Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com HRindiaonline.com
 
LOGIN
Forgot Password |  Register
Thursday , April 24, 2014 | Updated : Apr 24, 13:27 IST
Income Tax    Customs    Excise    Service Tax    FEMA    DGFT    SEZ    Misc    Pitara    Budget   
About Us Contact Us Advertise
Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiaonline.com Taxindiainternational.com
NEWS FLASH
 
CX - It is ratio of law declared by Larger Bench which is applicable and not reasoning - CENVAT credit on Outdoor Catering services is admissible even if number of workers in factory is less than 250 - Appeal allowed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax Rebate - Appeal Lies to Tribunal and not Government: HC (See 'Breaking News') It's raining 'Black'! (See 'The Cob(Web) Column) ST - Once CESTAT had held the demand to be time barred, entering into merits of case and passing an order would amount to an illegality: HC (See 'Breaking News') Income Tax - expenditure incurred for development of roads/highways in BOT agreements - CBDT clarifies (See 'DDT') Railways introduces Mobile & Desktop APP on Windows 8.0 for train enquiry (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - Revenue alleging that activity does not amount to manufacture and hence credit should be reversed - Once duty on final products is accepted, CENVAT credit availed need not be reversed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Service Tax Rebate – Appeal Lies to Tribunal and not Government (See 'DDT') VAT - Whether a 'sale' within meaning of Sec 2 (ac) takes place when a stent or valve is implanted in a patient in course of surgical procedure in hospital: HC (See '2014-TIOL-551') Arvind Kejriwal Wins TIME 100 Readers’ Poll (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether CIT is required to examine application of income while processing the application for registration u/s 12A (See '2014-TIOL-553') DGCA allows passengers to use mobile phones during Flight USA approaches India for arrest of Congress Rajya Sabha MP for receiving bribe of USD 18.5 mn from American company to grant permission for Titanium mining Delhi HC orders preparation of Lists of Healthy and junk food items ACC extends tenure of Dr K Radhakrishnan, Secy, Department of Space till year-end in public interest Mumbai Service tax recovers tax from Videocon Group Companies; arrests one person (See 'Mixed Buzz') MoF notifies 8% interest rate for Savings (Taxable) Bonds, 2003 (See Notification in 'What's New') RBI Panel Report favours Enabling PKI in Payment System Applications (See 'Mixed Buzz') CENVAT credit on Construction service received prior to 01.04.2011 - services were billed prior to 1.4.2011 for which payment made prior to 1.4.2011 - Credit taken on 28.04.2011 cannot be held to be improper : CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') IRCON inks MoU with Transparency International India (See 'Mixed Buzz') CX - So-called 'special discount' is not discount at all is established by fact that it was never passed on to customers of cars and, therefore, is includible in AV - Demand of Rs 59 Cr upheld: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') CAG entitled to audit private telecom service providers - SC (See 'DDT' Column) ST - Tax of more than Rs 5.8 Cr collected from clients but not deposited with Govt - suppression of facts with willful intention to evade duty is manifest - no merit in plea for waiver of SCN as s.73(4) expressly disentitles same: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Disposal by Commissioner (A) - Quantity or Quality? (See 'DDT') Income tax - Whether when assessee holds substantial shares in partnership firm and also Company, any trade advance given by company to firm is to be treated as deemed dividend - NO: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') What about Central Excise and Service Tax Audit? (See 'DDT') CX - Sum claimed as refund is not shown as 'receivables' in books and same were expensed out in P&L a/c - Claim hit by unjust enrichment: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') Chennai CBI Court convicts Customs Appraiser for one year in bribery case Former Cabinet Secretary TSR Subramanian book raps Govt for poor decision making process ST - BAS provided to foreign clients - When RBI permits that remuneration towards services provided can be received in IC, in that situation it cannot be said that services are not exports -Stay dismissed: CESTAT (See 'Breaking News') MoF invites applications for post of Chairman of Settlement Commission (Customs & Excise') (See 'Service News' in Pitara) CENVAT Credit on input service of GTA up to Place of Removal - what is place of removal when rate of duty is specific? HC stays Tribunal Order (See 'DDT') RBI clarifies on FDI in pharma sector (See Cir 124 in 'What's New') Tour operators: Travelling in uncertainities of law - Part-II (See 'ST se GST tak' Column) Kerala General Sales Tax Act - sale by brand name holder or trade mark holder to be first sale for purpose of Sec 5(2): Supreme Court (See 'Breaking News') Anti Dumping Notification Expired- CBEC are you aware? (See 'DDT') I-T - Whether assessment can be reopened based on audit objections which give rise to only hypothetical income: HC (See '2014-TIOL-534') Lame Duck appointments - Principal Economic Adviser appointed in Fin Min ('DDT')
 
