms of contract.

We welcome author's view on the aforesaid situations.

Regards,

GR

Posted by AA AAA
 
 
 
Download on the App Store
Get it on Google play
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
HOME    BACK TO TOP   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Cases
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • CVD
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Drawback Cases
  • MISC Circulars
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • Cesses Notfications
  • Excise Amendment
  • MISC Circulars
  • 37B Order
  • Settlement
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Tribunal
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • 37B Order
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Miscellaneous
  • DIPP Notification
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • RBI Circulars
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • PMLA Notifications
  • Depository Scheme
  • Press Note
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Acts
  • State Policy
  • MISC
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Service News
  • Promotion
  • Transfer
  • Deputation Posts
  • Cadre Review
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Pay Commission
  • Service Cases
  • The Insider
  • MISC
  • Budget Speeches
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • Budget Circular
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension