News Update

Govt scraps ban on export of onionFormer Delhi Congress chief Arvinder Singh Lovely joins BJP with three moreUS Nurse convicted of killing 17 patients - 700 yrs of jail-term awardedGST - Payment of pre-deposit through Form GST DRC-03 instead of the prescribed Form APL-01 - Petitioner attributes it to technical glitches - Respondent is the proper authority to decide the question of fact: HC2nd Session of India-Nigeria Joint Trade Committee held in AbujaGST - Since SCN is bereft of any details and suffers from infirmities that go to the root of the cause, SCN is quashed and set aside: HC1717 candidates to contest elections in phase 4 of Lok Sabha ElectionsGST - Once Appellate Authority comes to the conclusion that SCN was issued by an officer who was not competent; reply was also considered by an incompetent authority and the Competent Authority had not applied its independent mind, Appellate Authority could not have assumed original jurisdiction and proceeded further with the matter: HC7th India-Indonesia Joint Defence Cooperation Committee meeting held in New DelhiGST - Neither the Show Cause Notice nor the order spell out the reasons for retrospective cancellation of registration, therefore, the same cannot be sustained: HCMining sector registers record production in FY 2023-24GST - If the proper officer was of the view that the reply is unclear and unsatisfactory, he could have sought further details by providing such opportunity - Having failed to do so, order cannot be sustained - Matter remanded: HCAnother quake of 6.0 magnitude rocks Philippines; No damage reported so farI-T - Initial burden of proof rested on assessee to substantiate his claim of having incurred expenditure on improvement of property: ITATTrade ban: Israel hits back against Turkey with counter-measuresI-T - Agricultural income can be treated by ITO as undisclosed income in absence of any substantial / corroborative material to prove same: ITATCanada arrests three persons in alleged killing of Sikh separatistI-T - Income from sale of property has to be classified & characterised only in manner of computation as per section 45(2): ITATCus - When there is nothing on record to show that appellant had connived with other three persons to import AA batteries under the guise of declaring goods as Calcium Carbonate, penalty imposed on appellant are set aside: HCCongress fields Rahul Gandhi from Rae Bareli and Kishori Lal Sharma from AmethiGST -Since both the SCNs and orders pertain to same tax period raising identical demand by two different officers of same jurisdiction, proceedings on SCNs are clubbed and shall be re-adjudicated by one proper officer: HCFormer Jharkhand HC Chief Justice, Justice Sanjaya Kumar Mishra appointed as President of GST TribunalSale of building constructed on leasehold land - GST implicationI-T - Interest received u/s 28 of Land Acquisition Act 1894 awarded by Court is capital receipt being integral part of enhanced compensation and is exempt u/s 10(37): ITATGirl students advised by Pak college to keep away from political events
 
Cross-Border Transactions in services under New ST Regime

July 05, 2012

By R Raghavendra Rao

UPTO 1st July 2012, cross - border transactions in services were governed by the Taxation of Services (Provided from outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006 and the Export of Service Rules, 2005. But, from 01.07.2012, there is a total change in treatment of cross -border transaction of services.While Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 defined “Export of Service”, there is no such express definition for “Import of Service”, apparently to handle the taxation of services flowing from J&K to rest of India under reverse charge. The significant difference between the position before 1.7.2012 and from 1.7.2012 is that, while to qualify as export, the recipient of the service as well as the place of provision of service should be outside India, whereas for reverse charge, it is only the service provided by any person located in a non-taxable territory (Outside India plus J&K) and received by any person located in the taxable territory (India minus J&K). The taxation of import of services is governed by Rule 2(1)(d)(G), read with Notification No.30/2012 ST and certain entries in the Mega Exemption Notification No.25/2012 ST. According to Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the service shall be treated as export if:

(a) the provider of service is located in the taxable territory,

(b) the recipient of service is located outside India,

(c) the service is not a service specified in the section 66D of the Act,

(d) the place of provision of the service is outside India,

(e) the payment for such service has been received by the provider of service in convertible foreign exchange, and

(f) the provider of service and recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with item (b) of Explanation 2 of clause (44) of section 65B of the Act

In the light of above definition and the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012 (POP Rules for short), I have made an attempt to tabulate the liability of service tax in various situations that may arise in cross border transactions. Let us assume an Architect has provided service for construction of a property, say a Guest House for a Company. There are three different variables, one is the location of the service provider, second is location of the service receiver and the third is location of the property. That will give us eight different combinations and the taxability of each of the situations is tabulated as under. For the sake of easy understandingJ&K has been ignored intentionally and India is taken as taxable territory and USA as non taxable territory.

Sl.No.

Location of Service Provider

Location of Service receiver

Location of the property

Liability

Remarks

1

India

India

India

Service Provider

Normal transaction like any other service.

2

India

USA

USA

Not liable to tax.

Amounts to export of service ( Rule6A of the ST Rules, 1994).

3

India

India

USA

Service Provider

Though property is located in USA, between Rule 5 and Rule 8 of the POP Rules, latter Rule is applicable and the POP shall be deemed to be in India.

4

India

USA

India

Service Provider

Though the location of Service receiver is US, since the service is provided in Taxable Territory, ST is applicable - Rule 5 of POP Rules.

5

USA

USA

USA

---

Outside the purview of Finance Act, 1994

6

USA

India

India

Service receiver

Clause B of Notification No 30/2012 ST.

7

USA

USA

India

Exempted

Though provided in taxable territory and hence taxable, it is exempted under Mega Notification No 25/2012 ST, Sl No. 34(c).

8

USA

India

USA

Not taxable

As per Sec 66B, the service is taxable only if it is provided in a taxable territory. In this case, since the place of service is a non-taxable territory, no ST is leviable.

It can be seen that Sl No (1,5), (2,6), (3,7) and (4,8) are mirror images of the transactions. The above situations can be applied mutatis mutandis for other services like performance based services etc.

The views expressed are personal.


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   

TIOL Tube Latest

Shri N K Singh, recipient of TIOL FISCAL HERITAGE AWARD 2023, delivering his acceptance speech at Fiscal Awards event held on April 6, 2024 at Taj Mahal Hotel, New Delhi.


Shri Ram Nath Kovind, Hon'ble 14th President of India, addressing the gathering at TIOL Special Awards event.