Bookmark and Share
ST - Appellant providing Compliance Services - view of CBEC that ordinary meaning of management will not cover Compliance Services concurred with - If public act relying on such circulars and still charge of suppression is slapped it can be worst travesty of justice: CESTAT

By TIOL News Service

NEW DELHI, JUNE 19, 2012: THE Appellants are YOUNG and also E(a)RN(e)ST. During the period 2001-02 to 2004-05 they provided assistance as required for complying with the regulation of Reserve Bank of India, Foreign Investment Promotion Board etc. and also for filing application for import export code, returns under Income Tax Act, returns with the office of Registrar of Companies, sales tax returns etc. which activities are collectively referred to as "Compliance Services".

Revenue was of the view that “Compliance Services” would fall within the definition of Management Consultancy Service and the appellants are liable to pay Service Tax. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued on 20.10.2006 demanding service tax of Rs.3,53,05,405/-.

This widely reported case was adjudicated by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi, but naturally by confirming the demand and imposing penalties galore.

Adverting to the definition of “Management Consultant”, the appellant submitted that when the relevant entry was introduced by Finance Act, 1994, industrial law practitioners, had approached the Director General of Service Tax for clarification in the matter as to whether activities in relation to complying with rules and regulations would come under the scope of "Management Consultancy Service" ; that t he Director General of Service Tax vide letter No V/DGST/21-26MC/9/99 dated 28-01-99 clarified that such activities would not be part of Management Consultancy Service ; that this view was reiterated in a letter F. No. 341/21/99-TRU dated 20-08-99 issued by TRU clarifying that practitioners who help in complying with ESI and PF Regulations would not come within the meaning of Management Consultant. The appellant further submitted that these clarifications reinforced their own interpretation that service tax was not payable on such activities and that is the reason why they were not paying service tax on the impugned activities. It is further submitted that the show cause notice issued in 20.10.06 demanding tax for the period 2001-2002 to 2004-2005 is clearly time-barred because this is a matter involving interpretation of law and they have acted bonafide by acting on the advice given by the Director General of Service Tax.

Reliance is also placed on the CBEC Circular no. 1/1/01-ST dated 27.06.2001 explaining the scope of the services covered by Management Consultancy Service and wherein it is clarified thus -

"9. Taking into account all the above points, the Board has taken a view that merger, acquisition and other form of restructuring of business organisation have emerged as key element in the modern management and as the term 'management' covers the various functions and the multifarious activities required for efficient and effective functioning of an organisation, any advisory services rendered in merger and acquisition transaction are also includible under the taxable service rendered by 'management consultant'. However, those agencies providing services as per the requirement of any statute or regulation such as Takeover Regulations of SEBI and, if their role is limited to the compliance of such act or regulations and not governed by any contractual relationship with the advisee company, then such services will not be covered under scope of 'management consultant' ."

Following decisions are also relied upon -

CCE, Chennai Vs. Futura Polyesters Ltd. ( 2011-TIOL-1404-CESTAT-MAD )

Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company Vs. CCE ( 2002-TIOL-235-SC-CX )

Wallace Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector ( 2002-TIOL-216-SC-CX )

The Revenue representative relied on the decision in Parasmal Bam Vs. CCE - ( 2002-TIOL-198-CESTAT-DEL ) where it is held that even giving advise to a company on matters relating to production, marketing, financial matters etc. will come within the meaning of Management Consultancy Service as defined under Section 65(65) of the Finance Act, 1994. It is further submitted that without “Compliance Services” the receiver of the service could not have carried on with their management functions and, therefore, service tax was payable. Adverting to the definition, it is also submitted that the definition of ‘Management Consultant' is extremely broad, as it encompasses any service that is directly or indirectly provided in connection with the management of any organisation in any manner; that the latter portion of the definition includes certain specific services, which include any advice or consultancy or technical assistance relating to conceptualizing, devising, development, modification, rectification or up-gradation of any working system of any organisation; that the latter inclusive part of the definition does not restrict the scope of the initial part which defines the service. Reliance is also placed on the definition of Management given in various Dictionaries and also the decision of the Apex Court in the case of CCE Vs. Parle Exports (P) Ltd.- ( 2002-TIOL-401-SC-CX ) .

On the plea of the appellant that the demand is hit by the bar of limitation, it is submitted that the appellant did not include the amount realised by rendering such Compliance Services in their ST-3 returns and the department had no opportunity to know that they were doing such activities amounting to Management Consultancy and hence the charge of suppression is correctly invoked.

The CESTAT observed -

“14. We have considered arguments on both the sides. We find that the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Futura Polyesters Ltd. (Supra) quoted above is clearly to the effect that most of the impugned activities could not fall under the definition of Management Consultancy Service. We are of the view that though compliance with laws is part of the responsibilities of management such responsibility per se cannot bring it into the ambit of the words "in connection with the management of any organisation" used in section 65(105)(r) and section 65 (65) of Finance Act, 1994 to tax such services. In this matter we see merit in the clarification given by CBEC in para 9 of its circular dated 27-06-2001. The decision of the Apex Court in the case of Parle Exports (P) Ltd (Supra) gives the rule that a taxing entry should be understood in the same way in which these are understood in the ordinary parlance. According to CBEC the ordinary meaning of management will not cover Compliance Services. According to the adjudicating authority ordinary meaning of management covers Compliance Services. We concur with the view of CBEC and reject the view of the adjudicating authority, since in our view every responsibility of management cannot be considered as management function. For example the management may have a responsibility to set up a canteen in a factory employing large number of workers. A person who gives advice on initial setting up of that canteen cannot be considered to be giving Management Consultancy Service. Out of the various impugned services, the services in the matters before FIPB there could be a doubt as to whether the service was in connection with management function or in connection with compliance of regulations. Since there is no such examination in the impugned order and since we find the demand to be time barred we are not dealing with this issue in detail.

15. The adjudicating authority has chosen to ignore the Circular of CBEC. But we would not like to ignore the decisions of Tribunal quoted before us. In the case of Prasmal Balm (Supra) the advice being given by the consultant was in the core functions of management namely production, marketing, finance and not for compliance services. The decisions of the Tribunal in the case of CCE Vs. Futura Polyesters Ltd. - ( 2011-TIOL-1404-CESTAT-MAD ) relates to Compliance Services and that has to be followed in this case.

16. Further this is clearly a case where the demand is time-barred because the appellants were acting on the basis of a circular issued by CBEC, invoking the powers under section 37B of Central Excise Act. If the public act relying on such circulars and still the charge of suppression is slapped on them it can be the worst travesty of justice. So there is no case for invoking suppression in this case.”

In fine the appeal was allowed both on merits as well as on the ground that the notice is hit by limitation.

The pick:

"...The adjudicating authority has chosen to ignore the Circular of CBEC. But we would not like to ignore the decisions of Tribunal quoted before us..."

(See 2012-TIOL-704-CESTAT-DEL)


POST YOUR COMMENTS
   
 
 
TIOL SEARCH
 
TIOL Mobile App
TIOL Subscriptions
 All-In-One Package
 Indirect Tax Package
 Income Tax Package
<< More Packages>>
 
   
             
Income Tax Customs Excise Service Tax FEMA DGFT SEZ Misc Pitara Budget
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • ITAT Cases
  • Instructions
  • Advance Ruling
  • Settlement
  • Other Case
  • Directorate of Income Tax (Systems)
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Safeguard Duty Notfn
  • Anti-dumping Notfn
  • Drawback Cases
  • Tariff Notfn
  • Non Tariff Notfn
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Settlement
  • Advance Ruling
  • Excise Amendment
  • Clean Energy Cess Notfn
  • MISC Circulars
  • Commr.(A) Order
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • Cestat Cases
  • Miscellaneous
  • Advance Ruling
  • FAQ
  • Finance Act, 1994
  • Commr. (A) Orders
  • Removal of Difficulty
  • VCES
  • Accounting Head
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • RBI Notifications
  • Act
  • Rules
  • Regulations
  • Master Circulars
  • RBI Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Public Notices
  • Trade Notice
  • FTDR Amendment 2010
  • MISC
  • State Acts
  • Notifications
  • Instructions
  • Act 2005
  • Rules 2006
  • DGEP
  • State Policy
  • SC Cases
  • HC Cases
  • VAT Cases
  • Deputation Posts
  • Service News
  • The Insider
  • Transfer
  • Promotion
  • Recruitment Rules
  • Transfer Policy
  • Training Circulars
  • Service Cases
  • MISC
  • Pay Commission
  • Cadre Review
  • Budget Circular 2013-14
  • Union Budgets
  • Economic Surveys
  • Budget Speeches
  • Finance Acts
  • Finance Bill
  • TRU - D. O. Letter
  • A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2014 Taxindiaonline.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension